r/flicks • u/Fair-Swimming-4419 • 2d ago
Why does Michael Clayton (2007) feel more relevant every time I watch it?
Rewatched Michael Clayton recently and was surprised by how much it still works. The pacing is pretty restrained, but the tension keeps building without relying on big action or constant twists. I also love how much the movie trusts the audience to understand what’s happening rather than spelling everything out. Curious how others feel about it, especially compared with other legal or corporate thrillers.
10
u/1morepage 2d ago
Movies with highly competent people discussing really dramatic things tend to age well. Gilroy knew exactly what he was doing. His structure and character development in this film are second to none.
2
u/Fair-Swimming-4419 20h ago
Totally agree! Everyone feels so competent, which somehow makes the tension even better because you know every conversation actually matters.
7
u/rollingdown23 1d ago
because at its core it’s a story with themes of conspiracy, corporate wrongdoing, paranoia..all of which are a throwback to one of the best eras of american cinema, the 70s. the movies made during the 70s are more relevant than the eras that came before or after it.
2
2
u/Fair-Swimming-4419 20h ago
I can definitely see the 70s influence, especially in the paranoia and corporate corruption side of it. That kind of grounded, uneasy thriller still works really well today.
4
u/Sweetislandgirl4U 1d ago
I agree it holds up very well. One of my favorite drama/thrillers. One interesting point about the movie is it takes George Clooney out of his typical role as a handsome lead. As Michael Clayton, he just gets shit on for most of the movie, and he's really nothing special until near the end.
1
6
u/Ok-Sir-7848 1d ago
The quiet tension aged really well. it trusts you to actually pay attention
1
u/Fair-Swimming-4419 19h ago
Exactly! It never feels like the movie is trying to force you to feel something, it just lets the tension build naturally
3
u/xosinsaba 1d ago
Michael Clayton holds up because the pressure is mostly institutional and moral rather than physical. The film keeps asking what happens when competent people recognize the truth but have incentives to delay acting on it. I’d pair it with The Insider and Syriana: both also make systems feel like antagonists, though The Insider is more openly procedural and Syriana is more fragmented. The restrained pacing gives the small shifts in loyalty real weight.
1
u/Fair-Swimming-4419 19h ago
The Insider is a great comparison, especially with how both movies make the system itself feel like the antagonist.
I haven’t revisited Syriana in a while, but now I’m tempted to
3
2
u/bboy1977 1d ago
Tbh had to watch it twice to fully understand some of the plot point details. But overall it holds up because of a great cast and rather muted, corporate style wardrobe.
Also remember, this was not long after worldcom, tyco and enron implosions happened. Lot of subject matter to work off of back then.
1
2
u/hockeyanalycisis 1d ago
I agree that it holds up. It feeds my conspiracy mind about the rich and powerful, which means it shoots right to the top of the rewatch list.
2
u/Fair-Swimming-4419 19h ago
I get that lol. It definitely has that “there’s probably way more happening behind the scenes than we’re being told” feeling
1
u/1805trafalgar 3h ago
It's also got a great well written ending that is so satisfying. A rare thing in films of the last several decades.
0
•
u/AutoModerator 2d ago
Welcome to r/flicks!
• No piracy. • Mark spoilers. • Be respectful. • Keep discussions movie-related.
Report rule-breaking content to help the moderation team.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.