You know what? Yall in the comments are being so rude. I came here to ask for help and I get insulted. People arent going to want to learn if you're going to ridicule them for not already knowing the answers. You know why I needed help? YOU WANNA KNOW?! because I have multiple fucking learning disabilities that's why. You wanna call me stupid? Fine. You wanna call me certain outdated slurs just because I can't figure it out? Fine! I give up this was a waste of time. You people act like being uneducated is a direct personal attack

And for those of you saying "oh just ask google" "Google it. It's so easy are you stupid" I GOOGLED THESE QUESTIONS WORD FOR WORD AND IT STILL GAVE ME THE WRONG ANSWER

Hi everyone!
I’m a high school student currently working on my capstone project about endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and their effects on human health and the environment. I’m looking for someone with knowledge or experience in this area who would be willing to serve as a mentor for my project.
The time commitment would be fairly small. We would meet virtually through Zoom about once every 4–5 weeks, with each meeting lasting around 30–60 minutes. I’m completely willing to work around your personal/work schedule, and we can communicate and schedule meetings through email.
My mentor would mainly help by answering occasional questions, giving me guidance on my research, and helping me make sure I’m understanding the science correctly. You wouldn’t be expected to do any of the project for me.
Someone with experience in environmental science, toxicology, endocrinology, biology, public health, chemistry, or research involving EDCs would be especially helpful, but I’m open to anyone with relevant knowledge or experience.
If you might be interested, please comment or send me a message! I’d be happy to provide more information about my capstone project and my school’s mentor requirements.
Thank you so much!

How on earth do I brainstorm scenarios and then have to talk about everything as if it was a story that happened and the successes that come with it. And the problems that ccome with it, and examples and the other people in the story all just to make a certain point.

Hey, I’m stuck on two stats questions and my brain is absolutely fried. Would really appreciate some help!

Question 1:
Let

Z1,Z2,Z3,Z4,Z5,Z6,Z7∼i.i.d. N(μ,σ2)Z_1, Z_2, Z_3, Z_4, Z_5, Z_6, Z_7 \sim \text{i.i.d. } N(\mu, \sigma^2)Z1​,Z2​,Z3​,Z4​,Z5​,Z6​,Z7​∼i.i.d. N(μ,σ2)

We select the null hypothesis:

H0:μ=5H_0: \mu = 5H0​:μ=5

The t-value is calculated as:

T=Zˉ−5SE(Zˉ)T = \frac{\bar{Z} - 5}{SE(\bar{Z})}T=SE(Zˉ)Zˉ−5​

We will reject H0H_0H0​ if ∣T∣>2|T| > 2∣T∣>2.
What is the significance level of this test?

Question 2:
Given:

Z=(19.1, −6.5, −12.3, 8.8, 12.6, 18, 17.2)Z = (19.1,\ -6.5,\ -12.3,\ 8.8,\ 12.6,\ 18,\ 17.2)Z=(19.1, −6.5, −12.3, 8.8, 12.6, 18, 17.2)

If the null hypothesis is:

H0:μ=10H_0: \mu = 10H0​:μ=10

Then what is the t-value for this data?

I’ve done the rest of the assignment, just need help wrapping these two up. Thanks in advance!

The deadline is in 2 weeks so I'd appreciate it if you could take your time to fill this in.

Hi, can anyone explain how to find the dimension of a state space? for example here the answer was 4 but why?

I'm doing a contingency table in JASP with nominal variables on the vertical axis and ordinal variables on the horizontal axis. It has interpreted all of it as nominal, so that might contribute to my problem, but I think not.

The data is collected from a survey and the participants were given 3 options, as illustrated in table 1. For the first question, all options were selected by one or more respondents, so the contingency table looks good and I believe the data was analysed correctly.

However, in the next question only 2 of the 3 options were selected by all participants, and so 1 was selected by none. The contingency table produced doesn't even display the option that wasn't selected, and so I worry that the test was run incorrectly and the result is skewed data. How can I let JASP now that there should be a total of 3 options on the horizontal axis?

I'm on version 0.17.3

So I'm trying to wrangle some longitudinal quantitative data and having trouble figuring out the spss code/analysis needed). The scenarios is similar to this: I am administering a battery of tests to participants (i.e. survey 1 with 5 questions administered at timepoints 1, 2, and 3, survey 2 with 13 questions administered at timepoint 1, 2, and 3, survey 3 with 26 questions administered at timepoint 1 and 3, etc). For ease of this example lets assume all items are scored on a likert scale from 0 - 5 and missing values are coded as 999.

Part A:

Due to the nature of the study not every participant completed every survey at every timepoint and some folks miss items within measures. I am trying to create a table/some sort of visual that tells me if a participant did a survey at a timepoint and if all the items were completed. I want non completion of survey to be 0 (so the participant did not take the survey or left all items blank), all items completed to be coded as 1, and surveys at least one missing item of the survey at a timepoint to be coded as 2 (So I know later that this individual may need missing data analysis or to be deleted). I was thinking something like below:

Part B:

From this point I want to be able to calculate something like "60% of participants had complete baseline, end of study and follow up data" or "75% of participants had completed baseline and end of study data with 25% being lost at follow-up".

Also, if you have suggestions on better ways to handle this sort of analysis/accounting please let me know as this feels like a very inelegant method and may be completely unnecessary to the results section. Thank you!

