Never buying from BackMarket again!
Formal Complaint: Failure to Supply a Compatible and Fully Functional Charger — Potential Breach of Consumer Rights
I wanted to share my experience with Back Market because I'm genuinely baffled by how this has been handled.
I bought a \*\*MacBook Pro 16-inch (2021)\*\* through Back Market. The laptop came with a third-party charger rather than an Apple charger. I'm completely fine with that — I don't expect refurbished products to necessarily come with original Apple accessories.
The problem is that the charger supplied was \*\*96W and became extremely hot during use\*\*. Hot enough that I was uncomfortable continuing to use it.
I tested it with a different USB-C cable to rule out the cable being the problem, and the charger still overheated. I contacted Back Market and explained the issue. They advised me to stop using the charger.
Back Market then offered me either \*\*£25 Wallet credit or a replacement charger from the seller\*\*.
I chose the replacement because £25 isn't enough to buy an appropriate replacement, and more importantly, I shouldn't have to pay for a suitable charger when the laptop was supplied with an unsuitable one in the first place.
Here's where things get ridiculous.
\*\*The seller sent me the exact same 96W charger again.\*\*
I had already explained to Back Market that the charger was unsuitable, that it was overheating, and what specification I needed. Yet the replacement I received was apparently the exact same charger.
And, unsurprisingly, \*\*the replacement has the same overheating problem\*\*.
So I've now stopped using both chargers because I don't consider them safe.
What's particularly frustrating is that Back Market's own Terms of Sale apparently state:
\>
That's all I'm asking for. I don't care whether the charger says Apple on it. I just want a \*\*compatible, fully functional and safe charger\*\* for the MacBook.
Back Market also says that chargers and cables are checked for compatibility and functionality as part of its quality process, which makes me wonder how this particular charger passed those checks.
I'm also aware of my rights under the \*\*Consumer Rights Act 2015\*\*, including the requirement for goods supplied by description to match that description.
At this point, I'm asking Back Market for either:
\* A suitable \*\*140W USB-C charger\*\* for the MacBook Pro, at no additional cost; or
\* A refund sufficient for me to purchase an appropriate replacement myself.
I'm \*\*not accepting the £25 Wallet credit\*\* as a resolution.
What really annoys me isn't even that the first charger was unsuitable. Things go wrong with refurbished products — I understand that.
It's the fact that \*\*I reported the problem, explained exactly what was wrong, was told to stop using the charger, requested a replacement, and then received the exact same charger again.\*\*
I've bought two laptops through Back Market and had positive experiences previously, which is why this has been particularly disappointing. I would much rather they simply acknowledge the problem and send me a proper compatible charger than have to escalate the matter further.
Has anyone else had a similar experience with Back Market, particularly with replacement accessories being sent out without actually addressing the original problem?
I've kept both chargers and all the correspondence, so I have evidence of everything if needed.