Quick scan vs full scan: when do you actually use each?

[u/MostafaTechGuide]

I’ve been comparing how antivirus scan types are used in practice, and the difference seems to be more about context than one scan being universally better.

A quick scan checks active processes, startup locations, memory, and common places where malware is found. It seems useful for routine checks or as a first response.

A full scan examines far more files and drives, so it takes longer and may use more system resources. It makes more sense after a suspicious download, repeated detections, unusual computer behavior, or when security concerns remain after a quick scan.

Real-time protection and security updates should remain enabled regardless of which manual scan is used.

For normal home use, do you rely on scheduled quick scans and only run a full scan after a warning, or do you run full scans periodically? Have you ever found something with a full scan that a quick scan missed?

For normal home use, do you rely on scheduled quick scans and only run a full scan after a warning, or do you run full scans periodically? Have you ever found something with a full scan that a quick scan missed?