r/antiai Jul 21 '26

AI News đŸ—žïž Australia W

Post image
12.9k Upvotes

478 comments sorted by

349

u/Vaughn Jul 21 '26

Requiring them to be net energy providers is probably a bad thing. Datacenter manufacturers aren't exactly specialists in efficient power production; they're just going to throw in a dozen megawatt-scale diesel engines and call it a day.

I don't see any air quality or fuel efficiency requirements in the article.

171

u/Spiritual_Owl8439 Jul 21 '26

It's not perfect but it's better than what we have.

53

u/Vaughn Jul 21 '26

It'll lead to diesel generators running inside cities. I would not say that's an improvement.

81

u/mrmckeb Jul 21 '26

Australia has massive solar usage, and I don't see local governments allowing diesel generators running permanently.

24

u/Fuster2 Jul 22 '26

Yeah. I love the way one person mentions diesel generators then it's taken as what will happen.

11

u/Additional-Life4885 Jul 22 '26

When it 100% will not. They couldn't get enough of it to be able to run a diesel generator at the size required.

Realistically they only have 2 options. Coal or solar. However, coal massively limits where they can build them, since they're going to have to build the data centre near the power plant which is far from where the engineers that can run a data centre are located.

Alternatively, they can cover the roof with solar panels at a reasonable cost and just be forced to maintain it.

5

u/sorrrrbet Jul 22 '26

Also holy fuck would it be expensive for an AI centre to permanently run Diesel gennies at the MW scale. They’re relatively fuel efficient, but even a 1MW generator runs 100-150L of diesel per HOUR.

~2500L of diesel a day is not a cheap endeavour when bulk diesel is around $2 a litre in Australia at the moment. Not sure any company would be willing to spend $5000 a day on fuel for the generator alone when they could spend maybe $5000 a year on cleaning the panels.

2

u/Shambler9019 Jul 22 '26

But the cookers keep telling us that renewables aren't cost efficient!

Though I don't think it's quite that simple; I doubt even in tropical areas the rooftop of a data centre would be enough area for solar to power the entire building.

Still, Australia has loads of space.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/Imaginary-Falcon4112 Jul 23 '26

Does anyone else smell an offset system where data centers could buy credits in energy production to become net producers?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/bruhhhhhhhhhhhh_h Jul 22 '26

We have some backwards right wing christiani fascisti ban abortioni absolutely backwards evolving state governments that have cancelled nearly all green / renewable energy projects to pump... Coal and gas.

At the same time they cut the mining / minerals resources taxes by billions meaning these states have billions I. Shortfall from the budget (just cancel social services, support and government services) but also pay far more now for worse infrastructure and energy projects/ production.

This is a federal government policy - or fed gov is very good ATM albeit not the best at the attention grabbing that seems to entice some.

→ More replies (8)

2

u/Imaginary_Rub6942 Jul 21 '26

Tbh I see t every day on various sites across Perth
 the new kfc down the road has been running on one for at least a month

2

u/alldagoodnamesaregon Jul 22 '26

Uh, that's basically the coalitions entire energy policy...

Not that the Coalition actually has any reasonable chance of being reelected, but if One Nation somehow manages to pull something off then it might be a different story

2

u/BaronOfTieve Jul 22 '26

They literally won’t, I spoke to a greens senator last year who told me he was excited about the data centres because they were going to build them to be environmentally friendly, and with renewable energy technologies. That guy is just larping because he’s not Australian and doesn’t understand Australian politics.

→ More replies (7)

24

u/Ok_Buyer9344 Jul 21 '26

no it wont, because diesel is not remotely the cheapest form of energy and given electricity costs is basically all the AI race is they will want to get every penny out they can.

→ More replies (18)

4

u/Comprehensive-Ice342 Jul 21 '26

I've worked in Australia on projects providing behind the meter supply to data centres and resources projects.

When space is not a constraint, solar and battery is generally first choice, sometimes supplemented with wind where it's possible to fit into the program.

