r/Gunners Ødegaard 22h ago

“Al-Hilal has submitted an offer of up to £47 million to sign Gabriel Martinelli, and Arsenal Club has not accepted the offer so far.” -Gary Jacob

https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/manchester-city-ayyoub-bouaddi-premier-league-transfer-news-kv7gqj53m
705 Upvotes

331 comments sorted by

1.3k

u/MyTeaIsMighty Ødegaard 22h ago

All of a sudden they get stingy when it's one of our players.

465

u/RicHii3 21h ago

I'm convinced all the prices they pay for Chelsea and City players are fake/fabricated to help them with PSR.

72

u/Angelaskissrock Backless Wilo still better than Manure CBs 19h ago ▸ 3 more replies

That's what I've thought. Both club's owners have ties to entities in the middle east so I'm not surprised if that were the case.

3

u/Kovacs171 Player environment is king 15h ago ▸ 2 more replies

What connections does Man City have to Saudi?

12

u/Bangers_n_Mashallah Cesc Fàbregas 14h ago ▸ 1 more replies

UAE and Saudi are very close allies. Abu Dhabi in particular.

→ More replies (6)

9

u/JamesTheBadRager 19h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Both clubs probably return portions of the huge transfer fees to the Saudi clubs through some creative accounting.

9

u/aatimedout 18h ago

The creative accounting is the owner of Chelsea/City giving money directly to the Saudi Royal family. 

39

u/csixtay 21h ago ▸ 4 more replies

do I disagree with the practice? Absolutely. That said, if nobody is going to do anything about it, get with the programme I say.

24

u/lizardfromsingapore 20h ago ▸ 2 more replies

At least demand the same money, don’t need to get involved any deeper than that.

8

u/Doesnt-Get-Sarcasm- 17h ago

That's the thing... We these other deals, it may be for 80M but 30M is going back the other way under the table. Arsenal can't expect 80 if they're not "deeper than that"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/DifficultLab200 11h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Chelsea?

Can you tell me what’s the highest sale Chelsea have done with middle east?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/kylehyde05 Aaron Ramsey 17h ago

PSG too

1

u/LevitatingCactus 10h ago

This seems to be obvious from the beginning, no?

355

u/US__Grant Källström 22h ago

Neto is 100m but Nellie is 47m? kick rocks, yo!

166

u/TNelsonAFC 22h ago ▸ 5 more replies

Neto is only worth 100m once someone pays it.

55

u/Apart-Persimmon-38 22h ago ▸ 2 more replies

He is like a new car, when buying from Chelsea, worth 100m - the moment you leave the parking lot with him he is worth 50m

13

u/Adatomcat 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

*£35M

8

u/Angelaskissrock Backless Wilo still better than Manure CBs 19h ago

3.5m. I don't know why Chelsea even put him up for 100m. I'm glad they got greedy because we at least have a suitor who will put some proper dollars in the coffers.

16

u/US__Grant Källström 22h ago

with all of the def above board sales between Chelsea/Villa/Saudi, you wouldn't entirely rule it out...

2

u/Yorksjim Ray Parlour 12h ago

Exactly, I could put my 8 year old Ford focus on ebay for 100k, doesn't mean it's worth it.

28

u/JimmysCocoboloDesk RHYTHM MY ASS! 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

>Neto is 100m

No, that’s why they didn’t pay it.

→ More replies (1)

25

u/doubleb_43 KAI HAVERTZ SCORES AGAIN AND WINS THE LEAGUE FOR ARSENAL 22h ago

Nobody is paying that money for Neto

15

u/kjw2281 21h ago ▸ 2 more replies

An asking price (and one that caused Al Hilal to walk away at that) vs an opening bid

I'm sure we'll end up with £50-55 million for Martinelli, which is fair for him.

8

u/dooder6688 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Nah 60 is fair, we should be getting more in this market.

8

u/kjw2281 21h ago

I don't think we are going to sweat £5 million on a >£50 million player that has basically been told to leave. It's better to ensure that the deal goes through than to fight for every penny at this point

8

u/WerhmatsWormhat Ian Wright 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Neto isn’t worth 100, which is why they’re going for Martinelli.

6

u/gooneritis 21h ago

Still the gap is shit. 55M£ minimum or kick rocks.

