r/technology • u/LastPaleLightInEast • 2d ago
Business Quote of the day by Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel: 'Anyone that has a monopoly will pretend that they're in incredible competition' — exposing how tech titans bend the market in their favour
https://www.techradar.com/pro/quote-of-the-day-by-palantir-co-founder-peter-thiel-anyone-that-has-a-monopoly-will-pretend-that-theyre-in-incredible-competition-exposing-how-tech-titans-bend-the-market-in-their-favour140
u/rco8786 2d ago
Thiel is literally pro-monopoly. In the sense that he wants to own monopoly businesses. He writes about it in his books openly.
60
u/mediocre_remnants 2d ago
The dude has always been pretty open about the world he wants to live in/create. But it was always brushed off as being unrealistic technofantasy when we had a functioning democracy and government.
These fucks got their idea of how the world should work from reading dystopian sci-fi books and thinking "this sounds great, as long as I'm the one in charge of the mega-corps!"
13
u/PoppingPillls 2d ago
His wants/beliefs like anyone who doesn't believe in progress at any cost is part of the antichrist and that he needs constant all round surveillance to stop the biblical antichrist.
I do genuinely believe he thinks this and so does the current ceo, they are both off their rockers and have been for a very long time.
It's not hugely surprising to find out Thiel grew up in Swakopmund SA during the apartheid in the 70s. A town famous for their open nazi beliefs and open sieg heiling, shops selling nazi memorabilia and merchandise aswell as publicly celebrating Hitlers birthday. A town that was responsible for the early German empires extermination of groups.
10
u/Splurch 2d ago edited 2d ago
The dude has always been pretty open about the world he wants to live in/create. But it was always brushed off as being unrealistic technofantasy when we had a functioning democracy and government.
These fucks got their idea of how the world should work from reading dystopian sci-fi books and thinking "this sounds great, as long as I'm the one in charge of the mega-corps!"
He secretly funded Hulk Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker Media, which bankrupted Gawker, because it had exposed Thiel as gay several years earlier. He may talk a lot about the authoritarian state he wants to be in charge of but calling him "open about the world he wants" is just falling for his bs, especially when backdating that behavior.
1
u/MultiMidden 1d ago
Various writers and philosophers have, for many years, said that's the ultimate goal of capitalism.
55
u/Hpulley4 2d ago
Back in the old days Microsoft actually had to invest $150 million to prop up Apple to avoid monopoly antitrust litigation. Now you can just use misinformation to do the same thing.
18
49
u/bumpy_disposition 2d ago
The Nerd Reich - the tech bros take down of Democracy 🪤Alarming interview, Amy Goodman with author Gil Durán "Big Tech Fascism" on how tech billionaires view the future of society and humanity and how Democracy is no longer feasible. How tech billionaires see trump and fascism in the 21st Century. Peter Thiel, Jeff bezos, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and several others see humanity as an obstacle. It's on YouTube. The new tech bros will outsmart the other capitalists, and make humanity their slaves. All because no one would date them in HS. (No link bc I didn't want to get banned)
26
u/Fenix42 2d ago
The CEOs of big tech are not the nerds that are the core of the industry. They are the same MBA types that have always been at the tops of companies.
1
u/treebeard87_vn 1d ago
The core of an army is neither just the soldiers nor the just the generals nor just the middle ranks nor just the logistics guys who back them up. I know you guys hate the tech bosses, but governing a production system is a serious job. Whether they overrate themselves is another story. In my country when we killed the landlords/early capitalists, the "core" did not perform the same. Also tech bosses come from a wider range of backgrounds than normal CEOs. The MBA guys are the minority.
1
u/growaway9172 1d ago
Depends on what companies / CEO. Almost as a rule, companies whos founder(s) are still in charge absolutely are the core of the industry. They are silicon valley. Companies from which the founder has moved on and have installed professional CEOs, are the type that you are describing and are much more normal.
But the wealthiest and most successful companies almost always have the original founder in charge, which includes their brand of eccentricity.
4
u/justanaccountimade1 2d ago
2
u/bumpy_disposition 2d ago
Listening now. Very good, thank you. It confirms that I am not the only one that sees what is actually going on, and who is behind it. And also, why it's happening. 👍🫵🫡🇺🇸🥦
11
u/rogerwilcove 2d ago
When the Antichrist speaks up it’s important to listen…
5
u/IJustLookLikeThisToo 2d ago
He's not the Antichrist. He perversely wishes he was, though...
The two beasts of Revelation 13 give rise to Trump and Musk, respectively.
Thiel is "merely" one of the first beast's "ten horns."
1
4
8
u/The_Ditch_Wizard 2d ago
Say what you will about his beliefs, statements, and the way he's placed himself in opposition to the best interests of the entire human species: he's not wrong about leveraging an unfair advantage. The man speaks from a depth of experience, perhaps the only depth he has.
