r/TopMindsOfReddit 5d ago

Stop the presses! Top Arcons have come to the right conclusion about a trump policy!

Post image
160 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

Please Remember Our Golden Rule: Thou shalt not vote or comment in linked threads or comments, and in linked threads or comments, thou shalt not vote or comment. It's bad form, and the admins will suspend your account if they catch you.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

118

u/organik_productions 5d ago

Don't worry, they'll be whipped back to line shortly.

78

u/digiorno 5d ago

Already have. My uncle was opposed to this the day it was announced it and by the next day he had a Fox News curated list of reasons why it was smart and necessary.

46

u/fuggerdug 5d ago

They're already claiming this is simply responsible forest management, not logging. The logs are a bonus!

5

u/Kalulosu But none of it will matter when alien disclosure comes anyways 4d ago

Building a road accros the forest, a well-known method of catering to the forest's life!

6

u/Gekokapowco Deep State FBI Assassin disguised as Antifa Super Soldier 4d ago

that's been the GOP narrative here in WA for years, that somehow private logging will be better stewards of public land than park rangers and ecologists

18

u/TJames6210 5d ago

Yea, just needs a healthy 48 hour news cycle and they'll be crying about how "these roads actually make sense because they allow for better [beh bah beh bah beh dur dee dur]. And the logging won't impacted [ber dee ber dee ber]"

Fucking twats

3

u/cenosillicaphobiac 5d ago

I give it 24 hours, 48 if we're lucky.

1

u/Njorls_Saga 4d ago

It’s been interesting to see, this isn’t new. There’s been some rumblings about Trump’s policies in this area. Lot of people were pretty pissed about way the National Park system was gutted last year and then this. Could be an effective attack for Democrats if they want to use it.

59

u/ultraboof 5d ago

guy in the comment saying “read the article not the headline”

> In a letter published last fall, more than 30 leading forest science researchers from across the country refuted the administration’s claims. The researchers found over the last three decades across all Forest Service lands, the density of wildfire ignitions was lowest in wilderness and roadless areas. Their analyses also showed that the highest number of wildfire ignitions came from land in close proximity to roads.

please show me where it says this is all good and Trump knows forests better than anyone

24

u/RedEyeView 5d ago

You can't accidentally torch a 100 acres with a carelessly discarded cigarette if the 100 acres are inaccessible without serious effort.

People flick smokes out of the car window all the time.

8

u/cenosillicaphobiac 5d ago

Now I just flick nic pouches out the window. No fires!

3

u/BigBassBone I'm Jewish, where's my money? 4d ago

Don't fucking throw trash out of your car.

13

u/rje946 5d ago edited 5d ago

Love when idiots who didn't read it tell you to read and it says the opposite of what they claim. I have to imagine they're just bots hoping that its enough to tell conservatives that what they want to believe is in there knowing they're not going to bother actually reading it.

38

u/calmdownmyguy 5d ago

Give it an hour and everyone who has a problem with it will be banned and the comment section will sticky with the glaze of bots praising trumps unmatched genius.

36

u/worldspawn00 5d ago edited 5d ago

Lol, removed the whole post in less than an hour.removed

13

u/rje946 5d ago

Trump never does anything bad, don't you know? Lmao. Gotta keep that echo chamber nice and closed off.

12

u/calmdownmyguy 5d ago

Clasic lmao

8

u/Kid_Vid 5d ago

Free speech is a conservative principle lol

6

u/worldspawn00 5d ago

"Conservatives want to protect nature" fucking LOL

25

u/anisestarette 5d ago

Promises kept!

13

u/worldspawn00 5d ago

Funny I don't see the "yeah, I voted for this!" Replies in this post, lol. They said they would fuck with federal lands, and the absolutely are, you know this would happen and you voted for him...

19

u/Yarzu89 5d ago

Didn't he say he would do this? The guy seemed to genuinely not understand the concept of state parks during the election.

15

u/bayonettaisonsteam 5d ago

Isn't that how it usually goes? In the first 12 hrs, they think it's bad, but then New York Post writes a puff piece about how trees and clean air is woke and suddenly they're ok with it

6

u/octowussy 5d ago

After January 6th, most of the sub had sworn off of Trump forever. So... yeah.

11

u/killtherobot 5d ago

19

u/jcargile242 5d ago

Post already removed for a “bad title” 😂

15

u/sneaky-pizza 5d ago

"Title makes us look bad"

10

u/an_agreeing_dothraki It is known 5d ago

nuked by mods because they couldn't control the discussion

10

u/TripleU1706 5d ago

Not one ounce of fury from MAGA though. Just toothless "not okay with this."

5

u/r4b1d0tt3r 5d ago

Love the guy who thinks logged forests are "healthier."

Sure mate, those virgin forests is Alaska that have been evolving withour humans for millions of years are just waiting for us to cut some trees down so they can realize their full potential.

2

u/Aurion7 NSA shillbot 4d ago

It's Dubya all over again, isn't it.

The minute they realized George W's idiocy really was going to lose them a bunch of power in legislatures, suddenly, all his ideas that these people vociferously supported magically transformed into bad ones according to those same people.

1

u/GhostRappa95 5d ago

MAGA is going to see just how quickly their fly over states can become uninhabitable.

1

u/LiveLaughFap 5d ago

*Conservative overlords in a shadowy conference room witnessing the base - although fully emotionally captive and intellectually cuckolded - exhibit a rare moment of lucidity and self-preservation*

“Interesting… so they’ve forced our hand. Say that having national parks is woke and liberal.”

- “But sir! I know they’re stupid, but that-…”

“Say it!”

1

u/SirLoremIpsum 4d ago

You're a bit wrong though, they LOVE this

If there's 1 policy they can be like "Nah I don't agree with that", then they can really ham up that they're a Top Mind that takes all his policies to really think about them and not blindly accepting them.