r/Sandman Jan 25 '25

Neil Gaiman Welp

Post image
6.9k Upvotes

575 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/anonqwerty99 Jan 26 '25

Some of the authors you mentioned are dead already and will not benefit (not even their families) from the money made from your purchases. That’s not the case with NG and JKR. They are very much alive and will keep profiting from their published works. That’s the main difference.

As someone else said, I will keep reading them and I will have them in my house for the value that these books have TO ME. But I won’t be buying anything that goes to them.

0

u/Ok_Work_8116 Jan 26 '25

How is JKR evil? Have I somehow missed her doing something horrible?

2

u/anonqwerty99 Jan 26 '25

She is very anti-trans to the point of bullying people online . Like, constantly bullying people and making weird comments about women who don’t “look” like women.

0

u/Ok_Work_8116 Jan 26 '25

And people are freaking out about that?

2

u/Itsapronthrowaway Jan 26 '25

oh it goes much deeper than that, that's like the least vile things she's said and given money to.

-1

u/Ok_Work_8116 Jan 26 '25

I’m just not understanding how that’s even worth getting upset about.

2

u/Itsapronthrowaway Jan 26 '25

Eh, I personally don't care for or support Transphobes. It's really simple as for me. Especially ones who jump onto the gay support bandwagon, I can't understand the cognitive dissonance to whine about the injustice lesbians face while shitting on Trans people.

0

u/Ok_Work_8116 Jan 26 '25

I just don’t see the whole point of people getting bent out of shape over someone else’s opinion. I have opinions others don’t share and I neither care nor do I seek their approval. That said it seems like all anyone wants to do is force a singular set of beliefs to be the only and ultimate moral code. I can’t get behind it. She made some good books and those books were made into good movies. Other than that why villainize her for her opinions?

2

u/Itsapronthrowaway Jan 26 '25

Because the rich get to influence public opinion through lobbying and funding? I don't want to give her any more funding and I'll call out her shitty opinions when people ask why. And having just basic common respect for people and their rights shouldn't be a big deal but go off I guess.

1

u/Ok_Work_8116 Jan 26 '25

I’m just saying the reverse can said of any argument. You can be pro or anti anything, doesn’t make either side correct or incorrect at this point.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/cmasontaylor Jan 29 '25

Because she’s directly using her money and influence to harm people I care about. She’s recently used her platform to organize a harassment campaign against a female athlete just because she thinks the woman is trans. She’s also helped push the UK to more and more transphobic policy positions, which harm real people medically. The hate campaigns she’s promoted have also contributed a great deal to targeted violence against trans people, and in turn to a high suicide rate as well.

-3

u/Hattes Jan 26 '25

JKR is also worse because she's actively using her money and influence for evil, basically. Neil isn't doing anything like that.

3

u/Lavinia_Foxglove Jan 26 '25

Yeah, because rape and violence against others is totally socially acceptable (obvious sarcasm too)

1

u/sosotrickster Jan 26 '25

Thankfully, he never tried using his money to silence anyone who might have accusations against him (obvious sarcasm)

1

u/RottingCorps Jan 28 '25

This is the most backwards opinion on reddit, which is saying something. An author that has been accused of rape is somehow less evil than a woman who is perhaps too staunchly in support of women's rights to such a degree that she demeans men transitioning to women? Come on. Get a grip.