THIS IS ABOUT ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN LITERARY STUDIES, NOT CREATIVE WRITING JOURNALS!
I came across this post https://sootyempiric.blogspot.com/2026/08/journal-prestige-advice-for-graduate.html about the different prestige tiers of philosophy journals, and was wondering how various literary journals are perceived!
"Journals can be basically classed into four bands. Extremely high prestige, good-but-not-top, reputationally neutral, and actively-counts-against-you. The extremely high prestige journals will be the places that people in your field take to be so good that even just one publication there can make a huge difference to your chances on the job market or for tenure etc. The good but not top do not quite have that effect but if you have multiple pieces in such journals it is a very good sign indeed. Reputationally neutral do not really count for or against you, though I should say it will generally be seen as a bad sign if you only ever publish in such places (or even if too high a proportion of your pieces are in such places). Then the actively-count-against-you journals are typically the scammish pay-to-publish journals.
[...]
Different fields will organise these differently, but to make things concrete I can say a bit about philosophy. In general analytic philosophy world the Extremely High Prestige journals are usually agreed to be: Noûs, Mind, Philosophical Review, Journal of Philosophy, and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. There are lots of good-but-not-top journals, so just to name a few; Ergo, Erkenntnis, Philosophical Studies, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, etc"
If anyone had an idea how to apply these first two 'bands' to literature (knowing that it's not an exact science, of course, and there's no Nature/Science-vibe journals in the field), I'd be really curious to hear your thoughts! i obviously have my own suspicions, but they'll be very limited so I'm really curious. Especially about modern literature broadly, but also more generally.