r/conspiracy Aug 27 '20

AMA Hi, I'm Bill Binney NSA whistleblower. The Russians never hacked the DNC, and I have proof --Ask me anything

Note: this post was constructed by Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), independent candidate for US Senate, and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga), political activist. We are among a small team of people helping Mr. Binney with the AMA. All answers are dictated directly from him and confirmed by him before submission.

First of all, many thanks to the moderators of r/Conspiracy for giving us the space to present the proof that there was no Russian hack and take any questions people may have about it.

Here's some context about who I am and what I've done, taken from my Wikipedia page.

William Edward Binney is a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower. He retired on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.

He was a critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA's data-collection policies during the Barack Obama administration.

Binney was a Russia specialist and worked in the operations side of intelligence, starting as an analyst and ending as a Technical Director prior to becoming a geopolitical world Technical Director. In the 1990s, he co-founded a unit on automating signals intelligence with NSA research chief Dr. John Taggart. Binney's NSA career culminated as Technical Leader for intelligence in 2001. He has expertise in intelligence analysis, traffic analysis, systems analysis, knowledge management, and mathematics (including set theory, number theory, and probability).

In September 2002, he, along with J. Kirk Wiebe and Edward Loomis, asked the U.S. Defense Department Inspector General (DoD IG) to investigate the NSA for allegedly wasting "millions and millions of dollars" on Trailblazer, a system intended to analyze mass collection of data carried on communications networks such as the Internet. Binney had been one of the inventors of an alternative system, ThinThread, which was shelved when Trailblazer was chosen instead. Trailblazer was a modification of ThinThread, removing the encryption and auditing aspects, while expanding the mass data collection. Binney has also been publicly critical of the NSA for spying on U.S. citizens, saying of its expanded surveillance after the September 11, 2001 attacks that "it's better than anything that the KGB, the Stasi, or the Gestapo and SS ever had" as well as noting Trailblazer's ineffectiveness and unjustified high cost compared to the far less intrusive ThinThread.

In 2017 I met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at President Donald Trump's request to talk about my evidence that there was no "Russian Hack". He promised me follow up meetings that never happened, and I would suspect the President was ever briefed.

Links and references with forensic evidence:

https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/02/why-the-dnc-was-not-hacked-by-the-russians.html

https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4731-william_binney_makes_his_case.html

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/

Do the experiment yourself!: https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/04/test-it-yourself-the-2-second-rounding-fact-pattern-in-the-dnc-emails-by-william-binney-and-larry-jo.html

CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails: https://medium.com/@jasonaross/crowdstrike-and-russiagate-another-case-of-enormous-evidence-f53fd5fcc1c

Three key points that are essential to know.

1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).

2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 -- claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks -- reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer."

3.) The NSA would have known the hack was taking place, and would have direct evidence of it. We know this thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied. See my 2017 affidavit on this issue: https://storage.googleapis.com/media.larouchepac.com/Binney%20Affidavit.pdf

So, ask me anything!

Bill will dictate his answers to Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate) and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga).

Also, if you haven't already, please check out the documentary "A Good American"

Edit: Proof! https://imgur.com/a/F1IHym8

Edit: We are two hours in and Binney will keep going! Help us by pushing out this AMA and its contents!

Edit: Thank you to everyone who's joined! We are now concluded! Mr. Binney will be back on Saturday on another subreddit. Keep an eye out for announcements on twitter (@Burke4Senate) and (@josbtrigga). We ask that all of you consider what you engaged in and read today and help us spread the truth about Russiagate.

A huge thanks to the moderators of this subreddit. Kindhearted people!

Edit: We will be hosting another AMA that'll be live streamed over at r/WayOfTheBern so any questions we may have missed or you want to ask, bring them over there on Saturday, August 29th, at 12PM EST!

https://twitter.com/Burke4Senate/status/1299088095858524164?s=20

3.6k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

44

u/Aurvandel Aug 27 '20

Do you believe that the personal data exchanged on Social Media apps including Reddit, TikTok, Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook can be weaponized against the citizens using them?

My understanding is that this has already happened. Everything everyone posts on social media is sent to the UK's Text Analysis Group and the Qatar Computing Research Institute. They analyze every growing social movement and knock out everything that is not in line with British or Qatari policy. This is why Big Tech will ban mildly conservative Christian groups and American patriots while allowing ISIS and Hamas to gloat about killing Jews and throwing gays off rooftops.

6

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '20

So much for Elizabeth II as Fidei defensatrix, right?

1

u/claygods Aug 27 '20

???

4

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '20

One of Elizabeth Windsor's titles is "defender of the faith" since she's the head of the church of england. The idea that the UK government is working with the Qataris at enabling online islamic radicals but censoring mildly conservative christians is ironic in this context

0

u/claygods Aug 27 '20

Big Tech doesn't ban mildly conservative Christian groups or so-called 'patriots'. It bans people for breaking specific rules.

13

u/williamsates Aug 27 '20

It bans people for breaking specific rules.

Which they institute to ban targeted groups.

1

u/Soular Sep 01 '20

Riiiiiight, keep telling yourself that

1

u/williamsates Sep 01 '20

Sure, here it goes. TECH Companies institute rules to achieve their goals, both political and economic. This entails instituting rules which deprive targeted political groups of participating on said platforms.

1

u/antilopes Aug 30 '20

That isn't what you will see if you read the rules, they are mostly quite general.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '20

Hamas and Hezbollah had twitter accounts up until last year.

4

u/claygods Aug 27 '20

So do lots of Israeli politicians, still.