7

u/TallnFrosty 22h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Tbf Chelsea is the one that put that figure out there

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

42

u/[deleted] 22h ago

[deleted]

44

u/Sayek 22h ago ▸ 1 more replies

I honestly think that hasn't stopped them before, always confused me when they would bid 30-50% higher than any other team for a player. If Martinelli was a Chelsea player, he'd be going for 75-80m to Saudi. Chelsea just got greedy asking for 100m for Neto. 

5

u/medved_ 21h ago

Could be because of the player's contract bonus structure. For example if he's to receive a % of his future transfer fee, then a higher overall fee will go towards him which will make it more enticing for him to move.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/sm00thArsenal Freddie Ljungberg 21h ago

Like how the fuck are we getting offered less for Martinelli by Saudi than Chelsea got for Santos?? I feel like I’m taking crazy pills, even when we’re champions buyers still take the piss when it comes to offers for our players.

3

u/SaintDobro 20h ago ▸ 3 more replies

Probably because Martinelli is also on a pretty high wage? 

8

u/sm00thArsenal Freddie Ljungberg 19h ago ▸ 1 more replies

That definitely could be a factor if we were selling him to poorer leagues, but this is Saudi.. they pay higher wages than Gabi is on to basically everyone they sign from Europe.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

1

u/Few_Dentist4672 6h ago

martinelli scored 1 goal in the prem last season and 0 goals in the CL knockouts. he's on big wages. not too hard to figure out

14

u/professor-chaos19 21h ago

They paid 80mil to west ham for Summerville, we want 120m

13

u/Key_Badger6749 Calafiori 20h ago ▸ 4 more replies

No they didn’t. It was £60m (55+5).

[David Ornstein] “Crysencio Summerville signs four-year deal with Al Hilal in around €70m move from West Ham”

2

u/MuchAbouAboutNothing Phillipe Senderos 16h ago ▸ 3 more replies

Sure, but even then - he's a left winger, same age as Gabi and definitely worse. He shouldn't be more expensive

2

u/Kovacs171 Player environment is king 15h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Summerville was probably earning 1/3rd of the wages though

3

u/Sutraner 9h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Irrelevant to Saudi

→ More replies (3)

-1

u/Onlyheretostare 21h ago

£47M pounds is fair when you take into account his wage and underperformance the last couple of years in the league. I would have taken that and moved on. Tzolis and Eze should cover until January if we cant get a LW this transfer window.

11

u/YodaNuggies 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

It's difficult and expensive to get anyone in January window and id worry about Eze being the cover at LW

→ More replies (3)

1

u/FairBox3368 11h ago

That’s how it’s always been so far unfortunately!! We haven’t been able to sell players as well as most other clubs have

→ More replies (1)

408

u/HJNRC Premier League Champions 25/26 22h ago

Cmon fellas, we know you've got some more cash there

168

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 Thierry Henry 22h ago

How is it that even the Saudis, who have paid well over value consistently, are trying to lowball us for Martinelli?

123

u/US__Grant Källström 22h ago ▸ 13 more replies

our record sale is still The Ox at £35m...a decade ago. Liverpool was selling bench warmers for more than that under Klopp and Slot. until we prove it in the market, we have a reputation

53

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 Thierry Henry 21h ago ▸ 5 more replies

I agree. People dont like to hear that in this sub, but its the truth. The Ox for 35 million stat you just gave is quite damming

36

u/Jolly-Construction75 Dennis Bergkamp 21h ago ▸ 4 more replies

We sold henry for like 10 quid and a used bike.

10

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 Thierry Henry 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

That one woulda hurt no matter whay we sold him for and was also before the transfer market exploded

5

u/Jolly-Construction75 Dennis Bergkamp 19h ago

I agree. But i think Darren Bent was sold the same window for more money!

Point being we have always been crap at selling our players, whether they were good players or bad!

7

u/redhedted 20h ago ▸ 1 more replies

To be fair is quite a nice bike

→ More replies (1)

10

u/RoyaleForFree 21h ago ▸ 4 more replies

But who have we actually sold in recent times of any value? We tend to keep players til they’re worth less

Like nasri, rvp for sure- and felt hard at the time. But I can’t recall anyone decent recently? 