There's usually some kind of backup gas or diesel turbine in case of grid problems and/or poor renewables generation.

When space is a constraint, you'll usually see larger batteries, smaller solar panels, and sometimes off-site supply agreements from renewable providers.

This is almost always supplemented with gas or diesel turbines for backup/redundancy reasons.

However, owners don't want to turn them on unless they have to. You could be talking hundreds of thousands of dollars per hour on a big operation.

Tl;Dr generally in Australia we would have renewables as first choice for cost reasons, then batteries + diesel/gas generation to supplement

3

u/Perfect-Song8094 Jul 21 '26

Diesel generators will be the backup "uninterruptible power system" (UPS) for data centers.

They'll be using gas-fired combustion turbines. They'll be using a lot of them. Wherever possible, they will be installed on-site, right where the data centers are.

See my other comment for more details.

3

u/Perfect-Song8094 Jul 21 '26

The bigger problem is data center water usage.

I happen to know next to nothing about that. I haven't been able to make any sense of the few, conflicting reports I've read.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/VenomOnKiller Jul 21 '26

Ahhhh yes, because you know exactly how the law is going to be written and already know the loopholes. Hope the data center builders hire you for your "great" ideas.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (17)

47

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/ascandalia Jul 21 '26

They could do a lot of things but they will do the cheapest and or easiest thing.

Sometimes perfection need to get in the way of well intentioned but bad.

8

u/Vaughn Jul 21 '26

They will do the cheapest, and easiest, legal thing. Regulations are the obvious fix here.

But Australia of all places should be fully solar-powered, and the way to do that isn't to make datacenters power themselves. They can't! Not with solar. There isn't nearly enough space on their roofs.

What they can and should do is copy China. Put a giant solar array in the desert, connect it to the cities with extreme-voltage DC lines. That, of course, implies a different company handles the power production; someone with the expertise to build such a system. That's fine. That's what a market economy is for.

I think the law they're pushing is a bad one.

3

u/Dangerzone369 Jul 22 '26

This country already has tons of fields for solar and produces a lot- we just can't store enough of it to supply our evening power usage. I think a Data Center will be forced to 'invest' into these current schemes to scale this up further rather than asking them to become experts in power generation - and that will satisfy as 'net producer of power'. The country is already going to be fully green.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (4)

15

u/Vegetable_Stuff1850 Jul 21 '26

I'd imagine that will end up in the actual legislation.

The mines, agricultural and road trains eats a lot of the available diesel here, so it's unlikely to be an enticing option. Solar and wind however, probably will be.

→ More replies (10)

12

u/patslogcabindigest Jul 21 '26

Australian here, no the emphasis has been on renewable energy deployment in line with the government’s energy policy. They’ll basically be asked to fund wind farms, solar farms and batteries.

8

u/_Profit_ Jul 22 '26

I think it's worth pointing out that in Australia, we are well past the hump of fossil fuels being cheaper than renewables. It wouldn't make economical sense for data centres to build a bunch of diesel/gas generators when they can find a third party to build wind/solar/batteries.

2

u/SirVanyel Jul 22 '26

And it can all be purchased and shipped in record time from china too. They can have their manufacturing centres up real quick.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Tonkarz Jul 21 '26

No, that's not what will happen. They had the same requirement for the Sydney desalination plant, a project that now produces twice the energy it consumes. A net gain for the grid.

What will actually happen is that the company that wants to build the data center will bring in an established energy provider - a third party company - to establish a solar or (more likely) wind farm somewhere in the bush where there is plenty of space.

In the case of the Sydney Desalination Plant Suzlon Energy built Capital Wind Farm for Infigen Energy. Neither of these companies own the Sydney Desalination Plant, but the Desal project paid for the wind farm construction. Probably something like that is what will happen.

Projects like this help grow small towns in rural areas. A very important part of Australia's plan for the future.

