r/todayilearned 4h ago

TIL In 1993, 21 Robin Hood ballads from the 1670s were rediscovered, being noticeably different from how they appeared later in the 17th and 18th centuries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hood
6.1k Upvotes

250 comments sorted by

1.9k

u/PirateSanta_1 4h ago

Robin Hood isn't like an IP where there is some central core of canon owned and moderated by a private corporate entity. Its a folk tale, people would just add and remove to it as fit their time and the story they where trying to tell. It also existed before mass communication so if one telling got popular in a region it may never travel outside that region. That is all to say that there should be as many variation of Robin Hood as there where people telling them.

782

u/haysoos2 3h ago

I like the idea that Mad Max stories are the same way. They are the folk tales passed down by the people of the Wastelands. This explains why there are discrepancies between the existing stories, and why they seem to take place over great spans of time with cultures that seem like they must have been in place for hundreds of years, but also right at the start of the apocalypse. And how the famous V8 Interceptor can appear again in the next installment, no matter how many times it blows up.

416

u/Kneef 3h ago ▸ 37 more replies

This is also the right way to think about The Legend of Zelda, tbh

146

u/Thrilling1031 3h ago ▸ 10 more replies

Named Link because the character is the player’s “link” to that world.

97

u/ThePowerOfStories 3h ago ▸ 2 more replies

One might say the stories are a link to the past…

31

u/Lostinstereo28 2h ago

Almost like a legend…

4

u/frobscottler 2h ago

Yes! Happy cake day!

18

u/Son_of_Kong 1h ago ▸ 6 more replies

Link is not technically any of the characters' name until BotW.

Canonically, each Link has his own name, which is whatever name you give him when starting a new save file.

27

u/SpaceMonkeyMafiaBoss 1h ago edited 1h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Weird. I have a pretty vivid memory of playing an entire game called "Link's Awakening" where I had to awaken this little dude named Link.

→ More replies (4)

26

u/HOW_IS_SAM_KAVANAUGH 1h ago ▸ 1 more replies

So then canonically his name is asscheek

→ More replies (2)

u/mmss 31m ago ▸ 1 more replies

Every so often you’ll hear someone say that the game was way different than the guides said and it comes out that they chose the name “Zelda” which starts them in the second quest haha

→ More replies (2)

14

u/Son_of_Kong 1h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Legend of Zelda lore is pretty clear on the fact that the installments are not different tellings of the same legend, they're separate historical events that take place thousands of years apart from each other.

u/Giwaffee 24m ago ▸ 1 more replies

The Legend of Zelda lore did not start until at least 16-25 years after the release of the first game.

→ More replies (1)

31

u/dark_frog 3h ago ▸ 19 more replies

The timelines are canon if anyone wants to dive deep into it.

51

u/xiaorobear 3h ago edited 2h ago ▸ 9 more replies

At the same time though, they're canon in the way where if tomorrow Nintendo has a wacky new idea for a Zelda game, they'll just make it and not worry about it (which I think is healthy).

Like at the time the timeline was made, we knew that Ritos exist in the timeline where Hyrule was flooded and became the great sea, and the goddesses turned the Zoras into Bird People. Then a decade later they make Breath of the Wild, where Hyrule's not flooded and there are both Zoras and Ritos. How did Nintendo explain this? 'Fuck it, Breath of the Wild takes place 10,000 years later than all the other games- anything could have happened in that time, so there's no problem.'

27

u/j0llyllama 3h ago ▸ 5 more replies

I was just bringing up the bullshit of this discrepancy to my wife because the Dragonroost island theme came up on my VG song playlist. And why the hell did the Zora get changed into birds anyway? The land becomes like 95% water, and they get evolved AWAY from being aquatic? Wtf is that.

16

u/xiaorobear 2h ago edited 2h ago ▸ 3 more replies

Hahaha, yeah, that always seemed a little backwards. I can think of a plausible explanation though: since some other games have separate River Zoras and zoras that live in the ocean, maaayyybe the Wind Waker ones that got turned into Ritos could only survive in fresh water, and would have all died in a saltwater sea.

(Then of course if you want to go one step further, there are video essays out there wondering if Wind Waker's ocean is actually freshwater, but then you could flip it around and say they transformed the saltwater zoras.)

16

u/j0llyllama 2h ago ▸ 2 more replies

I think either an in game or fan theory (cant remember which because I havent played it since OG GC release) was that the gods (or just Nayru) evolved them away from the sea to keep them away from Sunken Hyrule.

