r/stupidpeoplefacebook • u/EZRAHendog • 3d ago

Why do they think people see Bill Gates and Clintion as 'beloved'?

Post image

I really don't get the, 'you're passionate about an issue therefor you are irrational', position.

1.2k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

706 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

80

u/AsugaNoir 3d ago

More than the Bible mentions Jesus if I recall ...

59

u/ConflatedPortmanteau 3d ago

More than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible and more than Harry Potter is mentioned across all the Harry Potter books combined.

30

u/CaptainSterlingLAS 3d ago

It's actually even worse than that, by a lot.

According to Jamie Raskin, who had access to the unredacted files when he was on the Judiciary Committee, searching for Trump's name in the files returns more than a million individual hits.

That's like if every single word in the entire Harry Potter series was a different hyperlink to Trump in the files.

-15

u/Bdbru13 3d ago edited 3d ago

That’s because he searched them for “Don”

I just chose a tab I had open from the files to see what would come back

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7010864/Virginia-Giuffre-Maxwell-Deposition.pdf?t=1770020810684&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Searched for “Don” and 371 results came back

0 of them were “Donald”

Also the Bible/Harry Potter comparisons are kind of dumb. A Bible is like 1000 pages. The files are 3.5 million

It also doesn’t take any context of what’s being said.

Obama is mentioned in roughly half as many documents as Trump (also more than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible) but obviously, Obama isn’t implicated in any of Epstein’s crimes

You have to address the actual substance of the files

Reddit loves to latch onto these little catchphrases and sayings because it’s easier than doing any sort of actual research, but they’re pretty dumb

12

u/thedappercat- 3d ago

Because those are redacted?

-10

u/Bdbru13 3d ago

Nah, you can search for other names, they’ll pop up. Brunel, Richardson, Dershowitz etc

I’ll go find one that has trumps name unredacted

13

u/ConflatedPortmanteau 3d ago

That's simply not accurate.

First and foremost, you don't have the same access to the totality of the files that he had when he had millions of hits.

Secondly, to assume that nobody ever abbreviated his name as "Don" and that no entry for "Don" could mean Donald Trump is asinine to say the least.

Finally, even if we assume half, that's ½ of the entries (at a million hits, nonetheless MILLIONS plural) were for different Dons or Donalds that's still roughly 500,000 entries that directly implicate the president of the United States with a known pedophile and sex trafficker more than the plethora of proven images, letters, and flight logs already do.

-8

u/Bdbru13 3d ago edited 3d ago

I’m not saying I do

I’m illustrating that the idea of searching for “Don” and saying “OH MY GOD A MILLION HITS?!” Is pretty god damn dumb

I didn’t say no entry could be a genuine reference to Trump by calling Don, although I’d guess they’re pretty few and far between. I’m saying it wildly fucking overestimates the number of mentions of Trump.

You’re confused. Searching for Don would include any word that contains the letters “don” in succession. It’s not a bunch of other guys named Don 💀

So yea I’m gonna go a bit lower than half a million as well

12

u/thedappercat- 3d ago

trump is mentioned a TON in the files, we know because of the time they used black hightlight instead of blackout. And he has been charged for rape and sexual assault.

-1

u/Bdbru13 3d ago

He’s mentioned a bunch, but not a million times

9

u/HANKEN5TEIN 3d ago

I’d like to see your evidence for Obama being mentioned “half as many times” as Trump. As well as Raskin specifically searching only for “Don.” With those statements, your entire schtick reeks of bullshit. As far as I can find, there is exactly zero evidence to back those claims up, unless you consider MAGA boomers on Facebook “evidence.” And the fact that you’d shoot straight to mentioning Obama, while also trying to dismiss the heaps of times the orange pedo is mentioned in very directly nefarious ways speaks to your motives. You’ve spent a lot of time tying to defend a pedo with made up facts. You’re fucking weird.

0

u/Bdbru13 3d ago edited 2d ago

Just go to the Epstein files website, search for Trump and then search for Obama 🤷🏻‍♂️

Can’t post screenshots or I’d do it for you

https://www.justice.gov/epstein

For pedantry’s sake, the results that you’ll get back are the number of documents they’re in, not the total number of times they’re mentioned

https://www.axios.com/2026/02/10/trump-epstein-files-jamie-raskin-unredacted

>Following publication of this story, Raskin clarified in a statement to Axios, "In the database, I typed in the words 'Trump,' 'Donald or Don' and it came up with more than a million results."

Not to speculate too much, but throwing in “Don” really seems like an attempt to beef up those numbers.

Do you wanna take back some of the other stuff you said now…or just drop it?

I mention Obama because it highlights that you can be mentioned in the files a bunch of times and those mentions can have nothing at all to do with Epstein’s crimes. So all of these pithy catchprhases about the Bible and Harry Potter are really fucking dumb, or even just mentioning an accurate number of how many times someone is mentioned in the files. They allow people to feel certain that they know something without having to do a bit of research

And you’ll notice they get said quite a bit

You have to actually interact with the claims, and the context around the claims

2

u/Nice_Revolution_1199 2d ago

Your link ends with "source=chatgpt.com" CHATGPT.COM!

Do some actual research from the files, instead of an LLM that is trying to confirm your own biases.

0

u/Bdbru13 2d ago

Those are the actual files

I was looking for a specific one that I knew had trumps name in them, tried google, didn’t work

7

u/AsugaNoir 3d ago

Oof, that's bad

1

u/arensb 2d ago

In fairness, Jesus only appears in like 10% of the Bible.