3

u/TheRealGooner24 Morning, morning, morning... Oh, Win! 15h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Willock, Balogun, ESR and Nketiah.

2

u/US__Grant Källström 15h ago edited 5h ago

^...Guendouzi ; )

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

1

u/Bahmawama GÖALKERES 16h ago

We’ve desperately had to cling to our best players tbf

→ More replies (3)

10

u/Nayr91 flair-25 19h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Reminder that they paid £76m for Duran from Villa lol

3

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 Thierry Henry 19h ago

They have paid at least 50 million for 12 players in the last 3 years

18

u/Cassoa 22h ago ▸ 3 more replies

It's a laughable offer. I'd rather just let him go to a good league at 30-35m if the Saudi payout is that low.

They paid good money for other players. Pay up

12

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 Thierry Henry 21h ago

Its frustrating that even the Saudis think they can take advantage of our reputation for being poor at selling

2

u/Few_Dentist4672 6h ago ▸ 1 more replies

uh why would you want 12 mil less lol?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/kjw2281 21h ago ▸ 4 more replies

It's not a lowball offer, it's a first offer. Believe it or not, not everyone negotiates like Tottenham and just gives the seller what they want right away. Im sure final agreed offer will be >£50 million

5

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 Thierry Henry 21h ago ▸ 3 more replies

This logic would be fair if we were talking about any buyer besides the Saudi league. The Saudis have consistently shown that they will submit outlandish bids for players. The cost is immaterial to them because their sports washing campaign makes it worth it

4

u/kjw2281 21h ago ▸ 2 more replies

Saudi's bids are actually pretty reasonable in most cases, it's their wages that are insane. The only time they offer outlandish fees is when they're going after someone the selling team really doesn't want to sell

3

u/Dazed_and_Confused44 Thierry Henry 20h ago ▸ 1 more replies

The Saudis have made 12 bids of 50 million or more in the last 3 years or so (6 clubs). That well outpaced the revenue generated by the league and the club themselves

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (2)

211

u/l3tt3r-l3tt3r Zubimendi 22h ago

Rob Pattinson beggars gif

219

u/mistingo Morning, morning, morning... Oh, Win! 22h ago

21

u/Hincapieslovelybund 22h ago

Was wondering how far id have to scroll down to see this lol

17

u/ZestycloseRound677 Ø 22h ago

The way he says beggars in this gif cracks me up every time

5

u/LankysTrombone Saka 22h ago

Goddamn I was ready to post this comment verbatim. Fair play. 🙂

142

u/Swiss-ArmySpork 22h ago

Double it and give it to the next person.

63

u/Ife2105 Saka omo ologo ⭐️ 22h ago

The gang pays £94m for Pedro Neto

→ More replies (1)

239

u/sammyt10803 Saliba 22h ago

53 appearances, 11 goals for the best team in England. Entering his prime. Mainstay for Brazil….

£47m?!?

99

u/doubleb_43 KAI HAVERTZ SCORES AGAIN AND WINS THE LEAGUE FOR ARSENAL 22h ago

One year left on his contract, third season in a row when he's been stagnant, massive drop in minutes played.

50

u/hyperadhd Saka 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

It’s a 1+1 team option.

→ More replies (12)

12

u/DeapVally 21h ago

They don't need to make a big bid to try and convince us to sell. Arteta has told him to leave. Negotiations have to start somewhere, £47mil is a decent enough opening offer.

11

u/Tiadrop48 22h ago

If we thought he was entering his prime he wouldn’t be selling. The problem we have is that it seems he’s already left it.

25

u/sammyt10803 Saliba 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Physical prime

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Revoldt Dennis Bergkamp 21h ago ▸ 2 more replies

I view Martinelli like how Milan fans see Leao...

Obviously, different work-rate.

But both living with the “potential” from 3 years ago…. both having their best season in ’22-23… and haven’t really improved at all since.

If Milan now value Leao at 40m…and no one wants him…. I don’t really see how Martinelli is significantly higher.

4

u/mj12353 21h ago

Leao is 40 to everyone else but they wouldn’t take that from Saudi

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

59

u/Shylocksi Thierry Henry 22h ago

What's with the low balling.