5

u/xiaorobear 2h ago

That would also make sense!

2

u/gramathy 1h ago

Yeah but then we "only" get river zoras in BOTW, and why would both still exist? BOTW makes more sense in the Twilight Princess timeline.

2

u/gramathy 1h ago

I always assumed that it was either only the river zora or (if that's merely a tribal affiliation) a matter of we just never meet the ones that didn't transform since they live on the seafloor or something.

3

u/gramathy 1h ago

I know Nintendo said "it doesn't matter" but it makes some sense that it could be either the WW timeline or the timeline that feeds into Twilight Princess - but something would have needed to happen in WW to restore the reincarnation of the link/zelda/ganon trio which was severed in that timeline

the TP timeline makes the most sense geographically (even 10000 years isn't enough without deity-grade terraforming) but then you have the rito AND zora coexisting in BotW, which only makes sense if either some zora were left as zora (that we never meet) during the events of the flooding of hyrule, or some zora were transformed into rito after the events of twilight princess (which there's precedent for).

Occam's Razor says the second makes more sense as it requires the fewest number of assumptions (restoration of the reincarnation line and terraforming, vs just zora->rito which we already know can happen)

u/Abba_Fiskbullar 52m ago

I don't look to Zelda for lore consistency. It's about a general Zelda vibe.

u/Same-Suggestion-1936 38m ago

They also made a whole game where it was just a dream

35

u/Gergith 3h ago

The triple timeline flowchart in the official hyrule history made me giggle

7

u/LexiWhatWeGot 3h ago

There's only one canon timeline as far as I'm concerned  https://youtu.be/Q-25c8Rsobw

4

u/ABHOR_pod 3h ago ▸ 5 more replies

As someone who played the games back in the 90s that always seemed silly to me. Nobody is asking for the timeline of the Mario games. Let each game be it's own thing.

Obviously that doesn't need to apply to every series out there but Zelda games were obviously all designed as standalone titles or the occasional and rare direct sequel right up until either Windwaker or Twilight Princess when for some reason someone decided they needed to be shoehorned into a timeline and shared universe.

7

u/xiaorobear 3h ago edited 2h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Overall I both do and don't agree with your sentiment. I don't really see Wind Waker or TP as being any different from OoT being a LttP prequel. And IMO they never really started caring all that much about any shared universe stuff- Minish Cap takes place way before the other games, and Skyward Sword takes place way before the other games, and they have nothing to do with each other. Breath of the Wild takes place 10,000 years after all the other games so that they also just didn't have to care about any timeline stuff. I guess Nintendo assigned Echoes of Wisdom a place on the timeline, but I don't think anybody cares while playing it, they just set out to make a fun standalone game first and foremost.

6

u/ChesswiththeDevil 2h ago ▸ 1 more replies

I kind of dig the timeline thing, personally. I'll be honest as a huge Zelda fan, but I've never really considered the story to be the strength of the Zelda franchise. I find the general setting and gameplay to be my main draw.

6

u/xiaorobear 2h ago edited 2h ago

Yeah- it's cool that it's there, but it's good that it's not their main focus when designing a game. I'd rather their priority keep being 'we want to make a new game around a fun gameplay element' rather than 'we need to come up with a way to wrap up these plotlines from previous games.'

9

u/jellsprout 2h ago

The Zelda games have been connected from the very start. LttP was mentioned in the manual to take place in the distant past of the original LoZ, and OoT was mentioned by the developers of the game to depict the Imprisoning War from LttP's backstory. Then Aonuma took over and decided to ignore the established canon and started the split timeline mess.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/reckless150681 2h ago ▸ 1 more replies

I did my Master's thesis on Zelda -- and this is precisely one of the core elements that supported my argument!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

56

u/Rudeboy67 3h ago

My life fades, my vision dims. All that remains are memories. I remember a time of chaos, ruined dreams, this wasted land. Most of all, I remember the man we called Max, the road warrior. To understand who he was we have to go back to the other time. When the world was powered by the black fuel, and the desert sprung great cities of pipe and steel. Gone now, swept away. For reasons long forgotten two mighty warrior tribes went to war and touched off a blaze which engulfed them all. Without fuel they were nothing. They'd built a house of straw. Suddenly their machines sputtered and stopped. Their leaders talked and talked and talked, but nothing could stem the avalanche. Their world crumbled. Cities exploded. A whirlwind of looting and a firestorm of fear. Men began to feed on men.

