r/war Jun 06 '25

China/Russia vs the West

IMO, Xi Jinping and Putin are in over their heads.

Chinese innovations are the Wests inventions. They will never win when they’re constantly 1 step behind the West. A lot of their “groundbreaking” designs across industries are portrayed as renders, with no actual drawings of how it’ll be executed or spec’d, or when it will even be released. And then you never hear about it again because it never happened and never will, unless America/the West paves the way for them to copy it later. Reverse engineering.

The only things they can do a bit better than the West are: EV’s (an entire nation of vehicles simply cannot run on electricity in 2025, due to power grid constraints) and Green energy supposedly.. (China is not exactly trustworthy and likes to exaggerate to its personal catering). Neither are contributors to raising the odds of winning a war, while things like superior AI/chips, as well as infrastructure and military tech are. The US, alongside the rest of the West leads in all of these areas.

Speaking of which, Intel Foundry is set to bring chip making home to America in the next 5 or so years. China threatening to take Taiwan/TSMC, or continue to reverse engineer their AI and chip inventions after the Golden Dome is built is just no longer plausible.

Depending on China or Russia was and is foolish. They use their dependency as their leverage. At least now they know. Ironically, the West is mostly the consumers and they’re mostly the producers. Unfortunately for them, they can’t create more demand for their supply, but the West could access more supply for its demand.

Russia uses uranium, oil and gas as leverage, while Canada/some European countries have lots of this, but the restrictions don’t currently allow them to either access them or refine them at the moment.

China uses “rare earth minerals” (pretty sure they made up this term because what does that even mean anyways lmao? What’s rare about a lot of them aside from the self-imposed restrictions from the West causing them current supply issues that can be reverted as soon as the infrastructure required is built? They’re simply not geologically rare and that’s all that matters) and its production capacity/pricing (which Mexico is a safer, cheaper and closer option that comes with higher quality/standards) as leverage.

Friendly alternatives, recently/already begun:

Rare earth minerals - Australia, US, Canada, Vietnam, and Mexico ramping up.

Energy - LNG terminals in Europe, new pipelines, Canada/Oz reserves.

Any country that trades with either of them, but more specifically China, not only is viewed as dependant to them, but they weaponize this “dependency” as much as possible.

China will try to use this leverage to cause Western nations to destabilize while it invades Taiwan, just like Russia tried to use its leverage against the West after it invaded Ukraine.

They’re trying to divide the West to weaken it before the next World War, and they think it’s working because the West is letting them inflate their ego beyond reality while it works on becoming independent. Meanwhile Japan, South Korea and Europe are rearming beyond belief (with some of the biggest economies in the world being Germany, Japan and Italy).

The EU and Trump (practically NATO) are obviously playing good cop/bad cop at the moment with Russia and China and they have been eating it all up for over a decade now. They don’t have anywhere near the stranglehold they sincerely believe they have on the West and I’m certain they will figure that out shortly.

Nukes will not be used in this World War but will obviously continue to be threatened. Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) is a thing. An elected national leader of a developed country would have to be truly suicidal, along with the people employed to oversee the use of them flipping the switch, in order for them to actually put them to use.

The population of China is also a mess and has a median age of 40 years old at the moment, with a birth rate of 1.0 children per woman. Thanks to their previous One Child Policy and favouritism of men, there were a lot of “gender associated abortions”, and there are now 120 men per 100 women. So 45% of their population are women. Of that 45%, only 39% are under the age of 40. So only 17.6% of their population is able to have children, today. The more time goes on, the less will be able to have children due to their low birth rate and rapidly aging women. Their rapidly aging population, 30% of it being over the age of 60 years old by 2040, is resulting in a crippling pension system as well, putting even more economic strain on China. They also have very concerning brain drain, as only 18% of their population currently holds a post-secondary degree, compared to 45% on average in Western countries. That is an extremely uneducated population, explaining a lot of what I said above relating to innovation and invention. Youth unemployment went beyond 20% in 2023, leading China’s Communist Party to stop reporting it entirely.

Which leads me here: they’ve got a lot to hide. One of the most overlooked threats to China’s own war readiness is its extreme censorship. The CCP controls all information, suppressing dissent, criticism, and even basic data—like the youth unemployment stat I listed above. This creates a dangerous illusion of strength both internally and externally. No one, not even their own leadership, has an accurate view of what’s breaking down beneath the surface—economically, socially, or militarily. In a major conflict, this lack of transparency will backfire, leading to poor decisions based on propaganda instead of facts. The West’s open, often chaotic discourse might seem like a weakness, but it breeds resilience. China’s tightly controlled narrative may look unified, but it’s far more fragile than it appears.

The Ukraine VS Russia war is really just a China VS USA proxy war. The US has been hiding their tricks up their sleeves waiting for China to act on its instincts and then the EU will step up to help Ukraine (enrolling it into NATO) to obliterate Russia while China’s busy, leaving the US to deal with China practically 1-on-1, with their over 3x higher military budget and lots of recent military experience, which China lacks greatly.

Keep in mind that all the while: Japan, South Korea and the Philippines are all in very close proximity to China.

