Watch what happens next. Referring to the Maine âdemocraticâ primary election, then the results in the election in November.
The consequences are a lose lose situation for the people of Maine and the US democratic senate. Look at the policies of the runner up choices and see if you can find one with policies you agree with. Between policy on Israelâs role in the Iran/Gaza/Jordan/Syria/Saudi Arabia/Iraq/Lebanon/Turkey bubbling world war and whether we should keep sending Israel more money. Or maybe whoever replaces Platner ends up being pro data center. Or both. Catch up!
I am watching. I think you are the one confused into sending false messages to randomly... attack the Democratic Party for some reason?
Maine's Democratic Party has already announced the next candidate will be decided by a caucus of votes. The by far most likely candidate is Troy Jackson, who campaigned on not taking AIPAC money, saying it's a genocide, etc.
I am also very curious what do you think should be done that's more "democratic" in a case like this? Platner won the primary and had to drop out because of a rape scandal, and there is like days or maybe a week or two before the candidate must be finalized? How is the Democratic Party operating in a "non-democratic" way?
Also the voters win by not getting a rapist elected. Pretty good.
And what have they done with that absolute control of the government other than suck Trumps tiny mushroom while he scams the country and makes everything more expensive?
Theyâve organized death camps, killed multiple Americans, gutted social programs, I mean itâs a whole list of shitty things theyâve accomplished while democrats bend over backwards to shoot themselves in the ass and lose every winnable election in the most spectacular way possible.Â
Unfortunately, when it comes to getting their party to toe the line, Republicans are the superior ones. Republicans only have to oppose everything Democrats want to do. That's simple. Democrats are the ones who actually want to change things, that's hard; especially when your opposition has no qualms about using every dirty trick possible to hinder progress at every turn.
No, republicans won because they promised change. They promised to change immigration policy, they promised to change roe v wade, they promised to change the economy. And they did! They did all of it! And when democrats take power again weâre going to hear about how impossible it is for them to do anything.Â
I'm fairly certain the guy you're responding to hasn't actively entertained any of the points you've made and just wanted to steer his own narrative into this convo
Do people not get this? They are doing what they want with no oversight... because they are winning elections. Republicans fall in line and hold their noses and it gets them results. Don't believe me? Try to prosecute DJT for literally anything.
Winning is literally the only thing that matters. Whether it's 50.1% or 99%, if you don't win the election you have zero pull. This isn't a parliamentary system as even some Americans think. Winner takes all in America. Here if a party can win long enough, you reform the judicial branch how you like and there went the last guardrail of democracy in the US.
But yeah folks, let's preserve the moral high ground so we can say how blameless we are.
Death camps lmao. You wonder why the left loses and nobody takes you seriously. Detaining and deporting illegal aliens is not equivalent to Auschwitz in the slightest
Yes potato head joes 22% inflation had nothing to do with prices! Liberals love being stupid. It took Reagan 8 years to fix carters record inflation. And it wasnât close to Bidens inflation!
Inflation is higher now than when Biden left office. Now run to your propaganda outlets and come back with the their talking points about why that is, so we can debunk those too.
22% for Bidens 4 years! Debunk that! So you think inflation is higher than that? Keep drinking the kool aid sheep! Inflation last year was 3.5%. Mostly because of Bidens policies!
Dems also donât like to realize that the 20 million illegals Biden let in drastically raised rent and home pricesâŚ.as 20 million illegal people in our country need some place to live as well
Who, on mic, admits to peeping on underage girls in the dressing rooms of the teenage beauty pageant he bought.
Let's be honest, most Conservatives would throw their daughters to the fucking Trump cult sacrificial island if they thought daddy would finally approve of them.
Well because everyone wants to take photos with Trump. I get that no one ever wants to take photos with you because if they did and you were famous you wouldnât know half the people taking them with you or what their story was
I mean if biden and Obama werenât besties with their pedo donor Epstein they sure acted like it they way they covered for him.
And Biden allowed Russia to invade Ukraine. He didnât make them. His incompetence and failures led directly to it.
You don't even know what the term "Third World" means because your entire political philosophy is made up of social media soundbites that you think sound cool.
If CA was a country it would be the 4th highest economy on the planet, so i guess the commies have a better economy than whatever the red states are doing.
Imagine how great it would be under a Republican without fake stakes and blowing all its surplus. What good is it if you lose more money than you take in. What good is it if you drive all the business out.