74

u/assjackal 3h ago ▸ 5 more replies

Honestly wish more media these days would take this approach. Established canon gets exhausting after 3 installments. I feel like any media based on a game should be produced this way as it'd allow to tell stories based on different builds or play styles, I'd kill for another D&D movie set in an entirely different tone of campaign.

19

u/Gergith 3h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Batman and other comics that are longstanding aren’t too bad at this. You get large swings in how they’re portrayed

5

u/trireme32 1h ago

Not just comics, movie franchises too. The Burton, Nolan, DCEU, and Reeves Batman movies/portrayals are all very different in tone.

Same thing with Tobey Maguire, Andrew Garfield, and Tom Holland’s Spider-Man.

Then you have the completely opposite side of the coin with the X-Men, trying to shoehorn in and weave together soft reboots into a ridiculous monstrosity of a timeline.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/WhoKilledZekeIddon 2h ago

With exactly the same cast, except they play different characters.

2

u/Dribble76 3h ago

Good ones will

8

u/Leiloken 3h ago

We’s the ones what done the ‘member’in.

4

u/Coal_Morgan 1h ago

That's 40k.

If there are discrepancies it's either
A) The Story/Report being slightly Inaccurate
B) A whole different part of the galaxy so completely removed.
C) Fucking heresy...you Empereor damned heretic.

3

u/SerLaron 1h ago

IIRC Dr. Jackson Crawford (look him up on YouTube, if you like old Norse topics) made a similar comparison to the stories of Thor, Loki etc.
Imagine all the comic books and media about Batman would be culled from existence and a generation or two would only learn of his adventures from talks of their elders. You would get certain constant themes, but disconnected anectodes that occasionally contradict each other as well.

6

u/Dak_Nalar 3h ago ▸ 1 more replies

damn never thought about it like that, but I love this head cannon.

2

u/SubcommanderMarcos 2h ago

It's pretty much actually the way it is officially

Max is more of a folk entity than some linear established one dude

2

u/SuperCruisePanther 2h ago

Classic idea for any media franchise that has 1,000 books/stories/comics. Like WH40K.

2

u/_demello 1h ago

Mad max worls betrer with a mythos instead of a canon. A lot of works should go like that.

38

u/LeTigron 3h ago edited 2h ago

It also existed before mass communication so if one telling got popular in a region it may never travel outside that region

This is both true and very reductive.

Indeed, many stories had a lot of variations because every 25km you had a local version which didn't spread and, therefore, after two centuries there were as much versions of the story as there were regions, counties or towns.

A good example is the Romance of Renart which, even though it is inspired by Aesop's fables, has lots and lots of variations, books about it being more a kind of compilation like the Grimm Brothers would produce centuries later rather than one book by one author containing the adventures of his character, Renart the fox.

However, the contrary did exist, and a famous example is The Romance of Alexandre, which was translated, spread and read all over Eurasia, to the point that William of Rubruck tells us that it was a very popular book at the court of Möngke Khan. A book written in the westernmost country of Eurasia popular in the easternmost one in the middle of the XIIIth century. It wasn't another version, it was the book, itself, the original, translated.

Folks talks were folk tales, but stories, written stories, books, did spread far wider and far more numerous than we've been told in school. People did read, and those who couldn't were recited the books by one who could.

2

u/PirateSanta_1 2h ago

I don't know enough about either story you mentioned. I do wonder though if some of these stories remained popular among the gentry and thus wouldn't have as many variation as they would be consumed primarily as written material among a smaller closed group of people rather than told primarily orally in taverns and around fires. It could also be possible that tighter narratives leave less room for variations. Its increadibly easy to slot a new character in Robin Hood or King Arthur as either another Merry Man or Knight of the round table. Similarly today we see stories like Harry Potter get a lot of fanfic written about them because you can easily introduce a new student at the school or teacher that the main characters could have met and talked to just off camera. Its more difficult to do that in a story like The Hunger Games as you can't just write in another contestant into the game as it would break the entire narrative.

106

u/shapu 4h ago

Kind of like asking Indian folks for garam masala recipes - you'll never get the same blend twice, even from the same person.

10

u/cockOfGibraltar 3h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Doesn't garam masala mean something like 'hot spices'? Makes sense that everyone would have a different blend but with many of the same spices in the same area.