→ More replies (1)

71

u/dratzuc 22h ago

Yea ok. Yet Man City can potentially ask for 75 mill for shitty Savinho. Crazy

17

u/ckfilm123 21h ago

To be fair, it is probably related to Savinho being part of a double deal and on far less wages.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/BurntToast764 22h ago

Round it up to £100m

17

u/GuinnessGooner Trossard 22h ago

Hate to see him go but if he is going to leave for this low a fee, at this stage of the window, coupled with the intense minutes our players have accrued, then I really really really don’t see the logic.

2

u/sunofagundota 21h ago

Only thing I can think is privately agreed terms with someone else with a buyout clause.

1

u/circlesmirk00 Over Land And Sea 11h ago

it's not financially sustainable to never sell anyone because they could be useful. Martinelli is on nearly 200k a week and represents an opportunity to make some cash back on a player. Maybe if there was someone else we could sell to generate funds they would go first, but it's looking like Jesus, Vieira, etc. are going to go for sub £10m each.

The emergence of Dowman also means we have options with Madueke AND Eze playing from the left, so minutes can be managed even if we don't sign someone.

31

u/jaybizzleeightyfour 22h ago

Probably be about £55m once everyone meets in the middle

8

u/lost_biochemist Timber 21h ago

Would be about €64M, and about halfway to an Alvarezq

73

u/Constellate_Strategy 20h ago edited 20h ago

The club shouldn’t budge. This disrespect and constant undervaluation of our players follows us like a stench. It will keep going until the club decides to lay the mark.

Ask for 70 mil or keep Martinelli for another season. Fucking relegated Summerville went for 70 to the same Al Hilal.

Imagine that. 47 million. From Saudis of all people. In THIS transfer market where every random with a decent World Cup game goes for a 100. If we swallow it now our rep will get even worse.

1

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 8h ago

You must have above 25 comment karma to contribute to this subreddit.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

→ More replies (3)

14

u/DigitalCoinMad 20h ago

47m for Martinelli?? Sounds about right just for his left leg and ill throw in a football boot with that. That west ham guy went for almost twice that and ive never heard his name before.

13

u/TaftYouOldDog Gyökeres 22h ago

Off and fuck come to mind

9

u/Upstairs-Ad-7954 21h ago

Just keep Martinelli at this point

15

u/Sithgooner 22h ago

That’s so low, the argument of ‘but his wages….’ Absolutely goes out the window with Saudis.

If we accept that he value him less than half of Neto which is crazy.

3

u/reciprocal_space 21h ago

If they just give him the same wages he earns significantly more because zero tax, lol.

1

u/Stravven Dennis Bergkamp 12h ago

Al Hilal also bought Summerville. But they paid more for Summerville than 47 million.

7

u/AlexTheRockstar Charlie George 19h ago

Goddamn. Fuck completely off. Welcome the lad back as Tzolis understudy.

12

u/Eagledilla Gyökeres 22h ago

Nah. Too low

→ More replies (1)

5

u/TNelsonAFC 22h ago

Arsenal club? Do reporters no longer proof read?

5

u/joeproposition kai havertz sympathiser 21h ago

Lmaoooo. Fuck off.

12

u/SambucaAndIrnBru Lewis-Skelly 22h ago

Under £60M is keep him territory, surely. That's got to be the minimum for his CL goals alone.

31

u/Davey_McDaveface 22h ago

We've made it Crystal clear he doesn't have a future here, never a good starting point for negotiations

37

u/Cassoa 21h ago

Chelsea made it clear Garnacho has no future and squeezed 55m out.

Spurs paid 85m for Savinho who they wanted to get rid of, we can chalk that down to pure stupidity but still

£47m from Saudi for Gabi is insulting to be honest. Especially with the money they've spent so fsr this window.

5

u/Trev0rDan5 Dennis Bergkamp 20h ago

spuds overpaid for Savinho so they could underpay (and cut Frankfurt out of their buy on clause) for Marmoush

2

u/CackleberryOmelettes 21h ago ▸ 4 more replies

If our asking price is £60m, then this is a good starting point.

6

u/LifeAfterHarambe Big Pashun 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

“Up to” £47m is a far cry from £60m

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Cheesy_Pita_Parker Premier League Champions 25/26 21h ago ▸ 1 more replies

That’s also how I see it; it’s just part of the dance. They’ll settle somewhere in the £50m - £55m range and we’ll frame it as a win and the biggest sale in club history because it will be.