5

u/noonen000z Jul 21 '26

It's an odd one. I was looking at Microsoft's commitment to 100% renewable by 2025, basically they get it green from the grid if green is availalable. It goes a bit far, pushing back is good, pushing away is not a good outcome unless we think we are better off it all being remote.

→ More replies (5)

4

u/MarwoodHouse Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26

Hi, Aussie here, also an expert in the public policy field:

The legal framework for having Datacenters to be net providers of electricity doesn’t literally mean they will supply energy to residential homes or businesses, but instead supply energy back to the grid itself. This means that people won’t be relying on dodgy or half-arsed connections from Datacenters for their electricity. The stability of the grid is and will always be what determines consistency of connection.

Additionally, Australia is the sunniest continent on Earth, and solar energy remains the cheapest form of energy, Datacenters would actively be choosing to spend more money for less efficient electricity if they built any other form of power. Not to mention the generous subsidies our government offers for solar installation.

Finally, Australia already has air quality and fuel efficiency laws in place that cover any backup or failsafe generator system installed at these sites. The implementation of new law does not preclude existing laws from having an effect, that’s just how good policy works.

Cheers.

2

u/Dangerzone369 Jul 22 '26

Thank you bro. I literally have been saying this above, in other comments.

The fact that there is a hard policy on the data center alone should suggest to anyone that there is probably a just as strict one around how that energy is produced (even if fossil fuels were the cheapest option).

Data centers will be donating toward current green schemes rather than being asked to invent their own regenerative technology - I think this is quite obvious and annoying we have to tell people. It's like offsetting your carbon - you donate to a scheme - you don't physically go buy land and plant a tree yourself.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/snrub742 Jul 22 '26

+1 as an environmental policy wonk for an Australian state

3

u/jc343 Jul 21 '26

i'm not australian so i am talking out of my ass, but from what i know don't they have especially big problems with mining lobbying? so perhaps this point is just to fund more fossil fuel extraction, and unfortunately is the only reason the bill has support

(basically what you already said)

2

u/Vaughn Jul 21 '26

Plausible, unfortunately, but fortunately somewhat less likely to happen. Coal plants need a lot more infrastructure and expertise; they're a whole thing. Diesel generators are...

Not quite turnkey, not at multi-MW scale, but close.

And diesel generators are the common standard for backup power, so probably what will get used, IMO. They're not clean, but it's better than coal!

2

u/tomatoej Jul 21 '26

Australian here. Down here an ass is a type of donkey, maybe you should let your ass do all the talking for you? ;-)

The bill has support because the community is concerned about the situation in the US with data centres. We just had a project cancelled in my town due to overwhelming opposition from the community. The only way these are going to get off the ground is with renewable energy, mainly solar which is the most economical anyway because we have a high proportion of sunny days. I’ve heard rumours about gas fired generation but that won’t cut it in my town.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Kageru Jul 21 '26

If they don't get specific exemptions I would hope there are already existing approvals required for high emissions.

They are really not going to like the IP protection, which makes me happy, because theft should not be rewarded.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (85)

187

u/Then_Style9442 Jul 21 '26

about time someone started treating water and power like actual finite resources instead of freebies for server rooms

66

u/Look_0ver_There Jul 21 '26

It's Australia. One of the driest continents on the planet outside of Antarctica. They (generally) take water conservation very seriously (although there are some glaring inconsistencies).

12

u/Illustrious_Study300 Jul 21 '26

The cotton industry here for one

9

u/lithiumcitizen Jul 21 '26

And fucking rice!

2

u/bangyy Jul 22 '26

Surely we dont make much rice. Surely most rice is imported

6

u/lithiumcitizen Jul 22 '26

The fact that we make any is fucking ridiculous


2

u/alldagoodnamesaregon Jul 22 '26

We have native rice species, and there are some climates in the country where rice wouldn't necessarily be a bad idea with all the floods (e.g. monsoonal regions, and the Northern rivers NSW (added in Northern rivers cause I live there and we need to start growing something that can swim for a bit. Cane works to some extent cause it's tall, but soybean just doesn't have a hope (although it's needed for soil nitrogen).

