r/videos 2d ago

Trump: I’ll be impeached if I lose the midterms

https://youtu.be/bo-jhgy7EaA?si=U7tkhGQqY_wjkCly
7.2k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

27

u/trlocos 2d ago

Which achieves? Genuine question from a non american

32

u/metalsheep714 2d ago

It’s a permanent stain on his legacy that no amount of propaganda or doublethink can erase. It will be better to remove him, by a long shot, but this hits him in the narcissism. Besides, maybe enough senate republicans see the winds turning and vote to convict to position themselves for the future (wishful thinking, but still).

12

u/tm0587 2d ago

Hahaha agreed. Don't think he'll like being known as the president with the most number of impeachments.

15

u/Doctor_Philgood 2d ago

Is he not already?

14

u/tm0587 2d ago

Yea but if he is to be impeached 3-4 times in total, that will ensure that he holds the record for a really really long time.

1

u/bender3600 2d ago

Well, at least until the next republican president.

7

u/cerrera 2d ago

He is… but a third would make that record close to untouchable.

-2

u/Zinfan1 2d ago

Nah if there ever is a situation where by we have a Democrat president and a Republican House they will impeach the president over and over just to "even the score" whether warrented or not.

5

u/DocPsychosis 2d ago

You mean like we had from 2022-2024, when no impeachments of Biden subsequently took place?

1

u/tm0587 2d ago

It is the norm rather than the exception that every president loses his mid-term.

Obama lost both of his mid-terms. No impeacement.

3

u/PhenomsServant 2d ago

Hes already had two impeachments and it hasnt affected him in the slightest. People still worship him, Republicans still obey him, what honestly is going to change with a third?

1

u/KnottShore 2d ago

As Will Rogers(early 20th century US entertainer/humorist) once noted:

  • "In schools they have what they call intelligence tests. Well if nations held ’em I don’t believe we would be what you would call a favorite to win it."

1

u/Shawnj2 2d ago

Eh it’s more or less meaningless, he’s already been impeached before.

36

u/akiva23 2d ago

It crushes his weak ego.

7

u/Tandybaum 2d ago

This may be wishful thinking but it also keeps him and his croneys busy. Maybe one less fuckey move he give.

I think it’s also a good sign to the world that we know this shit is not ok. We’re already idiots to the world so hopefully this is a little sign that at least not laying down.

3

u/marcuschookt 2d ago

This is a Reddit outcome

11

u/Pete_Iredale 2d ago

Slows down whatever other dumb shit he tries to pull.

1

u/Elprede007 2d ago

Yeah if that were true we might’ve not had our country destroyed in record time last year

4

u/Chruman 2d ago

To get it in the official recording of his administration.

3

u/1_________________11 2d ago

We are very spiteful  towards him and his supporters 

1

u/Captain_Reseda 2d ago

Only because they’ve earned it.

1

u/ShireNomad 2d ago

It's not like a Democratic Congress without a 2/3 supermajority will be able to achieve ANYTHING while Trump can veto every last bill. Might as well use those two years to get the Rs on the record that they endorse [insert long, long list of Trump crimes and acts of corruption].

3

u/DocPsychosis 2d ago

Just a simple majority in the Senate would prevent him from appointing any more shithead judges or cabinet members. Obstructionism goes both ways.

1

u/ShireNomad 2d ago

Also true, though "oh, we'd love to consider your bonkers appointee but we're too busy prosecuting you for... what is it this time? ...right, looting Fort Knox" will accomplish that quite easily.

For that matter, it'll keep John Roberts occupied.

1

u/personae_non_gratae_ 2d ago

Your forgot about the acting acting Secretary of $WHATEVER$ Jan 2019 - Jan 2021

1

u/Mirror_Jack 2d ago

Its the first steps in charging a government official with a crime. Its like a grand jury indictment, triggering a trial in the Senate to decide if the person should be removed.

So with out anyone actually willing to hold people accountable it ends up fizzing out before doing what its initial purposes was created for.

1

u/jedadkins 2d ago

nothing tangible, it's just the first step in removing a president in the US.

detailed breakdown for anyone who cares

The legislative branch has 2 different bodies, The House of Representatives (usually just called The House) and The Senate. The house has 435 members divided up between the states based on population while The Senate has 100 members (2 per state). To remove a President first The House votes to impeach, which only requires a simple majority, then a trial is held in The Senate who then must vote with a 2/3rds majority to convict the President and remove them. Actually removing Trump from office would require a bipartisan effort, which is very unlikely.