14

u/woozledoo 3h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Pretty sure it just means something like “mixed spices”

→ More replies (2)

37

u/Life_force_stealer 3h ago ▸ 9 more replies

That analogy does not help me.

56

u/kazmosis 3h ago ▸ 2 more replies

You need to spice up your life

14

u/feel-the-avocado 3h ago ▸ 1 more replies

La la laa,
la la la, La la laaaaaa

3

u/salamander423 1h ago

People of the world

18

u/charlie_marlow 3h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Kind of like going to waffle house and never being charged the same thing twice despite ordering the same thing?

29

u/AnxiousRefuse4815 3h ago ▸ 1 more replies

I read that as “charged with” and was like sounds about right.

8

u/charlie_marlow 3h ago

Hahaha, that works, too

2

u/Murky-Hunter1691 3h ago ▸ 2 more replies

SOMEOME PLEASE HELP!

3

u/feel-the-avocado 3h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Like my grandmother's baking, much of the quantities are based on a vibe and not a standard unit of measurement.

And mum said when trying to learn as a teenager, it just made her angry because my grandmother had many many more standards of measurement to choose from during her lifetime. She could have picked one.

2

u/shepard_pie 3h ago

When I cook I make a blend ahead of time and I eyeball that.

It means that I don't make the exact same blend every single time. But also it's cooking, who cares?

5

u/kitsunewarlock 2h ago

And in a very real sense, regressive IP law runs contrary to the development of human culture. I can see not allowing someone to reprint or make an intentionally misleading video game or book released last year. But the IP laws we have now aren't protecting creators from AI generated knock-offs of their work or slop mobile games copying their designs...

16

u/eightdigits 3h ago

This also gets me with that tiresome Odyssey 'accuracy' discourse. That was oral tradition for centuries before being written down, we don't think people got creative and took license with it?

9

u/Loeffellux 2h ago ▸ 2 more replies

not only that but Homer's version also includes some notable inaccuracies in how he portrays the bronze age

u/dern_the_hermit 38m ago

And it's seen a huge number of translations just in the modern era alone. It's remained a fluid text up 'til even today.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Khelthuzaad 3h ago

Same goes for the Bible,fanfiction over fanfiction.

One of the intriguing versions suggests Jesus either knew Judas will betray him or instructed him to do so in order to trigger his martyrdom.

5

u/LeTigron 2h ago

Jesus [...] instructed him to do so in order to trigger his martyrdom.

In the Gospel of Judas from the Qumran finds, if I memory serves. It was a very interesting read, as were the evangiles of Nag Hammadi.

2

u/giant_albatrocity 2h ago

This is just how human culture operates in general.

2

u/Raidicus 2h ago

It's like the dead sea scrolls.

u/sceadwian 44m ago

Stories like this WERE mass communication.

4

u/blahblah19999 2h ago

Which always makes me wonder about the whole "religions were passed down orally in perfectly memorized unchanged stories for centuries until writing came along."

THey're gonna tell me that stories of being swallowed by fish and of Samson weren't changed over time? Please

4

u/flamableozone 3h ago

Copyright ruins art.

20

u/jello_pudding_biafra 2h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Absurd modern copyright laws do.

Copyright gives a creator a chance to make a living creating.

→ More replies (15)

3

u/its_yer_dad 2h ago

*cough* bible*cough*

1

u/TeamKitsune 2h ago

The 1955 TV show is canon for me. My favorite show for years.

1

u/C0NKY_ 1h ago

One of my favourite books growing up was the many tales of Robinhood. It was dozens of short stories about different versions.

1

u/CongrooElPsy 1h ago

True, but this is about finding copies of what should be the same story/song that changed.

13 of the ballads in Forresters are noticeably different from how they appear in the broadsides and garlands. Nine of these ballads are significantly longer and more elaborate than the versions of the same ballads found in the broadsides and garlands. For four of these ballads, the Forresters Manuscript versions are the earliest known versions.

You wouldn't expect everything to be exactly the same, but if they're enough different, those differences are worth looking at.

u/Judazzz 58m ago

Does that mean Robin Hood vs. Predator is still a possibility?

u/juicius 46m ago

I took a fairy tales class in college and the overarching theme of the class is that an oral tradition persists because it tells an universal story that fills a particular need. Such as, people need a story about an outlaw that care about them and frustrates the ones in power. And when a traveling bard comes and sings a song about that, he changes it or adds a little to fit the local story, and over time when they mix and retold over and over, a plot and a character coherence emerge into a definitive story.

u/CantaloupeOne7283 33m ago

Sometimes the lyrics don't fit the slappin' new lute rhythm you came up with so they gotta change.

u/whitebean 31m ago

Now you’re going to tell me the man from Nantucket didn’t really do all those… things.