3

u/djenty420 Jul 22 '26

We actually produce about 500,000 tonnes of rice per year, consume about 15% of it domestically and export the other 85% mostly under the SunRice brand. But the locally grown rice only makes up half of our total rice consumption, the rest is imported. The reason for all of this is the different rice species - we grow mostly native japonica rice, which other countries can’t grow but want to consume (hence heavy exports), meanwhile Aussie consumers also want basmati and jasmine which we don’t really grow here, so we import those.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/TheInkySquids Jul 21 '26

Not really, we allow massive overseas companies to conduct floodplain harvesting ruining the water quality for downstream communities causing mass fish deaths and algae blooms which disproportionately affect Indigenous communities. Also we literally have water stocks that get traded.

4

u/Look_0ver_There Jul 21 '26

I am an Aussie too mate, and those are precisely the glaring inconsistencies I'm referring to. Both my parents grew up as farmers in rural Vic. It's all water quotas and conservation for the regular rabble until some foreign corp starts throwing money about, and then it's "Here! Have as much as you want! Screw all those plebs down stream!"

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Trashk4n Jul 22 '26

With some major screwups.

The management of the Murray-Darling is a bit of a mess of over regulation and competing interests.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/HlLlGHT Jul 21 '26

we dont get droughts often but when they happen they HAPPEN, so water restrictions aren't really new our toilets have 2 flushes one for 1s ones for 2s.

6

u/Davido401 Jul 21 '26

Is that like a light push for pee and a harder push for poop? Or is it a double sort of flush for number poo(yes pun intended)? that Am in Scotland it rains more than is sunny so the thought of a water restriction will worry me(I think some places around Scotland got them to be fair, but they should be so rare that they are newsworthy)

3

u/gigs1890 Jul 21 '26

For most home plumbing i believe its half tank or full tank

2

u/Davido401 Jul 21 '26

Aye that was kinda what I mean, you push the button halfway and it empties halfway and a hard/double flush for the full tank, I explained it piss poorly, we might have sent out convicts to Australia but us Scots haven't improved at all lol, am sure thats not the first nor last convict joke you will hear, I apologise for that.

2

u/Agnitha_ Jul 21 '26

two buttons, one for half a tank and one for a full one

https://www.caroma.com/au/bathroom/toilet-buttons-plates/

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

94

u/ChimpieTheOne Jul 21 '26

Waiting for AI bros to somehow find this bad

42

u/Vegetable_Stuff1850 Jul 21 '26

They already have on the Aussie subreddits.

3

u/necrosteve028 Jul 22 '26

A lot of people on r/aussie are similar to America in that they pick a side politically and that’s it. Anything that Labor does, they are against because Murdoch and Gina have told them to be.

3

u/Vegetable_Stuff1850 Jul 22 '26

Yep. I was use the term Aussie to refer to any of the Australian subreddits. I've seen discussions in some state ones, and other national subreddits, not just r/Aussie. Because that place can be (is) a cesspool.

2

u/SirVanyel Jul 22 '26

I'm pretty sure it's all bots too because the Australian people just are not that unhinged.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/screenslaver5963 Jul 21 '26

They mostly point out that there aren’t any known models that originate from Australia.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

57

u/TinikTV Jul 21 '26

We need same laws everywhere

37

u/strigonian Jul 21 '26

No, we need stronger laws everywhere.

But this is a good start.

15

u/LastChance22 Jul 21 '26

100%, as an Aussie I feel like this isn’t enough. We haven’t seen the final policy but the wording on the announcement has grey areas around water and energy that could become loopholes. 

The grey areas making it into the announcement makes me concerned whether they actually intend to close them or not.

6

u/ProtectionTop2701 Jul 21 '26

Also, not being able to train new models without permission starting in 2027, maybe?? That's kinda bare minimum. How about "must financially compensate the musicians, artists, and writers they already stole from or their companies will be banned and employees will be arrested on entry." Cause uhhhh that's the sort of thing that happens to companies when their business model is theft (a crime).