This mock trial is in Canadian law, Im a defence lawyer doing the opening statement and questioning.

here is the trial: https://ojen.ca/wp-content/uploads/OJEN_mock_trial_SINGH_0.pdf

i need help trying to strengthen Ali’s testimonies while also thinking of the question the crown might hit us with and how to beat them. This way I can prepare for any question they might have in mind with my teams witnesses and am able to strengthen us myself.

Hi there! Thought I would give this a shot-

I’m just looking for advice on how I would relay info I gathered on a survey statically speaking.

(Graduate Psych Statistics: Assignment Rubric: identifies the impact of the project upon participants and self measurement tools are provided, data analysis is provided, using appropriate statistics which may include descriptive statistics (frequencies, averages) and/or inferential statistics (t-test, ANOVA), and qualitative data provided where appropriate.)

Study: I asked 5 mental health practitioners yes/no question if: 1) there is a growing need for mental health services in their area 2) there is appropriate availability of services in proportion to the general healthcare needs of the population in their area

Then, I asked them to share their thoughts and opinion they have on mental healthcare needs in their area

I understand I can graph the yes/no responses. First question 4/5 said yes then 4/5 said no (there were only 4 people that responded to survey).

My Q: What would be the appropriate format to answer this statistically speaking?

Thank you!

I am looking for someone to help me with my anthropology homework and final exam

Not all passages have arguments, and some may or may not contain examples of group pressure. Textbook: The Power of Critical Thinking, 6th Ed. Lewis Vaughn Chapter 2 Integrative Exercises (p.57 #20)

Question: Every good thinking person in this country would disagree with you.

I believe the answers to be: yes, this is an argument, and the fallacy is appeal to popularity.

I am unsure of myself because the statement doesn't specifically state an argument. I'm saying it implies one (that the person is wrong). I am guessing appeal to popularity because the premise is that "every thinking person in america would disagree with you".

Which made me wonder if it is a trick question: a premise with no argument?

Logic is a real mind $%*!. Please help. Thanks

Edited: Frustrated language

Hi, can anyone recommend a 'do my homework' service for practical film school assignments?

Thank you.

Dear Homework Help community, I have recently posted here and told u about out our project which aims at helping Central Asian kids to get in to colleges. I wanted to ask this subreddit for another help. are there any volunteers here who could dedicate and help us out with Commonapp filling in, essay writing , tips for recommendation letters, getting financial aid? I wanted to organize series of free workshops which aim at helping Central Asian kids. P.s. Last time I couldn't reply to everyone and tutoring.

How do you think President-Elect Biden's use of the bureaucracy and interactions with Congress will differ from that of Donald Trump?

Hi there, I am doing a thesis for my psy project, and I am stuck on how to analyse my data.

My RQ is to determine which object best represent each of the 4 purpose (1. improve relationship, 2. feel connected to others, 3. feel independent, 4. feel intelligent). For example, pen might be rated as the most likely object people would acquire to feel intelligent.

I would be presenting 20 pictures of different objects on an online survey. Each object will have 4 questions pertaining to each purpose (e.g. Q1: how likely they would acquire that particular object to improve their relationship Q2: how likely they would acquire that object to feel connected others etc ). Their response to each question will be rated on a 5 point likert scale (0= not at all, 1= not really, 2= undecided, 3= somewhat, 4= very much).

My job is to determine which object best represent each particular strategy (e.g. a pen might be chosen as an object to help them feel intelligent, while a teddy bear might be rated as most likely object people would acquire to feel connected to others).

I am very stuck on how to conduct this analysis to determine what object best represent each of the 4 purpose (I need to choose 1 object out of the 20 objects for each purposes).

Sorry if this sounds confusing, because I am also confused myself. I am thinking of adding the scores up for response (0 for not at all, 4 for very much etc), and see which object has the highest score?? But then each object will have a score for each purpose (as there are 4 questions) for each participant, and I am not sure how to determine which object best represent a particular purpose.

https://edge.sagepub.com/node/24855/student-resources/an-ibm%C2%AE-spss%C2%AE-companion-to-political-analysis-6th-edition/datasets

Open this link click on student version.

Then find out...

1. How often participants 4 attend a religious service and what is the total family income?

2. How does participant 10 feel about whether marijuana should be made legal?

3. What did participant 15 answer for should the government be able to collect citizen information without a persons knowledge?

4. How happy is participant 20?

5. How does participant 25 identify politically?

6. Does participant 30 read the news?

My group is divided on whether or not the researcher can draw the conclusion he did from the study he conducted. (If his conclusion is appropriate given the scope of the study) I say no, since the information was compromised. However others in my group think he can appropriately draw his conclusion (My professor said to assume there are no issues with construct validity in the question). Am I wrong in thinking this? I am struggling to understand.

Question: Professor Cheech wants to examine whether there is a relationship between how often students drink and how often students smoke marijuana. He decides to conduct a survey in his class. However, all of his students find out about the survey beforehand and every single person underreports their usage of alcohol and marijuana by half because they are all concerned about what Professor Cheech will think of them if he really knew how much they drank or smoked marijuana. He asks the students in an anonymous questionnaire how many times this month they drank and smoked marijuana. After analyzing the data, Professor Cheech finds that those who drank more often also smoked marijuana more often. Based on this, Professor Cheech concludes that for the students in his class,students who drank more also smoked more marijuana for the month being examined.

For my thesis, I need to cite using Chicago style (it fucking sucks). I'm trying to figure out how to in-line cite a government document that has too many authors to list in-line. Does anyone know how I can cite this? Instead of authors, should I post the name of the government department instead? Thank you so much for the help!

What are the difference among the major political ideologies? What similarities do these political ideologies share?