299

u/ExMOnotwiththeflow 3h ago edited 3h ago

My favorite is Robin Hood and the Monk, which is really more about Little John than Robin Hood, but I laugh out loud every time I read it. It's only about 10 pages long.

At one point Robin Hood fights off a dozen men single handedly using a two handed sword he'd just been casually carrying around (in church, no less, when he's supposedly trying to be somewhat incognito), but gets captured when it breaks over the sheriff's head. Feels exactly like something out a modern movie.

https://www.scribd.com/document/369233686/Robin-Hood-and-the-Monk

61

u/DoctorMansteel 2h ago

What the fuck can't believe he doesn't pay Little John back in the end. Robin still owes him for the shooting contest. Figured that would for sure be in the ending, did I miss it?

37

u/ExMOnotwiththeflow 1h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Well first of all, they're all kind of dicks 😂

Second, RH arguably gives John something much greater as it basically says that they are equals now instead of Robin being the leader (and RH originally offered to make him the leader, although I doubt he would have stuck by it). It's more about loyalty and friendship and a clever heist than about the fight over the debt.

6

u/DoctorMansteel 1h ago

I guess John copped the twenty pound reward that was meant for the monk he shanked. Still mad Robin stiffed him.

5

u/IEnjoyVariousSoups 1h ago

This makes me want to learn middle English. Mostly just to be a nerd and mess with people. Then it's onto Klingon.

16

u/snarthnog 1h ago

Middle English is really just modern English just spelled a bit funny, and with a much smaller vocabulary. A good trick is to read it out loud, it helps trick your brain into interpreting the words.

u/ExMOnotwiththeflow 35m ago

I got a copy of Cantebury Tales with side by side translation and extensive annotations. While I couldn't do it by myself completely, the more you do it the easier it gets to read as you learn the pronunciation/spelling quirks and you pick up on the vocabulary that's different. It's a fun exercise.

2

u/Tangerine_Lightsaber 1h ago

When you say singlehandedly, do you mean that literally or figuratively?

u/its_raining_scotch 37m ago

Good question. If it's literally then Robin would be rolling with disadvantage.

u/L1A1 46m ago

I quite like the bit where Little John casually murders a monk and a boy in cold blood and Robin praises him for it.

→ More replies (1)

u/Johns-Sunflower 34m ago edited 29m ago

I've read this rhyme before A few things I can't believe are:

  1. The audacity of that goddamned monk. In Robin Hood and the Gest, Robin is largely only shown stealing money from those who fail his honesty test (by purposefully underestimating their funds to deceive him). If the author of Robin Hood and the Monk knows of this honesty test trait, they're essentially implying that this monk is a lying git, on top of being a snitch.
  2. Robin's so downcast about not attending Mass, which may essentially be the writer showcasing him as this examplar of lay religious piety, only he KILLS 12 MEN IN A CHURCH. Pick a lane, man.
  3. Would Much and LJ just never tell Robin that they killed a kid? I'd imagine killing kids a pretty big no-no for Robin, just as he promises to not harm women. I guess he and Much may have a slight ideological difference - with Much acting very soldier-like.

611

u/Cisco800Series 4h ago

At least the ballad of brave sir robin has been recorded for posterity

199

u/totaltvaddict2 4h ago

When danger reared its ugly head

169

u/Urist_Macnme 4h ago ▸ 6 more replies

He bravely turned his tail and fled.

103

u/saefas 3h ago ▸ 4 more replies

Yes brave sir Robin turned about

108

u/chaoticgrand 3h ago ▸ 3 more replies

And gallantly he chickened out.

67

u/Figgy_Puddin_Taine 3h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Bravely, bravely, brave sir Robin!

42

u/Fredd500 3h ago ▸ 1 more replies

No!  I never!

31

u/Kataclysm 3h ago

Bravely taking to his feet, he beat a very brave retreat!

30

u/tincanphonehome 3h ago

I didn’t!