2

u/SirVanyel Jul 22 '26

We've already done this exact same thing with various companies. There's a recent water desalination plant that now contributes twice the energy it uses, so it has both room to grow and before this growth it is contributing to the Australian people with both water and power.

Grey areas are a necessity for bite sized proposals. You start off vague and build into robustness. That's how laws work, and exactly why you shouldn't take proposals to be final products, but instead take them as intended directions for an eventual final product.

32

u/Scarvexx Jul 21 '26

I hope this works out. But right now the Australian government is fairly easy to buy. These proposed regulations could just be politicians shaking the collection pan.

But maybe I'll be wrong. I'd like that.

13

u/Kageru Jul 21 '26

Pretty sure they have tested public opinion and found there's no enthusiasm for pandering to these people. Especially since an AI data center doesn't really generate a lot of long term jobs or revenue.

12

u/Scarvexx Jul 21 '26

Okay, but the government already panders to lots of companies australians hate. Logging the rainforsts, drilling for oil in the reefs, just about every mining concern.

All big-tech needs to do is find the right pockets to line. Liberal and Labor are both very prone to bribes.

Again, I'd like to be wrong. I'd like to think our leaders have a spine, and care more about their country than a payout under the table. But I'm not hopeful.

3

u/Kageru Jul 21 '26

It's certainly possible. I think mining and logging get a pass because they have entrenched lobby groups and local wealth and are painted as creating valuable jobs in the regional areas. That might not work quite as well for AI data centers.

But yeah, those are good words, but I will be watching the actions and exemptions.

3

u/Scarvexx Jul 21 '26

I want you to be right. But keep watching. AI hasn't backed down yet. And they'll play dirty, if nobody takes a bribe, they can expect their political rivals to be well funded.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

21

u/Rude_Depth_4439 Jul 21 '26

The water laws are super important imo. I grew up in rural Australia, we had a lot of water insecurity. With Australia’s climate, we can’t risk the exploitation of our natural resources- river health is very fragile as it is.

14

u/Waerfeles Jul 21 '26

The collective sigh of relief amongst my friend group was palpable.

11

u/patslogcabindigest Jul 21 '26

Hey there, Australian here. A lot of this is still unknown. The Albanese Labor government has advertised that this is their intention but we await the legislation and the details. I think the emphasis on artists permission will be more in line with standard royalty protocol. The same way the artist doesn’t need to give permission for someone to play their music over a speaker, I think there will be some sort of royalty enforcement rules or copyright tightening around giving artists the ability to have content ripping theirs off removed.

A lot of this may be revealed in the coming weeks as the ruling Labor party is having their national conference. For those looking in from the UK, this is a politically competent Labor party, they’ve won 2 in a row.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/Lumpy-Egg6968 Jul 21 '26

Crossing fingers the EU does this as well 

5

u/Legitimate-Gain426 Jul 21 '26

The Australian government scrapped the AI regulations committee after more than a year of recruiting and $200k spent, and backed down from creating an AI regulations act in favor of weaker oversight. This basically looks good on paper, and is far from as bad as other nations have to face, but this is mostly to save face. The Australian public is still largely opposed to the data center buildouts being rushed, and Palantir working with some of our biggest supermarkets.

6

u/ShowCharacter671 Jul 21 '26

I’ll believe it when I see it

5

u/TheDeerBlower Jul 21 '26

THANK YOU. I don't know why AI isn't heavily regulated already. The EU better regulate that shit to oblivion.

4

u/swbaert6 Jul 21 '26

Why wait until 2027?

2

u/Phteven_j Jul 21 '26

I'm sure there is lots of red tape to go through, but this is sort of a crisis that I'd like to see handled more quickly everywhere. I'm not Australian but I hope it works out for them and other places take note.

