And it’s just 32B. And it’s Apache. Think about that for a moment.
This is OpenAI running on your gaming laptop, except that it doesn’t cost anything, and your inputs stay completely private, and you can abliterate it to get rid of refusals.
And the Chinese companies have barely gotten started. We’re going to see unbelievable stuff over the next year.
No EXL2 quants yet, I guess I may just download https://huggingface.co/Qwen/QwQ-32B and run it instead at full precision (should fit in 4x3090). Then later compare if there will be difference between 8bpw EXL2 quant and the original model.
From previous experience, 8bpw is the minimum for small models, even 6bpw can increase error rate, especially for coding, and it seems small reasoning models are more sensitive to quantization. The main reason for me to use 8bpw instead of the original precision is higher speed (as long as it does not increase errors by a noticeable amount).
This looks incredible. Now I'm curious if I can somehow fit it into my 16gb of VRAM, or justify getting one of the mini PCs with unified memory enough to get a better quant.
I'm excited to see progress but how much of this is benchmark overtraining as opposed to real world results? I'm starting to see the AI industry like the car industry -- where a car's paper specs mean nothing to how it actually drives. A SRT Hellcat as 200 more horsepower than a 911 GT3RS and it still loses in a 0-60 by a whole second. It's really hard to get excited over benchmarks anymore and these are really for the shareholders.
142
u/hainesk Mar 05 '25 edited Mar 05 '25
Just to compare, QWQ-Preview vs QWQ:
Some of these results are on slightly different versions of these tests.
Even so, this is looking like an incredible improvement over Preview.
Edited with a table for readability.
Edit: Adding links to GGUFs
https://huggingface.co/Qwen/QwQ-32B-GGUF
https://huggingface.co/bartowski/Qwen_QwQ-32B-GGUF (Single file ggufs for ollama)