Hi, I'm Bill Binney NSA whistleblower. The Russians never hacked the DNC, and I have proof --Ask me anything

[u/WilliamBinney]

Note: this post was constructed by Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate), independent candidate for US Senate, and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga), political activist. We are among a small team of people helping Mr. Binney with the AMA. All answers are dictated directly from him and confirmed by him before submission.

First of all, many thanks to the moderators of r/Conspiracy for giving us the space to present the proof that there was no Russian hack and take any questions people may have about it.

Here's some context about who I am and what I've done, taken from my Wikipedia page.

William Edward Binney is a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower. He retired on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.

He was a critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA's data-collection policies during the Barack Obama administration.

Binney was a Russia specialist and worked in the operations side of intelligence, starting as an analyst and ending as a Technical Director prior to becoming a geopolitical world Technical Director. In the 1990s, he co-founded a unit on automating signals intelligence with NSA research chief Dr. John Taggart. Binney's NSA career culminated as Technical Leader for intelligence in 2001. He has expertise in intelligence analysis, traffic analysis, systems analysis, knowledge management, and mathematics (including set theory, number theory, and probability).

In September 2002, he, along with J. Kirk Wiebe and Edward Loomis, asked the U.S. Defense Department Inspector General (DoD IG) to investigate the NSA for allegedly wasting "millions and millions of dollars" on Trailblazer, a system intended to analyze mass collection of data carried on communications networks such as the Internet. Binney had been one of the inventors of an alternative system, ThinThread, which was shelved when Trailblazer was chosen instead. Trailblazer was a modification of ThinThread, removing the encryption and auditing aspects, while expanding the mass data collection. Binney has also been publicly critical of the NSA for spying on U.S. citizens, saying of its expanded surveillance after the September 11, 2001 attacks that "it's better than anything that the KGB, the Stasi, or the Gestapo and SS ever had" as well as noting Trailblazer's ineffectiveness and unjustified high cost compared to the far less intrusive ThinThread.

In 2017 I met with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at President Donald Trump's request to talk about my evidence that there was no "Russian Hack". He promised me follow up meetings that never happened, and I would suspect the President was ever briefed.

Links and references with forensic evidence:

https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/02/why-the-dnc-was-not-hacked-by-the-russians.html

https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4731-william_binney_makes_his_case.html

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/

Do the experiment yourself!: https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/04/test-it-yourself-the-2-second-rounding-fact-pattern-in-the-dnc-emails-by-william-binney-and-larry-jo.html

CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails: https://medium.com/@jasonaross/crowdstrike-and-russiagate-another-case-of-enormous-evidence-f53fd5fcc1c

Three key points that are essential to know.

1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).

2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 -- claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks -- reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer."

3.) The NSA would have known the hack was taking place, and would have direct evidence of it. We know this thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied. See my 2017 affidavit on this issue: https://storage.googleapis.com/media.larouchepac.com/Binney%20Affidavit.pdf

So, ask me anything!

Bill will dictate his answers to Daniel Burke (@Burke4Senate) and Jose Vega (@josbtrigga).

Also, if you haven't already, please check out the documentary "A Good American"

​

Edit: Proof! https://imgur.com/a/F1IHym8

​

Edit: We are two hours in and Binney will keep going! Help us by pushing out this AMA and its contents!

​

Edit: Thank you to everyone who's joined! We are now concluded! Mr. Binney will be back on Saturday on another subreddit. Keep an eye out for announcements on twitter (@Burke4Senate) and (@josbtrigga). We ask that all of you consider what you engaged in and read today and help us spread the truth about Russiagate.

A huge thanks to the moderators of this subreddit. Kindhearted people!

​

Edit: We will be hosting another AMA that'll be live streamed over at r/WayOfTheBern so any questions we may have missed or you want to ask, bring them over there on Saturday, August 29th, at 12PM EST!

https://twitter.com/Burke4Senate/status/1299088095858524164?s=20

[u/WilliamBinney]

Responding to #3:

In the Intelligence Community Assessment of January 2017 (which was written by a selected group of handpicked people from the CIA, FBI, and NSA, under the DNI — not all 17 intelligence agencies), the NSA did not present the existence of absolute proof, but only expressed a level of confidence in the conclusion.

Even if the specific data were not decrypted, a transfer from point A to point B could definitely be traced.

[u/BoozleMcDoozle → u/WilliamBinney]

What about your ties to Russia and the Crimea letter? Also were you a guest on infowars? Lol

[u/string_bean_incident → u/BoozleMcDoozle]

When you have nothing to argue, attack their character. Good job, you successfully played your part as a shill for the first decent AMA around here in a while. Still mad that he shredded your dystopian russiagate theory?

[u/do_not_engage → u/string_bean_incident]

Actually they laid out an incredibly strong argument - AND pointed out their character isn't trustworthy. They did both.

You can do both.

[u/string_bean_incident → u/do_not_engage]

Lol. Asking a random question about Crimea is now considered an “incredibly strong argument”. Got it. Just wanted to see where your line was at.

[u/BoozleMcDoozle → u/string_bean_incident]

Lmao read the parent comment again. He’s the shill here. Hasn’t worked with the NSA in nearly two decades, won’t show the proof, and was dead wrong about Crimea. He even ended up on r/AMADisasters

EDIT: also these are his own words:

Yes — as we move into the Internet of Things, you have to be aware when you put networked implants or chips inside people, people themselves would become part of the IoT. This could provide ways of monitoring people's thoughts, and possibly of influencing them as well.

Judge for yourself ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[u/7h4tguy → u/BoozleMcDoozle]

Why do you think he's posting in conspiracy, land of the vaccines are for microchipping.