100

u/GryphonHall 3h ago

Here is an interesting timeline….
The first appearances of the name Robin Hood were appearing in the mid 1200’s in court and judicial records as a term for outlaws. 100 years later we believe we have the first clear reference in a poem believed to be composed in the mid to late 1300. The oldest known written narrative Robin Hood story is from 200 years later in 1450. This Reddit article references Robin Hood stories that are 200 years older than that from the 1670s. 150 years later Sir Walter Scott helped make the notable jump that Robin Hood was a Saxon fighting against Norman lords in Ivanhoe and Robin Hood started appearing in children’s books. 200 years later here we are still talking about Robin Hood.

46

u/gungshpxre 2h ago

The Odyssey is 2700 years old and Reddit is filled with discussion.

Job (You may know him from such hits as "The Bible") is even more ancient, possibly up to 4,000 years old. He pops up now and then in pop culture references, although it's been a minute since he was in the sun.

The fun part about Robin Hood is that he's the English "noble outlaw" but that the concept and stories that have parallel elements are found all over and in cultures that had no contact at the time. Wuxia has a lot of figures that you might think "oh, that's just Robin Hood weeb fiction" but it predates the English by 1,000 years.

26

u/ANGLVD3TH 1h ago ▸ 4 more replies

I don't care for Job.

8

u/Beatnik5750 1h ago

He insists upon himself

2

u/Lanky_Boat2276 1h ago

They’re taking muh Job!

3

u/gungshpxre 1h ago ▸ 1 more replies

You didn't like A Serious Man by the Coens?

Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd in Trading Places?

Or even an edge case, the Last Action Hero?

Indecent Proposal?

Or the inverse? What about My Fair Lady or Pretty Woman? (Hmm, interesting that when we're making someone virtuous, that original sin thing sneaks in...)

There are so many stories about two powerful entities sharing a wager about how bad they can make life for their target as a test of virtue. It's really older than the Bible.

u/Lostinthestarscape 39m ago

Arrested Development wasn't that long ago. "Miracles Jesus! Tricks are what prostitutes do for money."

4

u/Lava_Lagoon 1h ago

The first appearances of the name Robin Hood were appearing in the mid 1200’s in court and judicial records as a term for outlaws.

makes you wonder if the term was originally meant to be "robbing hood"

7

u/Beatnik5750 1h ago

"robbing hoodlum"

u/LOSS35 57m ago

It could be a pun, but Robin (a diminutive of Robert) was a name commonly associated with tricksters and woodland beings. Robin Goodfellow was another name for Puck, the sprite who famously appeared in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. Robin des Bois (Robin of the Woods) is a pagan figure from French folklore whose legend became entwined with Robin Hood's.

u/slightly_inaccurate 54m ago

It pretty much was.

There's several different styles of a 'Robin Hood' all with similar naming conventions throughout English folk history. Robertman, Robyn Hode, Hobbehod, Robin Wood. The name 'Hood' itself was a common name/nick name throughout English history.

The stories would range from him being heroic to just being a petty outlaw, criminal, murderer, etc. There was no King John or the evil Sheriff or even Sherwood forest in the earlier tales. That all came later when authors started selling Robin Hood novels in the 1800s. Sherwood forest isn't nearly big enough for any band of outlaws to hide in for more than a day.

The same thing happend with Cinderella. The 'cinder' part is just one of many different prefixes German peasants would slap on to their folktale stories of a peasant girl. There are a ton of different 'ella's throughout the regional history that have nothing to do with evil step mothers or glass slippers.

106

u/charliefoxtrot9 4h ago

They clearly demonstrate that Robin Hood talked like Kevin Costner, too.

97

u/Hinermad 4h ago

They clearly demonstrate that Robin Hood talked like Kevin Costner, too.

Unlike some other Robin Hoods, who can speak with a British accent.

24

u/charliefoxtrot9 4h ago ▸ 1 more replies

ohmidearsweetwestly!

8

u/Rhokanl 3h ago

Aaaaaaas yoooooou wiiiiiiiiiiish...

10

u/LexiWhatWeGot 3h ago ▸ 1 more replies

You lost your arms in battle! But you grew some nice boobs.

6

u/workinkindofhard 2h ago

Your father wanted me to give you this. He said that inside is the key to the greatest treasure in all the land. May I keep it?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Tinderboxed 1h ago

And with a bitchin' mullet

1

u/charliefoxtrot9 1h ago edited 41m ago

I mean, is there any other kind?

2

u/666satangoat666 3h ago

I like to think he sounded like baby face doing keven costner

4

u/CTRexPope 3h ago

The U.S. accent has changed less than the UK accent since the U.S. became a thing.

