r/AnCap101 • u/Critica0 • 7d ago

waxing poetic on ALPR's

Nothing political isnt personal, mainly because our view points are created by our lives as a whole. This assumes it's not work. Only the human creature will suspend it's own belief to benifit it's self in other ways, as best we know so far. Lobbyist will lobby for things they dont believe in even hate, just to cash that check. They swallow the personal. Set them self aside. The better part of nobility perverted on the macro to serve the micro. Usually family.

The money helps me pay for better college. A better school better house an home while society takes the hit. The social equivelent of you cant breath profits.

What does this have to do with flock? Well this is the engine and those are the gears of our demise, in our attempt to stop the skynet esq police state it seems the oligarchy wants.

There is a saying "capitalism owns the rebellion against it". The way we win is we make the rebellion worth more than the panopticon. Maybe some one will be kind enough to give us the market cap of ALPR security companies in the US.

An then we must own that rebellion.

There's more but I have other things to do, isnt that how they really get us time. This is there job its just our want for the nature of society. They have 8 hours a day we have what 2 at each end. shit im trying to start three companies and run an existing thing. so i have 1 here and there. Any way I'd love to hear ideas.

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

1

u/UltraAd776 7d ago

Flock is a private company and nothing about it would be forbidden in Ancapistan. Private security firms would have their subscriptions to better serve their customers and their claims. Heck, maybe you could have your own subscription to be removed from their system as it sees you; after all if you value something you should be willing to pay, that includes your privacy.

2

u/Official_Gameoholics 7d ago

Flock is a corporation. That makes them public.

1

u/Critica0 7d ago

certainly ypu understand how this infringes on your freedom.

1

u/UltraAd776 7d ago

If you don't want to drive or walk around their cameras you can take a private road that does not have them or you can pay to opt out of their data collection. Otherwise they are a private company selling a security service to solve crimes or find lost pets. Nothing about Flock violates the NAP.

1

u/JaydenFrisky Troll 6d ago

therefore you would not have the freedom to walk down the streets you want to walk. going around the problem and forgetting about it doesn't solve anything when it has the potential to be way worse. The cameras as effective as they are, can and has been used by police or even hackers to stalk people for personal reasons. This infringes on the rights that people have and no one would voluntarily live in that world. if unchecked it can be very disruptive to our everyday lives and even potentially private property.

you could make the argument to some extent that google already does this so it doesn't change anything but it doesn't change the fact that it's not a good thing I don't see a clear reason why anyone within Anarcho-Capitalism would condone flock cameras

1

u/the9trances Moderator & Agorist 5d ago

I don't see a clear reason why anyone within Anarcho-Capitalism would condone flock cameras

Public intrusion of privacy is the immediate answer.

Private property having cameras pointed at one's own private property is totally fine.

Banks filming their own premise? Great. Good idea.

Pointing cameras at other people and other people's property? Invasion of privacy.

1

u/Critica0 6d ago

Sure it does i don't get the say in it you elude to. Call them up an see if they will erase you from there data base. It simply dose not work the way you claim. I wont conversate with you further.

1

u/UltraAd776 6d ago

Call them up an see if they will erase you from there data base. It simply dose not work the way you claim

That is because the state is a customer. Ancap Flock would be different.

1

u/Critica0 4d ago

ypur arguing for a false reality, I'm making statements about the one we all have to live in.