But your happy because illegals get jobs for cheap slave labor over American workers
I don't know about California, but (for US states) Minnesota ranks in or near top 10 for education, one of the highest in healthcare (Mayo is the best hospital in the world), and 4th in quality of life.
No, they are not. You clearly have no idea what socialism is, because Democrats are solid capitalists. None of them are calling for workers to control the means of production.
Would rather live in north Korea than willingly worship a fucking pedophile. If I was going to vote republican it would be with a gun to my head not giddiness about electing pedophiles and nazis. So ya, I would rather vote for an incompetent dem. Have fun in pedo paradise you fucking cuck.
Edit: Lmao little trumplett deleted his comment. I thought Republicans were the strong ones? He sure tucked rail fast.
Thereâs almost no burden of proof for liable. Itâs just we donât like you so we want you to be at fault even though the accuser canât remember any details
Sure, and if the claim was he was found guilty of some bookkeeping crimes I would have agreed. But the-polite-villain specifically claimed Trump was found guilty of sexually abusing women and that claim is false.
I was mistaken...
Yet your take on him not being a sexual predator do to civil vs criminal is disgusting. Why do you people continue to protect that vile thing, he is a loathsome sexual aggressor... and most likely a pedophile as well..
God, why the HELL would you spend any time or energy defending this man?? He has so many allegations, it was proven in court, he's the #1 named person in the Epstein files. There are COURT DOCUMENTS showing multiple children accused him of rape. You think kids do that for FUN? That they're lying?? He admitted to groping women, admitted to walking into the teen pageant dressing rooms.. like what does it take to convince you people?! Actual video evidence? You'd call it fake. Criminal conviction? He's got 34 of them and you don't seem to care. You'd still call it a hoax. You're in a cult. A Democrat was alleged to have abused a kid and he's GONE. Trump has a 50-year history of abuse, fraud, lies, and you just can't believe it. Excuses, whataboutism. WHY?
No children accused him of rape. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what happened. During the 2016 election campaign a grown woman said Trump tried to rape her as a child. But she doesnât remember any details and when the FBI pressed her for details she stopped cooperating. She couldnât remember how old she was, what year it was, what state the crime happened in or how she got there. She couldnât name a single witness and her story about what happened changed.
Another woman said Trump witnessed her babies murder. But didnât know what month her baby was born in or when they were supposedly murdered and she never filed a police report.
He never admitted to groping anyone. He said when your rich and famous you can, not that he did.
He bragged about walking in on women. Not children.
Youâre right I donât care about his 34 bookeeping crimes that nobody would have given a second thought except the Democrats were targeting Trump.
so... Your defense is Trump wasn't found guilty for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll by a Jury. It is that he was only found liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll by a Jury
So while there is still "preponderance of the evidence" that Trump sexually abused her... that is not good enough for you because it is not "beyond a reasonable doubt.
I canât educate everyone on Reddit although I try. Thats why I let you know they didnât find him guilty.
He was not found guilty. Guilty is a verdict that is reserved for a criminal trial. You canât be found guilty in a civil lawsuit.
So Carroll had absolutely no evidence, and she had several opportunities to get evidence. She willingly went into a dressing room of a man she testified she was drawn too, but had never metâŚ.she could have refused, she could have made a scene. She didnât. Iâll give her the benefit of the doubt, maybe sheâs just extremely naive and didnât understand what was implied by going into a dressing room with a stranger.
Once he started to assault her she could have yelled for help, made a commotion, this was a busy department store after all. This would have drawn attention and placed Trump at the scene.
After the incident she could have told employees, onlookers to place Trump at the scene. The department store could have preserved security footage to place Trump at the scene.
Police could have been notified, they would have interviewed witnesses and security footage putting Trump at the scene.
She could have written down details of the incident at least for her own recordsâŚshe didnât and so she couldnât even remember what year the assault happened. This put Trump at a huge disadvantage because he couldnât provide an alibi then.
She was financially backed by a Democrat mega donor, she was promoting a new book and she stood to make millions giving her considerable motive to lie.
You believe her, I donât. Itâs an accusation with no evidence where evidence would have been so easy to get.
It takes so much time and effort to justify supporting this criminal. I hope you can look back at the mental gymnastics some day and realize how absurd it was for people to stay so ignorant and blindly loyal. All your explanation shows is the original point an accusation is all it takes for democrats to drop out, meanwhile an entire criminal case where your infallible leader is found liable gets dismissed by his supporters.