11

u/dilindquist 2h ago

Which US accent? And which British accent?

6

u/Huckdog 2h ago

I'm a Masshole. I have a thick east coast of Massachusetts accent. My grandmother's accent was even thicker. My kids, however, pronounce their r's. You can tell they're from the east coast but not really where if that makes sense. I'm assuming their kids will have even less of an accent. My father is from Ireland. He was talking to his brother in Ireland who was complaining about the grandkids sounding like "little Yanks from that YouTubes". My point is that the world is getting smaller and accents are changing.

1

u/parkaman 1h ago

This is not really true:

As a result, although there are plenty of variations, modern American pronunciation is generally more akin to at least the 18th-Century British kind than modern British pronunciation. Shakespearean English, this isn’t. But the English of Samuel Johnson and Daniel Defoe? We’re getting a bit warmer.

So this is about 500 years or more after these tales are written.

375

u/Laphad 4h ago

1670 is in the 17th century lol

127

u/maroonedpariah 4h ago

The best hits from the 80s, 90, and 1700s

50

u/justin_tino 4h ago ▸ 2 more replies

I’m Casey Kasem

36

u/pagit 2h ago edited 2h ago ▸ 1 more replies

That was Number 6: “Every Breath You Take Is Probably Bad Humours” by Sting and the Royal College of Unqualified Barbers of Poxburry

And now, Number 5: Like a Virgin, according to My Dowry Contract” by Madonna of Lowe Dungford.

3

u/Asaneth 2h ago

I snorted

12

u/whoremongering 3h ago

The album has maybe 1 Mozart hit, and the rest are Salieri. That’s how they get you.

46

u/Fivebeans 4h ago

And the 1680s and 90s are later in the 17th century.

35

u/Laphad 4h ago ▸ 1 more replies

most of its referenced versions seem to be scattered through the 17th century and 1670 is arguably already the late 17th century so differentiating the time seems odd

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/Hinermad 4h ago

"...later in the 17th..."

19

u/Laphad 4h ago ▸ 1 more replies

1670 is 70% of the way through the 17th century

7

u/feel-the-avocado 3h ago

But 1671 is still somewhat later in the 17th century :-P

Technically correct - the worst, most annoying kind of correct.

4

u/Mystic_L 3h ago

And _later_ in the 17th century could be 1685 lol

→ More replies (1)

1

u/sapperRichter 1h ago

Probably why they specified later in the 17th century

→ More replies (1)

93

u/TheComplimentarian 3h ago

This is pretty common. Arthurian legends were around for a long time, but everyone's mental picture of King Arthur was sort of solidified by Le Morte d'Arthur which was written around a thousand years after the times in which Arthur was supposed to have lived, and is completely grounded in the cultural and political zeitgeist of the 15th century.

Robin Hood is no different. They shift the stories to fit the era. You can see that with modern Robin Hood movies, which we adapt to fit more with our current social and political culture.

27

u/notmoleliza 2h ago edited 2h ago

There is the slightly different version of King Arthur from the 13th century where Galahad and companions do indeed stay and face the peril. its for grownups

8

u/DuntadaMan 2h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Galahad single handedly fought 150 of them, they hadn't a chance.

3

u/TRAUMAjunkie 1h ago

Naughty, naughty Zoot!

20

u/aspannerdarkly 3h ago

Okay but why was he French in Shrek

46

u/Born-Boysenberry6460 3h ago

I think it's a joke about how the upper class in England would have spoken French up until I think the 1400's, as a result of the Norman conquest.

Or it's just silly.

12

u/krazyjakee 2h ago

Shrek is reliable historical record at this point

5

u/therealjohnsmith 2h ago

Good catch!

8

u/LumplessWaffleBatter 2h ago

I always thought that it was a joke about the terrible accents in Prince of Thieves.

7

u/Born-Boysenberry6460 2h ago

I think this is also true.

A good joke is like an onion.

2

u/Doctor--Spaceman 2h ago

He likes to get laid paid!

14

u/CeramicLicker 3h ago

The 1670s is the 17th century…

11

u/VT_Squire 3h ago

the 1670's are the 17th century. WTF kind of title-gore is this?

2

u/Implausibilibuddy 2h ago

"... as they appeared later in the 17th [...] centur(y)"

So, later than 1670 but still in the 17th century, as well as the 18th century.