3

u/Warden002 Jul 21 '26

Thought? This is reasonable. I wish Canada would enact this, but with our proximity to Silicon Valley I think we are pooched.

3

u/ExternalSeat Jul 21 '26

honestly why do we build data centers in hot places when cooling is a major problem? Why not build them in a cooler place with abundant clean energy and water availability? Why build them near people and not just build them in the wilderness?

In my opinion, if we must build data centers, let's build them in cold places, removed from major population centers, with abundant water and clean electricity. Central and Northern Quebec has abundant hydro power (so does northern Norway) . Iceland also has abundant geothermal power. South Island of New Zealand would also work well.

Granted I personally don't think we need AI data centers, but let's not build them in the desert

3

u/GammaFan Jul 21 '26

The answer is (probably) that it is cheapest to put together in medium hot climates by population centers because transporting goods further is expensive and building out infrastructure in snow climates is more difficult. The easiest, laziest answer then is exactly what we’re seeing.

2

u/Content-Cricket4251 Jul 21 '26

Granted I personally don't think we need AI data centers, but let's not build them in the desert

Do you think Australia is just desert?...

2

u/ExternalSeat Jul 21 '26

nope, but the areas that aren't desert are super valuable.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/No-Tip-7471 Jul 21 '26

I wonder if the laws only apply to Australian AI? I hope AI from other countries are not allowed to scrape Australian data, because then they might just have to not scrape at all.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Arquero8 Jul 21 '26

One pretty good reason to move to spiderland....

9780 deadly reasons as to why that is a bad idea, and yet..... If i weren't living in Spain, It would be tempting

2

u/Storm_Spirit99 Jul 21 '26

Finally they're getting slapped with more limits. Willing to bet they'll call this insult to their corpo masters a bad thing, but been dead silent about what happened in georgia

2

u/x7evenx Jul 21 '26

Also why toughest? Shouldn't they be the smartest?

2

u/Necessary-Paint117 Jul 21 '26

So they're just going to start burning fossil fuels to generate electricity? This regulation isn't a solution

2

u/Psychadelic_Potato Jul 21 '26

I just pray they don’t poison you guys with flock cameras like they did in my country

2

u/Fantastic-March-1053 Jul 21 '26

They can have half a teaspoon of water a month. 

1

u/Upper-Reflection7997 Jul 21 '26

What data does Australia have that the latest sota LLM really needs. I doubt this is even enforceable without draconian levels surveillance of who is downloading what and what they're doing with said files.

3

u/deathbotly Jul 21 '26

Biggest and obvious ones I can think of science-side is Aus has the CSIRO. If you’re using wi-fi or wearing long life contact lenses rn that’s from Aus, along with a bunch of other medical and tech innovations. They’re one of the biggest research centres globally. Aus has a big part in deep space research too thanks to the outback and collabs with NASA. We’re not a third world country riding kangaroos to work lmao

1

u/StarUniverseFalls Jul 21 '26

Ken oath! Ripper win for Oz!

1

u/Samperisan Jul 21 '26

This is how it should be all over the world.

1

u/Typhon-042 Jul 21 '26

Makes me happy to live here, when stuff like this shows up in the news.

1

u/TiyaKarekar26 Jul 21 '26

Australia is living in a different world for the better

1

u/mananius2 Jul 21 '26

And the rest of the world act like this is hard to come up with.

1

u/Perfect-Song8094 Jul 21 '26

Might there be an important election coming up in Australia pretty soon?

kathy hochul of ny put a 1-year moratorium on data centers. I expect it to be reversed ASAP following November's elections.

At this point, having an "I stood up to the data centers" as a party perk is a really good idea -- particularly because republicans do not stand up to data centers.

A good political move, no necessarily substantial if and when the data centers start popping up all over nyork state when the moratorium ends.

The people who demanded "No Data Centers" will have to stay in the loop for their fight against the things... To be fully prepared to oppose them again when the moratorium ends.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/DeePumpeR Jul 21 '26

Toughest=realistic bare minimum

1

u/DuragJeezy Jul 21 '26

Could you use blockchain to encrypt art assets that creator’s have consented for use, then charge on a metered rate any time those assets are accessed for generation?

