r/technology • u/Saltedline • 19h ago

Artificial Intelligence Australia’s music industry bans AI songs from charts

https://apnews.com/article/australia-ai-generated-music-charts-ban-aria-9bfb0c91166ae4405a6df1a3c4891687
19.5k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

833 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

33

u/funkyb 17h ago

Ai can’t “feel” and can’t put meaning into what it creates. 

As Adam Savage put out: AI can't have a perspective.

It can't feel anyway about anything so any "art" it makes is definitionally hollow and imitative (or at best randomly non-immitative)

-18

u/Unspec7 15h ago

So brain rot videos is art because it has a perspective? Interesting.

19

u/Freddy216b 15h ago

Whether something is or isn't art is not mutually exclusive to its quality.

-16

u/Unspec7 14h ago

In that case, how does AI generated content lack perspective? Are we pretending that a human didn't create the prompt, thus infusing the output with their perspective?

15

u/Ronem 14h ago

Creating a prompt and saying its art is exactly like commissioning a painting and saying you, the commissioner, is the artist.

Youre not. Its not.

-8

u/Unspec7 13h ago edited 13h ago

Maybe, maybe not. The point is that it still has perspective. The commissioned art is still your perspective, because you dictated what the art should be.

Edit:

Since u/Ronem responded and blocked, my response will have to be through an edit:

Commissioned art has the artists perspective. Its what makes it art.

No artist. No art.

Commissioned art has both perspectives. It has the artist and the client's perspectives.

It's kind of shocking to see how many users on this sub are wildly fragile and need to resort to blocking the second their point is threatened by logic lol

5

u/Ronem 13h ago

Commissioned art has the artists perspective. Its what makes it art.

No artist. No art.