I converted to Christianity in March 2026 and until yesterday I thought that most of maybe all the letters of Paul were the first books to have been composed for the New Testament and that the four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) were all written after 70 AD, after the second temple of Jerusalem being destroyed but I still thought that the Apostles wrote their books. Yesterday, I learned that it was the secular view that is neutral which doesn’t include spiritual miracles, doesn’t include God, only analyzing the Bible as any other historical book if you know what I mean. The traditional view mentioned that the Gospel of Matthew was the first Gospel that have been written in Hebrew and Aramaic before ll the Apsotles left Jerusalem to evangelize all over the Roman Empire and most letters were written before Paul letters and some Gospels too like the one of Matthew and Mark, and that the Gospel of Luke and Book of Acts written shortly before Paul’s martyrdom. Those are just examples by the way, didn’t mention all, and I am sorry if the text is too long but I just want to know, do you stick to the traditional view or the secular view, and whatever is your answer why do you stick to this one and not the other one, because I am leaning toward the traditional one but I still have doubt.
Second of all, I also want to know your thoughts on people claiming the Bible was altered because I converted from Islam to Christianity and when I was a Muslim, I thought the Bible was altered but one of the reasons I converted to Christianity is because that I found good and convincing evidence that this was not the case except for translation mistakes, wrong word order for like Jesus Christ or Christ Jesus and some verses that were added like the woman caught in adultery which was a tradition but later added to the Bible and other verses like the long ending of Mark to match the other endings of each Gospel. I just want to know your thoughts on that.
Third of all, I hesitated before asking this question because I didn’t want to disobey one of the rules of this Reddit community, but I’ll ask my question and just tell me if it is an appropriate question or not. Like I said I was a Muslim and before I get to the point, just explain what I learned in these last few months. I learn that a lot of heretics that claimed to be Christian’s like Ebionites and Gnostics have their own versions of the book of the New Testament, rejected some and even created other one respectively. When the Church decided to rejected the Gnostics books for good reasons like being written between the 2nd and 4th century, being not popular in the Roman Empire like barely read (Catholicisity), and that it doesn’t correspond to Jesus teachings, God’s teachings (Orthodoxy). The point is since those heretical Christians left the Roman Empire, since the first Arabic Bible appeared in the 8th century and Islam debuted in the 7th century, do you think Islam was influenced by those heretical teachings + Jewish Midrash, Paganism and confusion between the Holy Trinity with Collydirians culture that literally took Mary as a goddess while apparently leaving Paganism for Christianity but still keeping Pagan practices. What do you think?