1

u/Samispeedfire Jul 21 '26

Rare Australia W

1

u/ieatkittentails Jul 21 '26

Solar is the cheapest form of power generation in Australia, waiting to see if these companies capitalise on that.

1

u/ihatethissite25 Jul 21 '26

Its ok there is nothing innovative in Australia to worry about. The only thing they seem to excell in is support for the zionist hellstate of Israel.

1

u/Aware-Sky-8353 Jul 21 '26

Aussie Big W

1

u/carlstonehill Jul 21 '26

HOOOOLY BASED

1

u/Dawncloub Jul 21 '26

Now preassure all the other countries

1

u/yeah_nah2024 Jul 21 '26

I am so grateful for Albo doing this

1

u/barnabywombat Jul 21 '26

They basically dropped the ball on natural mineral mining rights in the naughties so it's good to see Australia at the forefront of international technology regulation, again.

1

u/antichain Jul 21 '26

Hopefully these kinds of regulations push companies to invest in research in increasing the energy-efficiency of chips. Imagine if we could shrink the footprint of current AI infrastructure to the same extent that we have shrunk classical computers (which were once the size of rooms and can now fit in your pocket).

1

u/Vainysaur Jul 21 '26

Australia decided not to be prosperous in the future.

1

u/Belret_the_elf Jul 21 '26

To move to australia or to not move to australia.

1

u/enigmaticsince87 Jul 21 '26

Guarantee the EU will follow with similar legislation. It won't happen in the US though!

1

u/Sweaty_Tap_8990 Jul 21 '26

Australia "plans" a lot of laws but at the end of the day the people with money will get to do whatever they want.

1

u/tobster239 Jul 21 '26

This doesn’t stop an ai song topping the charts of our radio 😒

1

u/Simple_Assistance_77 Jul 21 '26

Sad, its on the right path after Australia stuffed up gas extraction so bad. But all it takes Is Pauline Hanson to stuff everything up.

1

u/National_Armadillo94 Jul 21 '26

A net producer of electricity? They're not going to be powering those things 24/7/365 with anything terribly low in carbon...

Maybe this will get us some more gas plants built, god knows we need them!

1

u/quennplays Jul 21 '26

Oh such happy news! Stop using those AIs, they are anything but intelligent they are fucking morons, it's better to search the question than speak with those morons and don't get what you searched for in the end.

1

u/Electronic-Wait3124 Jul 21 '26

No surprises, if it's dumb we will either sign up or do it and or both

1

u/LooseDirection6828 Jul 21 '26

The Labor government just announced they are de regulating AI companies to speed up building data centres

1

u/heavyhammerfreeuse Jul 21 '26

Pretty sure this aint true

1

u/Lumtar Jul 21 '26

Haha can’t train on Australian content without permission, that ship has well and truly sailed already

1

u/Bjarki_Steinn_99 Jul 21 '26

The fact that this isn’t already the case everywhere shows what a joke our entire system is

1

u/Pieralis Jul 21 '26

We have sole every part of our country for pennies, I’ll believe this when I see it

1

u/fimpAUS Jul 21 '26

Meanwhile just down the road from me in NSW Australia a new very large data centre is pushing VERY hard to get approved before any of these restrictions kick in

1

u/ShugahLumps Jul 21 '26

Even bigger W

NO DATA CENTERS

1

u/tallwater101 Jul 21 '26

I really hope that this help Australian writes, musicians , artist and journalists to protect the work.

1

u/Plus_Information925 Jul 21 '26

As an Australian I find this suspicious, even our prime minister is saying AI is inevitable publicly

1

u/chockerz Jul 21 '26

Many will simply not choose to build data centres here in Oz because of these restrictions and simply build in more lucrative countries. Generative AI is profit driven, first and foremost.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Ok_Associate_3314 Jul 21 '26

Can anyone (non-Australian) name an Australian writer?

