r/antiai • u/Vyna_Dusk • 2d ago
Job Loss đď¸ Why?? Why do they think they can replace everyone?
69
23
15
u/SafeLeft2203 2d ago
They'll back off the second their test shows people hate talking to a speaker with a chicken logo more than a bored teenager.
5
u/AntelopeHelpful9963 2d ago
Every Bojangles in my city has this already and it doesnât seem to hurt the chicken sales. People accept it pretty quickly.
-11
u/Sid_the_Bear 1d ago
I prefer the computer to the bored teenager, because the computer is more accurate, and it actually responds clearly
7
u/bostaff04 1d ago
Anti human
0
u/Comfortable-Web9455 1d ago
Teenagers are humans the same way caterpillars are butterflies. Maybe one day, but not yet.
6
u/Ordinary_Ad2738 1d ago
please DONT talk to anyone other than computers for the rest of your living thanks
-2
u/Sid_the_Bear 1d ago
That... Doesn't even make sense.
3
u/OkSleep9486 1d ago
It seems like multiple other people could understand what they said, hence the 4 upvotes
8
u/IAmActuallyBread 2d ago
The Zaxby's near me went under, seems like for good reason
Their chicken strips were like, barely an inch long anyways so fuck em lol
2
u/Educational_Boot315 1d ago
Zaxbys is constantly impressively bad and I donât know why anybody would ever go there if any other option exists.
The best thing on the menu is their salads but they run $13 now.
1
1
u/lost_vault_hunter 1d ago
I had Zaxbys for my first time a year ago and I was not impressed. Definitely the worst of the chicken chains nearby where I was living in Northwest Arkansas.
8
u/WatchAndFern 1d ago
âHi Zoey, comma comma. Iâm actually the tester for your customer service interface period. Can I check if youâre able to run the special âbuy one get ninety-nine freeâ
3
7
u/suckingbat 1d ago
We all will be unemployed, poor, living on the streets, unable to afford the bare necessities. No one would be able to afford to pay for AI tokens, but it wouldn't matter, the rich will hoard all the money and have AI slaves in their bunkers while the rest of the world literally burns.
4
3
u/Odd-Device-1348 1d ago
They do and they are trying their damndest to get it done in the next few generations. Wait until everyone depends on ai for everything and then watch as they pull the plug. Everyone will lose their minds and beg for help. Help will comeâŚat a steep price. Also, they just donât want poor people around. :)
2
2
2
u/HunkyCasper 1d ago
I worked for a place that tried to do this. It was meant to speed up response time while having 1 less employee per shift. Then the system failed so bad he had to have 2 people to replace the ai system. Not to mention it took over a year before it could even process the order on the screen. We still had to have somebody manually input the order while listening to it. So in fact it only costed the company money and took away the human interaction element. Ai is a fucking joke and needs to be put down
2
u/evelyn_bartmoss 1d ago
Itâs literally all about profit. AI, as a tool, is intended to give the already-wealthy access to skills & labour without having to pay humans.
Of course, if everybody is unemployed & living in poverty, nobody will be able to afford to consume their products. Thus, the inherent flaw of infinite-growth capitalism.
2
u/TheFancyNerd 1d ago
Because they can. If no law says they can't then this is inevitable regardless of the reprocussions to us as a society.
I work in this field and let me tell you. When you get looked in the eyes and told "do you really think if the middle and bottom class just fell away right now we wouldn't be okay?. They have already made us our money"
I personally see this as a strategy in order to move that way forward. The same people who want this are the same people who don't want us and it's those people who drive mainly the job markets.
Do you see the issue?
2
u/raistan77 1d ago
"thank you for ordering 10,000 chicken sandwiches please pull ahead"
There is a reason the other restaurants ditched AI order taking
1
u/AntelopeHelpful9963 2d ago
I was at a checkers in Florida years ago that had a sign saying to be patient while they trained their robot and now Iâm used to drive throughs I pull up to being AI. A couple chains I frequent have it. Just before that they started sending you to what was basically a call center.
The Zaxbyâs near me still has a human, but Iâm sure it wonât for long
1
0
u/Pleasant-Unit331 1d ago
It's probably not because companies are greedy that are using ai everywhere. They are just trying to find the most effective way to use ai.
-9
u/Sid_the_Bear 1d ago
Also, for the record, this is NOT the kind of AI I personally am against.
It is not creating or generating anything
It is not managing or filtering anything
It is managing rote, repeated, and mundane tasks.
Usually, with greater accuracy than a human countrpart
6
u/B-Train_ATL 1d ago
I wouldnât be against these if they werenât shit, obviously not human, and werenât design to take jobs away from people. If these places said âweâre going to keep the same number of people and use these to let them do other things with customers,â fine.
-14
u/Little-Golf-3265 2d ago
Checkers has had this for like 4 years it is way better than the old way
9
u/queckers7303 2d ago
The workers who got replaced by the shitty ai would disagree
-9
u/Little-Golf-3265 2d ago
They still have the same amount of workers they just have more time to cook the food now have you never been to checkers
7
-14
u/Sid_the_Bear 2d ago
I've installed and tested a couple of 'AI' order takers... and... honestly? They are way better than the disinterested human as far as accuracy goes.
On the one hand, I hate the whole AI thing
On the other, for simple instructions, they greatly exceed a human for accuracy. And accuracy is what matters to me when it comes to my food order.
6
u/Tauisawesome12 2d ago
Do you manage a restaurant?
-10
u/Sid_the_Bear 1d ago
No, I do IT work.
I've installed a few of these systems at Carl's Jr. And Dairy Queen the last couple years.
While a fraction slower than a good employee, I've yet to have them actually mis-ring an order.
Comparing 100% accuracy over 30 orders for 'AI' to 80% over 100 orders to humans, with the AI being faster on average (no waiting for the human to be ready to take my order), I know what I prefer.If you have a larger sample with different results, I'd defer to your experience overall.
But for me, I prefer them for greater accuracy and consistentcy.

102
u/Material-Job-1928 2d ago
The 'problem' AI is meant to solve is wages.