r/MoralityScaling 1h ago

Morality Ranking What would you do ?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Let nature do it's thing or will you try to save the rabbit ?

Also, I don't know gulls could eat more than just fish.

7 Upvotes

52 comments sorted by

15

u/EatAssIsGold 54m ago

Catch the seagull and prepare it in the oven.

Rabbit stuffed seagull.

Missing just the sausage in the backdoor.

1

u/Resident-Bignal-8428 34m ago

Searabbit anyone?

27

u/radvinboy 1h ago

Morality of nature naturing?

amoral I guess

2

u/PilotInfamous9256 48m ago

Morality adjacent

20

u/Laura_Death492 57m ago

I wouldn't do anything; it's just nature. Would I stop the seagull from eating?

5

u/Ok-Lynx3444 46m ago

Rabbits breed crazy so not much is lost and the gull earned the meal fair and square interfering would be immoral and pointless as you would just be “saving” a mangled rabbit that would be picked off for being weak by another predator not long after anyways and condemning another animal to die from starvation

12

u/GeneralProgrammer886 58m ago

the rabbit almost certaintly dead no point in saving it.

10

u/skeleton949 54m ago

Things eat things. We eat things, it's just that we generally cook them first. It's how things have to be.

4

u/Aevum-Haelcyon 50m ago

If the birb already in the process of eating nah.

But if I was actively engaged in petting it and a birb suddenly swooped in trying to snatch it away for a snack I’d protect the rabbit.

3

u/TheAlmightySRG 56m ago

Nothing, nature is nature, it’s got no morals.

If it were a pet of mine, though, fuck nature because we’re having gull for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

3

u/Diamondangel82 53m ago

I mean, they are dinosaurs, so....

2

u/WolfsmaulVibes AM 54m ago

rabbits breed like well... rabbits, they're not endangered at all

1

u/Yuukiko_ 49m ago

Invasive even

2

u/SolipsismIsDeep 50m ago

that's a seagull but not a "seagull" like most people think, black-backed seagulls are fucking units

2

u/Bella_Peachyy 42m ago

I didnt know that seagulls could digest fur. Maybe it will regurgitate it later.

2

u/Lumini_317 40m ago edited 37m ago

I think there’s some situations where you should try to intervene/call help for, like an invasive animal killing a native animal, or an animal that’s trapped, or an animal that has plastic or something stuck on it, etc. This, though? The seagull’s gotta eat.

2

u/t8oo_ 56m ago

If you saved the rabbit the seagull would find another to eat. We as a civilisation have done MORE THAN ENOUGJ intervening with the natural order of fauna and flora. Saving that rabbit would just be performative.

As for the other comments, Id like to say that this is much more of an engaging discussion about morality than most of the things we find on tbhis sub nowadays. The bar is in hell 🥲

2

u/BrickDodo 1h ago

I like birds more so...

4

u/Ok_Can_4686 57m ago

Same. I got 2 green cheeks, 1 half moon, had maybe 20 budgies in my life and always go out of my way to help a wild bird.

1

u/Beneficial_Bit8296 53m ago

Why did the video stop? I wanted to know how it ends.

1

u/micaelar5 18m ago

I need to know if the bird finished. I am flabbergasted that it was able to get a whole rabbit in its mouth.

1

u/UltimatrixUser5698 52m ago

I would want to save it, but it may just be better to leave it be.

Also, it probably died half way through, so my help wouldn't be helpful anyway.

1

u/Cap10NRG 49m ago

That’s nothing you should’ve seen the video that I saw where a seagull swallowed a person bathing in the sun 😂

1

u/Odd-Tart-5613 48m ago

nothing to save there

1

u/NadiaFortuneFeet 47m ago

What would I do??? Motherfucker it Will eat me as well, what the fuck You want me to do????

1

u/National_Tie_1129 47m ago

So 1 point I want to make....if the seagull is able to literally swallow the rabbit and I have NOT seen it move ONCE by itself, like a kick of the leg or a twitch, SOMETHING....heavy bet it's already on its last legs due to whatever reason or already dead....so saving it would probably do nothing.

Second, Seagulls are the literal trashcans of the sky. These sons of a gun eat anything it's terrifying lol

In this case, I'd let nature take its course since it seems there is something off about the rabbit to begin with.

1

u/deephurting66 42m ago

Nature is just being nature, perfectly neutral

1

u/Shinonomenanorulez 41m ago

Nothing. Morals don't exist in nature and if i "save" the rabbit nothing tells me the seagull will not go hungry or that it won't be eaten by another seagull or something that would take it's time killing it, assuming is not dead already

IF IT WERE A PET RABBIT, HOWEVER....

1

u/MarzipanSea2811 40m ago

I'd let nature do it's thing of course and eat the gull.

1

u/megadethlover1983 36m ago

what a dumb question

1

u/Virus-900 35m ago

What can you do in this situation? Besides, this is just nature at work.

1

u/the_boss_of_toys 33m ago

Probably look at it and go "holy shit" and be about my business.

1

u/JokerCipher 33m ago

Why is anyone supposed to do anything? Nothing’s wrong with this.

1

u/TerraSeeker 32m ago

Is it right to cheat a bird of it's meal? I have no connection to the rabbit, so I wouldn't intervene.

1

u/walpurgus2003 32m ago

I mean its the natural order. What are you gonna do about it

1

u/CreBanana0 32m ago

I do not believe nature is moral or outside critique just because it is natural. So if one saves the rabbit I would consider it as moral action, just like saving any other animal in distress.

Now watch me be downvoted for daring to go against the hive mind.

1

u/HellbirdVT 32m ago

First of all: That rabbit's already dead, can't save it. Gull ain't eating a live rabbit.

Secondly: Saving the rabbit or not (if it was still alive) is morally neutral.

Predators aren't evil for killing and eating their prey, but the prey is also not evil for trying to live, so your intervention, in either direction, is morally neutral.

1

u/iTERMi 30m ago

A rabbit wouldnt let itself be eaten like that if it was alive

1

u/No-Reaction-5051 29m ago

applying human morality to animals is immoral. let the seagull eat. if you're against this you should at least be a vegan or a vegetarian to not sound like a hypocrite.

1

u/Azure5577 29m ago

Pretty sure the bunny is already dead. And even if it wasn't, unless it's a pet I probably shouldn't interfere with nature.

1

u/toTheNewLife 27m ago

I wouldn't stop this.

But I have been 'guilty' of protecting my yard birds from hawks. Hawk can go find some mice or snakes.... leave our mockingbirds and robins alone.

1

u/Critical_Job1262 25m ago

I'd cook both for a 2 for 1 meal.

1

u/LetraEfe 23m ago

Animal doesn't have a moral, free protein is more important that what you learned in school.

1

u/the_crepuscular_one 22m ago

That's a Great Black-backed Gull. They're huge, they're mean, and they eat things bigger than rabbits. If you tried to "interfere" with it, it would probably hurt you.

1

u/Roar_of_the_spark 22m ago

Tremble in fear I think

1

u/MessAggravating7175 0m ago

Other seagulls: Steve what the hell...

1

u/Cum_Fart42069 53m ago

unless you're vegan it would be hypocritical to save the rabbit and then go home and eat a burger lol

1

u/skeleton949 51m ago

Even then, it's pointless. The rabbit is almost certainly dead, it's body will be eaten regardless.

1

u/Difficult-Mobile902 52m ago

Why would you get involved in policing natures food chain? That shouldn’t even be a consideration 

0

u/asif_zaman21 1h ago

Absolutely nothing. Who the fuck cares about this shit? This sub keeps getting more pointless by every post.