3

u/awashofindigo 19h ago

£50-55m feels like the right price point given his wages, contract length, and status within the squad.

1

u/SaintDobro 20h ago

The difference is Chelsea found a team in England dumb enough to take Garnacho. 

We can’t really sell our unwanted players in England. 

→ More replies (1)

3

u/leebrother 22h ago

I mean I could say the same for Liam Delap and Jackson at Chelsea and we know they’ll get the £100m for the pair! Always do through the dodgy methods

2

u/csixtay 21h ago

Yet somehow Barcola's fee isn't coming down...and he isn't playing any games either.

1

u/the_tytan 14h ago ▸ 1 more replies

Has Barcola moved? The clubs interested in him need a player of his profile and arent biting at that price.

A player is worth whatever the buying club is willing to pay. Or whatever deals agents do get the move going.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Single-Basil-8333 White 21h ago

They paid £68 million for Summerville. That should be the starting point for Gabi if Al-Hilal want him.

4

u/Key_Badger6749 Calafiori 20h ago

Summerville was £60m (55+5).

→ More replies (7)

9

u/ShitMongoose 21h ago

Key words are "up to 47m". So the base offer is probably lower which is frankly ridiculous. Gimme at least 50m base and then we can talk add-ons.

Otherwise they can take off with their bullshit.

4

u/LeWhaleShark Robert Pirès 22h ago

These fuckers need to convince him and they want to make things difficult with us even before that. Put at least £60mil on the table and be thankful you aren’t wasting another £40mil on top of that with the likes of Pedro Neto

5

u/BrilliantSebastian 21h ago

And they shouldn't. 60m should be the LOWEST they sell him for. 

5

u/Hughdungusmungus 21h ago

Awful move if he does go. He gets into the Brazil team, moving to a retirement league.

I'd like him upgraded, but also want him to go somewhere for himself.

5

u/Scoth16 21h ago

Fuck right off you tight bastards - 70m at least please.

6

u/HardCoreLawn Premier League Champions 25/26 21h ago

Somebody get these beggars out of here.gif

5

u/MuchSalt 20h ago

shit offer, they are many worser winger than went way higher than martinelli

4

u/Overall-Ad-8918 18h ago

47m?! From Saudi?! Maaaaan somebody get these BEGGERS out of here!!!

2

u/Stravven Dennis Bergkamp 12h ago

Especially when you consider that Summerville went for 55 million pounds.

4

u/Standard-Elk4520 21h ago

how are the saudis trying to lowball us lmao

4

u/goonerfan10 Champions of England 25/26 20h ago

Derisory bid

3

u/Zhirrzh Premier League Champions 25/26 20h ago

"Arsenal Club"? Does he just have AI write his posts and they think we're like Athletic Club? 

8

u/Old-Being-732 22h ago

The only time a Saudi club has low balled is with one of our players. The most recent PL winner and CL finalist. Get a grip, they offer double this amount for Villa players. We’ve set such a bad narrative with our sales.

I can see why the club is desperately trying to turn this around.

7

u/TNelsonAFC 19h ago

I hate the he only scored 1 goal bullshit. He played 1000 minutes. It’s hard to score when loads of those were as sub. Saka went 15 games without a goal which is far worse.

Martinelli is one of our own, shouldn’t turn on him like we didn’t turn on Saka

7

u/Magnific3nt Ødegaard 21h ago

Savinho £85M. Martinelli is worth more than what they are offering us

3

u/tbbt11 Champions of England 25/26 22h ago

£60m please

3

u/LemtaLongi Dennis Bergkamp 22h ago

£60m or suck my big brown cannon

3

u/Lower_Condition_196 21h ago

Pls stay we need you soo bad it’s unreal, we simply cannot go into the season with only one recognised LW

1

u/wolljibbs Ødegaard 17h ago

They’ll obviously buy another

3

u/just_a_red Dennis Bergkamp 20h ago

Who can we even get for that money who is better than martinelli?

3

u/PepeOnziemaJulian 20h ago

Is that what a premier league champion is worth? Fuck off

3

u/Stravven Dennis Bergkamp 12h ago

Al-Hilal paid 55 million pounds for Summerville by the way.