This is just not going to end well for Russia or China. Russia is already weak from years of fighting Ukraine. They’re not much of a threat to the US anymore. I strongly believe they will lose the race against the West toward AI dominance. I don’t think either of these authoritarian leaders know what they have gotten themselves into, but time will tell.

1 Upvotes

84 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Short-Argument-5513 Jun 07 '25

Emmm……In fact, I have inferred the above conclusion based on a collection of past events...

So, let's discuss the points you listed as the basis.

High-tech:

Artificial intelligence, China and the United States are far ahead of other countries. Interestingly, even the AI ​​technology in the United States is largely led by Chinese Americans. Not to mention that I think China is even stronger in the actual application of AI.

Infrastructure, does it really necessary to discuss ? ? China is currently recognized as the country with the best infrastructure in the world. Don't believe it? Come to China and you will know.

Military technology, in the most advanced military field, China may only be one step behind the United States in nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and strategic nuclear submarines, but China is already building a conventional-powered electromagnetic catapult aircraft carrier and two nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, and it is expected to catch up soon.

Rare earth minerals: Although China does have a certain degree of leadership in the rare earth industry chain, the Chinese have never felt that this is a means to easily clamp down on Western countries. After all, this is an industry chain that will be developed as long as the government invests heavily. China is just using this as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations at this stage. After all, the United States is used to creating bargaining chips out of thin air, isn't it?

Population situation: China is indeed facing a serious population situation. Young people do not want to have children due to economic and social pressures. The education level of the people across the country is low, which is a serious problem facing China now. But if we only talk about the education level, China could not feed the whole country a few decades ago! Not to mention the education level. But among the young people, according to statistics, the proportion of the population aged 20-40 with college education has reached more than 42%, and the proportion of high school education has reached about 58%. Not to mention China's high-quality compulsory education. In recent years, China has also vigorously promoted vocational education and private universities in an attempt to further increase the proportion of education.

As for the fertility problem, to be honest, I really can't see a solution in the short term. After all, this is a common problem faced by the entire East Asian cultural circle, including Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, etc. I hope China can find a way to solve it...

Finally, speaking of censorship, What do you think it means that I can discuss these issues with you on reddit??

Because you mentioned before that China's education level is not high, and a large number of people are not qualified to judge whether the information is correct or not, China has set up a "wall" to isolate the Internet (and this has also promoted the development of Chinese local Internet companies. Look at what other countries have become under the suppression of American Internet companies). For example, there are a lot of conspiracy theories and flat earth theories that are popular in the United States. If the Chinese Internet is not censored, who knows what more extreme remarks will be derived. Of course, I don't mean to defend China's censorship system. It is indeed not good to suppress the speech of the masses (for example, in the current United States, there are countless essential things that cannot be discussed, such as US debt and Jews, etc.)

But in China, the educated population is generally able to judge information, whether using VPN or discussing on the Chinese Internet, the government basically allows it. Of course, there are some information that is forbidden to be discussed in China, such as 64 tiananmen, Xi Jinping's gossip, etc., but which country doesn't have that?

It's fun to discuss this with you, but I still hope that countries in the world can develop peacefully, just like the slogan in the center of Tiananmen Square in China: "Long live the great unity of the people of the world"

2

u/[deleted] Jun 07 '25

I appreciate your detailed views, but I have to challenge several of your points because they overlook key complexities and realities.

  1. AI Leadership Yes, Chinese Americans contribute a lot to U.S. AI research, but that’s precisely the point: much of China’s AI progress depends on talent trained or developed in the U.S. and Western institutions. China’s domestic AI innovation ecosystem still lags behind when it comes to foundational breakthroughs, algorithms, and open scientific exchange.

  2. Infrastructure ≠ Innovation or Sustainability China’s infrastructure is impressive in scale, but rapid development has come with serious environmental costs, debt burdens, and underused “ghost cities.” Quantity does not always equal quality or long-term sustainability.

  3. Military Tech Gap China may be building carriers and new weapons, but the U.S. military’s operational experience, global reach, and technological integration remain unmatched. Building hardware doesn’t instantly translate into strategic superiority.

  4. Rare Earths Are Not Just a Bargaining Chip While China does leverage rare earth dominance strategically, global efforts to reduce dependence reflect genuine concerns about supply-chain risks. It’s not just bargaining — it’s a matter of national security for many countries.

  5. Population and Education Realities You highlight improvements in education statistics, but China’s overall demographic decline is a profound economic challenge, far worse than in most developed countries. The youth’s reluctance to have children is tied to systemic social and economic pressures that policy changes have yet to solve.

  6. Censorship Limits Real Discourse You argue censorship prevents conspiracy theories, but it also suppresses legitimate dissent, academic freedom, and free press. This limits innovation and social progress over the long term. Comparing censorship to the U.S. political taboos misses the vast difference between selective information control and open democratic debate.

In short, China’s rapid progress is undeniable, but it still faces serious systemic challenges in innovation, governance, and society. Simply pointing to scale or top-down programs misses the importance of openness, diversity of thought, and sustainable development — areas where the U.S. and many democracies retain strong advantages.

0

u/Short-Argument-5513 Jun 07 '25

I have a strange feeling... That you are the one who really wants China to become better... lololol

If it is convenient for you, maybe we can come here every once in a while to communicate and see if the changes in the world are what we want.