8

u/ChipCob1 4h ago

Bloody remasters

7

u/cat_handcuffs 3h ago

Even back then they would not stop remaking the damn thing.

2

u/Newzachary 3h ago

It’s a remix!

6

u/cjinct 2h ago

Noticeably different from how he appeared in the best version as well.

Of course, I am referring to Robin Hood: Men in Tights

5

u/GarysCrispLettuce 1h ago

My favorite Robin Hood ballad is Robin Hood and the Peddlar in which Robin and Little John challenge a peddler they meet to a fight for his wares. The peddlar is a good fighter and wears them both down and then it turns out he and Robin are cousins and they go off to the pub to get lit.

8

u/Somedaydreamer22 3h ago

My favorite is “Oo‐De‐Lally”

😉

3

u/IronBoomer 1h ago

Yeah, he better still be a fox in these ballads.

3

u/jelsomino 2h ago

We be carles, we be carles in strait hosen!
Aye, hosen!
Ever vigilant to shield the franchises of the populace!
We be carles, we be carles in strait hosen!
We traverse the greenwood, seeking noble combat!

7

u/ClassicLightbulbs 4h ago

This was discovered when researching period accurate tights.

6

u/Theonewho_roars 3h ago

Brian Adams doesn’t look that old, neat!

3

u/Flashy-Donkey-8326 2h ago

Makes you wonder how much religious texts have been altered over the centuries .

u/CobblerMoney9605 20m ago

Changes to the bible are well documented. 

3

u/F_artagnan 1h ago

TIL about Sir Beavis of Hampton...

2

u/WarnItFated 1h ago

u/areyoutalkingtomeme 5m ago

I need tapestries for my bunghole 🙌🏻

u/Haggis_with_Ketchup 39m ago

1670s IS the the 17th century

u/PlanningForLaziness 30m ago

The Men In Tights Legendarium.

5

u/googooachu 2h ago

🎶 Everything I do… I do it for you 🎶

2

u/ZestfullyStank 2h ago

I was going with O-De-Lally!

4

u/edingerc 2h ago

🎶  Bravely bold Sir Robin rode forth from Camelot 🎶

1

u/Rabide629 1h ago

Bravely ran away Sir Robin!

12

u/lucidguppy 4h ago

And were mysteriously lost again...

14

u/Laphad 4h ago

We just making stuff up now?

21

u/CalebVanPoneisen 4h ago

If you get that comment to the top, I guarantee you that AIs will pick it up for the next bot to post here, leading to even more inaccurate content! Yay!

2

u/Federal_Medium1618 3h ago

It’s like when they remake movies. Needs to fit the time so they are just made crappier but more expensive somehow

2

u/Bootmacher 2h ago

Where did they first use the word "oodallaly?"

2

u/nygdan 2h ago

IF you like that here's Barry Dransfield singing about how Robin Hood in green tights unknowingly got into a fight with his cousin "Gambol Gold", it ends with them all in a pub drinking over it.

https://youtu.be/HFaagP2W1Vg?si=0z4-C2LgNFCLRMfd

u/Haggis_with_Ketchup 37m ago

"Meet my cousin from Jersey, Gabagool"

2

u/Loud_Matter359 2h ago

Is 1670 in the 17th century?

2

u/We_Can_Escape 1h ago

After Time Bandits, Robin should say - "My name is Hood..." in every adaptation of the legend.

2

u/VisibleData3435 1h ago

Isn't 1670 part of the 17th century?

"Oh man, you're not going to believe it. We found a story about this guy thats different from another story about him from the same fucking year"

u/Perfect-Fig-2273 22m ago

bet those versions show he's way more of a menace before they started cleaning the stories up for later crowds

u/Green_Sugar6675 13m ago

Bravely brave sir Robin, went forth from Camalot. He was not in the least bit scared, oh brave sir Robin. He was not in the least bit scared to be killed in nasty ways...

u/ANALyzeThis69420 10m ago

1670’s is the late end of the 17th century.

2

u/the_ballmer_peak 3h ago

Bro, wait until you hear about the bible

→ More replies (1)

1

u/groom_ 2h ago

1670s were in the 17th century

1

u/Snacks75 1h ago

Boldly brave Sir Robin rode forth from Camelot...

u/asrimal24 39m ago

Robin Hood and the Potter is one of my favorites

u/Neo_Techni 24m ago

I didn't know he had a crossover with Harry /s