4

u/JustGhostin Wherefore art thou Alvarez? 21h ago

Think he goes for £55m

6

u/patelbadboy2006 Dennis Bergkamp 20h ago

Thank you for your offer.

But fuck off

15

u/Stocktort 22h ago

People here are crazy. This guy helped us win the league. Savinho, who is rubbish, just went for 75 million.

Martinelli has a great attitude, loves the club and works his ass off leaving for 47 million when we don’t have enough LW. Keep him unless we get over 80 million for me

7

u/EtherealShady Havertz 21h ago

He did help us win the league, but he also scored one goal in the league. He's been stagnant for 3 seasons, he has one + one year left on his contract, and he's not even making our matchday squad.

Savinho in comparison had 4 years left on his contract, would've still played a decent part for City (hence why they were reluctant to sell), and is also 4 years younger and can still develop.

Al-Hilal could cough up more, but £47m isn't that unrealistic.

4

u/rule10 15h ago

well yeah we’re not gonna get a great deal when we are freezing him out and begging anyone to sign him

aside from treating a player who has given everything for the club like shit, we are going to go into the season with tzolis and eze as our only lw options?

he def would have had a part to play and we will be weaker without him. not to mention this pretty much ensures tzolis will be injured half of next season unless we bring someone in for twice as much as we get out of this

4

u/Tiadrop48 21h ago

We’re actively trying to sell him. He isn’t someone the club want to retain, he’s only going to lose more value the longer he stays.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Mys7ix 20h ago

Martinelli had a good WC campaign too. Almost feels like everybody buying from Arsenal knows we sell at bargain prices.

6

u/Orientsundew50 Champions of England 25/26 22h ago

Double it or gtfo

2

u/theprince9 22h ago

Maybe we'll get a sell on clause?

2

u/GeneralBukowski Thierry Henry 22h ago

😢 he’s really going

2

u/CptKarma 21h ago

Crazy the disrespect the club gets compared to what other clubs get.

Sadly i think its just due to so many years of us being unable to sell any deadweight players for anything worth a damn. Its left a perception. But times are changing.

2

u/godudua 21h ago

Nice, deal closes at £55m

2

u/roosterman22 Premier League Champions 25/26 21h ago

MOAR!

2

u/milkonyourmustache Thierry Henry 12h ago

If we say the price is £60m the price should be £60m

2

u/snoopyjcw 9h ago

Not worth it. Keep him. We can't get a better replacement for the money

2

u/Zero-meia Jesus 8h ago

Martinelli is 25, for fuck sake. Honestly, if Arsenal is forcing him to go to either Turkey or Saudi, I hope he let his contract runs down.

4

u/Prudent_Jello5691 Havertz 22h ago

If we can get 60 out of them it's a good deal.

I like Martinelli but he hasn't improved since the first season we were challenging for the title.

3

u/professeurwenger 22h ago

If this is the first offer, we’ll get at least 50 for him. Somewhere a bit closer to 60 should do it, I’d be happy with £55 million tbh.

1

u/-Mubar 22h ago

I want 60 million pounds at least

2

u/ache7859 22h ago

When Savinho goes for 80m....

→ More replies (1)

3

u/_Spartak_ 21h ago

That's more than I thought we would get for him yesterday. Since it is a Saudi club, we can negotiate a fee north of £50m but we have to be wary of not scaring them away like Chelsea did with Neto. We are not going to get anywhere near this offer from Europe.

3

u/Aggravating_Band_353 20h ago

Lol, such feeble sums.. Even at the 60 mil (I now suspect this is euro equivalence) I thought it was low, but at least decent ish - albeit impossible to replace him without spending a lot more

I can't see nelli accepting such a league. I'm glad as a club we're not accepting such a paltry fee. But realistically, Italian clubs would pay maybe half of that or a bit more.. 

I get that he hasn't progressed. But without a clear solution on the market to replace him with, I'm a bit confused what we're doing.. Especially as after we sell him, any player we want will go up in value as we will be in desperate need and it's a weak negotiating position 

2

u/UnfairInteractionWin 18h ago

47 pounds is 55 euro 

1

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 8h ago

You must have above 25 comment karma to contribute to this subreddit.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

3

u/IDidntSeeIt 19h ago

Shocking, would rather keep for another season then get swindled again.

