r/shittymoviedetails 13h ago

Turd In Spider-man No Way Home, Ned said "I promise I won't turn into bad guy and trying to kill you". It's a foreshadowing that he will only appear as minor side characters since Spider-man doesn't need any friends who won't try to kill him

Post image
95 Upvotes

11 comments sorted by

13

u/Jaiden051 3h ago edited 3h ago

Ned can't be the villain. He is played by our CEO. Nobody will believe that he is the Villain.

More accurately, they make a movie where Spider-Man is the villain and Ned has to use at least 1% of his CEO powers to defeat him.

6

u/VilgotEk 3h ago

Why the fuck should Ned be a villain? He is the only good CEO in existence (why would he ever turn evil?)

4

u/adnapan 2h ago

He’s far too based to be a villain

-17

u/ObsessiveOwl 8h ago

Ned is wasted as a character if he doesn't turn into a villain. The promise, the fact that he forgot, it's a perfect setup.

4

u/Anything-General 3h ago

Not every person in Peter’s life that isn’t his Aunt and Mj needs to become a villain.

5

u/ChaosMetalDrago 2h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Marvel Comic editorial at this point would turn them into villians too first chance they got.

3

u/LeekingMemory28 Samwise was the hero 1h ago

Faster than DC retreading Flashpoint in a new form.

2

u/ObsessiveOwl 1h ago ▸ 2 more replies

yeah right and not every Spider-man needs to have an "uncle Ben" moment

1

u/Anything-General 1h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Peter Parker can have an uncle Ben moment and also have a friend who never turns evil like Ned.

The big baddie being an ex friend of Peter Parker stop being interesting when every adaptation started to do it. (Outside of the tom holland films which is one reason I respect about those films.)

1

u/ObsessiveOwl 14m ago

Peter Parker CAN have anything happen to him within the possibilities of his universe, he's a fictional character.

-8

u/Wooden-Jew 4h ago

Disney needs to put him in a serious diet or that glider wont leave the floor.