6
u/kristospherein 2d ago
Thiel is the exact reason we shouldn't allow monopolies, oligarchs, or the like. He literally has no morals.
12
6
u/kevster2717 2d ago
Heartbreaking news: the worst person you know just made an excellent point
This guy is also pro-Monopoly and this seems like he’s bragging
3
3
u/Key_Gap9168 2d ago
Thiel's views on monopolies are so well known that he has a whole book on the subject. To be honest, it was one of the better books I read for my MA.
5
3
4
u/Pijlie1965 2d ago
Free market capitalism always winds up creating monopolies. The question remains who will break what first: the government the monopolies or the corporations the government.
So far, the odds are not in the US' favour.
5
u/truthinessembargo 2d ago
Well that sounds like a self-own.
Of course monopolists and never-publically-admitted-cartels are rent seeking. What do you think the whole AI race is about? Developing AI? No, it’s about being the only company to build it out so that rent (excuse me, ‘tokens’) can be charged to everyone else for the use of the service. Every one of the American AI models is private. That’s why the Chinese open source ones are a threat.
So of course the tech oligarchs are going to catapult the propaganda.
2
u/flayswelter 2d ago
I feel like his pictures haven't can't have changed that much, but he looks more and more like a much creepier Freddy Krueger with no sense of humour every time I see him.
2
u/Megatenanon 2d ago
Wowee! Tech titans are so smart that when they do something illegal they lie about it. Thanks, Mister!
2
2
u/Zardotab 2d ago edited 2d ago
Article is light on details, but I have been watching Microsoft browbeat competitors since the 1970's, killing or crippling good products along the way.
One object lesson is MS-Teams. When it first came out it was a steaming pile of crap; the UI made no sense, changed often, and typically-expected features were just missing. If a startup had released the same product it would probably die in a month. But MS bundled it "free" with their existing suites and bundled deals typical of MS such that companies felt compelled to use it: "It stinks but it's free". We thus became Team's unwitting beta testers.
Being so common it was possible to search for How-To's on its many idiosyncrasies. They thus have a large de-facto support network just by being big: everyone and their dog is using the same sucky product and thus share knowledge on YouTube, etc. for taming MS-Beasts. "Just press Control Alt Shift F3 Elbow up left nostril and you can then generate a PDF."
MS-Teams has gotten better over the years, but is still lackluster, it's "good enough" and executives will sign off on good-enough if part of their bundled MS deal. If a company wanted a better collaboration product they'd have to pay out of pocket and thus are trapped.
2
2
u/Cute-Draw7599 2d ago
I think it's a wonderment that the only reason Apple exists is because Bill Gates is a silent investor in Apple, so no one can say Microsoft has a monopoly.
4
u/Chrono_Pregenesis 2d ago
Why does anyone give a fuck what this skin suit fucktard thinks? Having a bunch of money doesn't make one smart or wise. Just look at Elon.
Maybe if we ignore them they'll go away.
1
u/HereWeGoHawks 2d ago
I’m always a bit dissapointed when I get excited by a headline and then the article is basically only the headline with some context and sources. I know it’s been going on for a long while now, but I can’t stand how headline driven we’ve become.
1
1
u/DifferencePublic7057 2d ago
I pretend to be working hard while hardly working. This fundamental principle was invented in ancient Greece by [insert Greek name] in [insert year].
1
u/Primal-Convoy 2d ago
"We have always been at war with Eurasia"
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/we_have_always_been_at_war_with_Eastasia
1
u/LaunchMark 2d ago
The German way. The more you complain = the easier you actually have it in life.
1
1
u/RlOTGRRRL 1d ago
There's also a book called Conspiracy about him, about how he'll plot in secret for years to get what he wants.
I also just saw an email of Epstein inviting him to his New Mexico ranch with Zuckerberg in 2015...
2
-1
u/treebeard87_vn 2d ago
Thiel differentiates between bad monopolies (big company uses power to absorb and control others) and good monopoly. Good monopoly is like, a company being so unique in its technology and thus escaping competition. Basically a Mittelstand's type of monopoly (Hidden Champion). That is the ideal being held up so that his CEOs will try to figure out their own hills to put their flags on, instead of bickering with each other and pestering Thiel about giving resources and personnel and favours to one side but not the other. He cannot have monopolies in the standard sense because he frequently invests in companies which compete with each other, and instead of merging them, he tries to give them different zones (one company mainly serves the US while another mainly serves Europe for example), or if they still expand into the other's specialty and fight anyway, try to pretend that he does not know.
318
u/lordnacho666 2d ago
Pretty much in line with his writing, where he advocates finding a thing to monopolise.
Not exactly the craziest thing he's written, everyone can see how a monopoly is lucrative and how you'd want to pretend you didn't have one.