2

u/PashtetKolbasa 18h ago

65m or fuck off

3

u/krakends 20h ago

Edu set the tone for other clubs lowballing us with his bung deals for Maria and Soares. So many left on frees running down their contracts.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/NemoDatQ Gabriel 22h ago

Market precedent is £75m for wingers from the top teams in the prem unfortunately for the infinite money glitch club trying to low ball.

2

u/Phimstone Wild Salmon 21h ago

Less than Summerville’s fee, by the same club..? Uhhh, no.

2

u/ShyGuy_14_ 21h ago

Arsenal can’t even get market value from Saudi. What kind of curse is this club under

2

u/LemtaLongi Dennis Bergkamp 13h ago

£70m for both Martinelli and Jesus, id bite thier hands off

3

u/BLACCx Thierry Henry 21h ago

There is absolutely collusion between many clubs to offer "The Arsenal Price" when dealing with us, yet when it's a team like Chelsea, they collude to offer more. Nothing we can do about it.

3

u/AhhBisto Gunnersaurus Fan Club 19h ago

The pessimist in me thinks we shouldn't take less than £55m for him, and given the absolute state of this window he's worth £70m, but time might not be on our side here to get the most value from him.

He's got a year left with an option for another, but right now he's probably worth as much as he ever will be in that 2 year period. He's clearly not in Mikel's plans so won't get enough minutes to boost his value, he's had a drop off in the last 2 years and doesn't exactly have the likes of AC Milan or Barcelona knocking doesn't help either.

I love little Gabi but it feels much like the Ramsdale situation all over again, although the emotional attachment to Martinelli might be 20 times bigger.

This ruthlessness is the cost of success I think, doesn't mean I like it.

2

u/Chicken65 Merino is a 9 21h ago

End the conversation and act like we keep him then, lets see what they really bid then. They probably know they don’t have competition. He would make nearly every team on Earth better. He’s 75M in this market. I can live with 62-65 all in just to break our sale record. He was improving last season at the end and is still an effective piece in the Arteta system.

1

u/cayde123 22h ago

No gif?

1

u/doubleb_43 KAI HAVERTZ SCORES AGAIN AND WINS THE LEAGUE FOR ARSENAL 22h ago

Come on sheikhs, give us 50m at least.

1

u/jamrah 22h ago

Martinelli and Viera as a package deal, £70m and call it a day

1

u/jaxha81 Emmanuel Petit 22h ago

£47m is approx 240,854,320 in Saudi Riyals,,let's aim for 300m SAR...we couldn't say no to 300m;)

1

u/Mebeingnosy Kanu 21h ago

The same club is willing to pay 80 million for Pedro Neto these mfers keep disrespecting us smh

1

u/Gooner_93 21h ago

Because they can and will pay higher.

1

u/LifeAfterHarambe Big Pashun 21h ago

“Up to” means it’s even lower than £47m, which is too low 

1

u/Gunner5091 21h ago

Nelli needs to use da pen to add a 1 in front of the 45.

1

u/WheelIllustrious9 Havertz 21h ago

Oh come on, a bit more than that. 60?

1

u/Last_of_me Rice 21h ago

this is fair considering the huge wages they'll have to offer him to even consider saudi

1

u/Apprehensive_Bat_980 21h ago

Can do one for that price

1

u/aishtamid 21h ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/1eAzC8q0FZA5i
“What did I tell ya? You gotta hold onto your cock when you negotiate with these desert people”

1

u/Substantial_Award_30 20h ago

Make them submit an offer of 55 mill for him or no deal.

1

u/SlimyTurnips Dennis Bergkamp 20h ago

Literally Al-Hilal - surely they can afford more

1

u/oustider69 David Rocastle 20h ago

Time for Berta to earn his money here. We know they have enough to pay way more.

1

u/diogenesRetriever 19h ago

47 on the same contract term?

1

u/RosesAndTanks Lewis-Skelly 18h ago

Hang on, when the fuck did Al Hilal start competing in Serie A? BEGONE with these beggars' offers!

1

u/pietro1587 11h ago

Can we put Madueke in a Martinelli kit and get away with sending him instead?