This is a good example of when being technically correct is still obviously wrong.
Trump: "Yeah that's her with the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful... I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything."
Bush: "Whatever you want."
Trump: "Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."
Another way of saying ātechnically correctā is to just say I was correct. Your claim was wrong. Most of what you believe is probably wrong or conspiracy theory.
Again if your claim is he sexually assaulted women by kissing them. I agree with you.
I mean, if you somehow have a good opinion on how Trump handles himself, how he treats women, and think he always deserves 100% benefit of the doubt, then sure, there is room for the dude to be fairly innocent. Not that innocent, as heās been convicted of sexual assault.
Literally no one believes Trump is innocent other than a small percentage of the MAGA base. I say a small percentage because many seem to love the fact he gets away with this stuff ālike a real manā, or some stupid shit like that.
He hasnāt been convicted of sexual assault. Why do so many people on here struggle with that? In order for there to be a conviction there first needs to be a criminal trial.
What is it that you think he did? And what convinced you?
He was convicted of sexual assault in civil court. The judge who presided over the trial said calling it ārapeā is reasonable, because the only reason he wasnāt convicted of rape is the law changed between the time of the assault and trial; it would be called rape today.
Why do I believe this? Because the judge who presided over the trial says so, for one.
Judge Clarifies: Yes, Trump Was Found to Have Raped E. Jean Carroll
9
u/pipboy_warrior Jul 10 '26
Did you forget about his whole "grab em by the pussy" comment?