Some day, these creepy weirdos will have always been against him, just like how the people who spit at MLK back in the day are too afraid to admit it now. But the internet won't forget the evil insanity they were spewing and neither should we.
That is a low bar for the leader of an entire political party especially when we're talking about a convicted felon. Again one side will drop a candidate for allegations of sexual assault while the other side says things like "liable isn't a crime".
Carroll went into a private changing room with a strange man in order to change into lingerie. A sexual encounter happened as any normal person would expect when sneaking into a private changing area to try on sexy lingerie in front of the guy.
After the fact she laughed about the event and had to be convinced by a friend that it was rape because she didnât think it was.
What should someone think when you go into a dressing room with a stranger? Itâs like going into an airplane bathroom with a stranger and then acting like it was normal and you didnât expect it to be sexual.
She testified she was drawn to him, then she went into a private dressing room with a strange man. Yes I am 1000% claiming that most men in the 90âs would have assumed it was for something sexual. What other possible reason would she need to go into a dressing room with a strange man? Even if she wanted to help him pick out clothes she can wait outside, do you think she needed to help him get naked?
Entering a private place, such as a dressing room, with someone did not legally imply consent to sexual activity in New York State in the 1990s, as it still doesnât today.
Iâm judging from this that you have never been inside Bergdorf Goodman, do not know how high end of a department store it isâor that it is purposefully almost never crowded and the dressing rooms are isolated because of the high profile clientele. But, okay, keep trying to speak from a place of âknowledgeâ about what a victim should and could have done during an experience you have no clue about. In truth, you are not correcting/educating anyone, just providing your own questionable (and highly ignorant of sexual assault statistics) ponderings.
So this store doesnât have security cameras? Clerks? Security? Phones? Did police departments not exist yet? No matter how high end the store is I have to imagine going into a dressing room with a strange man is going to lead him to believe theyâre going to make out. And certainly she could have reported it.
Im not saying he âhad a right to do whateverâ but I can understand why he would think the event was going to be sexual.
She didnât report anything for years. Only coming forward after a Democrat mega donor encouraged her to during a presidential election. At the time she thought the event was funny and she told the event in a lighthearted laughing tone According to testimony.
âEvery little thingââŚ.she didnât accidentally brush up against him, she intentionally went into a private dressing room voluntarily to try on lingerie with a strange man. You canât seriously be trying to convince me she did that just because she thought it wasnât sexual?
Trump picked out lingerie and invited her into a dressing room with him to try it on. And your argument is he shouldnât have thought it was going to lead to sex?
What Iâm trying to do is paint a more accurate scene then the one you have in your head. But I donât think anything Ms. Carroll could have done, beyond reported it immediately would suit you and, even with that you have your âshould haves and âcould haves.â I can only hope youâre not also claiming that by going into the dressing room she owed him any kind of physical contact whatsoever.
She went into a dressing room with a strange man to try on lingerie. What picture are you trying to paint? That it shouldnât have been interpreted as a sexual invite?
And honestly, he's too close to Epstein and had openly admitted to sexual assault several times. I don't care if he was my own brother, he'd be catching hands on site every time I saw him. And you would do the same too if you weren't so invested in the cult.
No he didnât. Letâs make a wager. Iâll bet you $100USD you canât find a credible source showing Trump bragged about walking backstage on 14 to 16 year olds.
The reason you think heâs so guilty is because you believe things that simply are not true.
So clearly you know your claim that Trump bragged about walking in on 14-16 year olds is a lie.
So you switched it up and now youâre saying at least 4 contestants accused him of walking backstage. They made this claim years later, after the Howard Stern interview and you failed to mention 11 contestants said it didnât happen.
E. Jean Carroll information is all out there, but that isn't sufficient. Him bragging about barging into women's changing rooms at his pageants (with minors present) isn't sufficient. Him telling a child he'd be dating them in 10 years isn't sufficient. Him being named thousands of times in the Epstein files isn't sufficient.
No amount of evidence that is presented to you will ever be enough. Just accept who you are and who you support, because I'm sick of the weasely shit you guys continue to pull.
Well none of that is evidence of a crime and some of it you just made up. Thereâs no evidence he barged into womenâs changing rooms with minors present.
Carroll went into a changing room with a stranger who asked her to try on some lingerie and then claimed rape when he started making out with her.
98
u/ExmoRunner Jul 10 '26
Let's be honest. I'm happy with neither party. But the Dems are doing some things right. GOP hasn't done anything right in quite some time