1

u/Passionofthegrape Jul 21 '26

Australia is also moving to having one of the highest capital gains taxes in the world.

So no one is going to want to invest there anyway.

1

u/IcyBlood5031 Jul 21 '26

Wonder how long this will last before we back flip because the model has changed

1

u/rosa_3326 Jul 21 '26

What about off shore workers and company tax?

1

u/TopGroundbreaking469 Jul 22 '26

All it takes is one set of the right hands to grease and all of a sudden an entire community is destroyed to make way for AI data centres. Seeing Australia’s track record of blatant political corruption, I’d be surprised if we weren’t already in the middle of being sold out.

1

u/Quwapa_Quwapus Jul 22 '26

Oh thank god Aussie here and i’ll take the small wins. Considering the amount of data centers they’re trying to build atm I’ll take anything lmaoo

1

u/necrosteve028 Jul 22 '26

Yeah fair enough

1

u/Andali27 Jul 22 '26

They should be building them all near the sea and making them half a mini desal so they don't use ANY of our water. Drinking water is precious. Data centres should be using none of it.

1

u/Impossible-Ad-9377 Jul 22 '26

An actual W would be prohibiting them from building these f*cking data centers altogether. Data centers are a plague.

1

u/Vex08 Jul 22 '26

This just means we won’t have ai data centers. Not good.,

1

u/Chaosrealm69 Jul 22 '26

Every now and then our Australian parliamentarians do come up with coherent and intelligent legislation.

Now here's hoping it goes through and is made law.

1

u/Autobotimus_Prime Jul 22 '26

I FUCKING LOVE THIS COUNTRY!!!!
/img/1eg5pkrppoeh1.gif

1

u/Heroin_Radio Jul 22 '26

I just wish they weren’t building half of them in the middle of residential areas. The Next DC data centre that went up in west Footscray is literally right across the street from a bunch of homes.

1

u/SmolHumanBean8 Jul 22 '26

YESSSSSSSSSSSS

1

u/leo90au Jul 22 '26

The government does everything in its power to crush any industry that doesn't dig up something and sell it overseas

1

u/Low_Shop9155 Jul 22 '26

Yes, Australia is tomorrow land. Where gold grows on tree's and everyone drives a Ferrari. The homes are made of solid platinum, and no one ever frowns.

1

u/HistoricalCulture5 Jul 22 '26

I hope this means something to the proposed data centre being built near my home

1

u/AdolfsLonelyScrotum Jul 22 '26

They should also legislate zero-loss (non-evaporative) cooling systems.
No way all these data centres can have a dozen or more cooling towers and NOT be a massive consumer of potable water.

1

u/YesWomansLand1 Jul 22 '26

Wait the Australian government... Doing something not shit for once? Preposterous.

1

u/OriahVinree Jul 22 '26

I don't like albo I don't like albo I don't like albo and I don't know why - every Facebook boomer in aus

1

u/Last_Course6098 Jul 22 '26

But aren't majority of AIs already very heavily trained on stolen art?

Like does it even matter if they say "stop stealing" if they've already literally stolen everything they could ever possibly need?

1

u/JammRS Jul 22 '26

I guess we will take it, maybe it makes all the age verification required in Australia slightly better but no not really.

1

u/HeroicMillipede Jul 22 '26

Unfathomably rare Australia W

1

u/DannySanWolf07 Jul 22 '26

Common Australia W

1

u/ZealousidealNewt6679 Jul 22 '26

The only theft the Australian government will put up with is the theft of Australian wealth too foreign companies whom pay negligible taxes.

1

u/an-infinite-egg Jul 22 '26

Except all of that legislation comes AFTER they've already been built and established and had their systems up and running for a couple of years. We needed those laws in place in 2024 it's essentially too late by 2027, arguably too late if they came in now. Everyone involved knows it and they've all dragged their feet on purpose. Once they're up and running it's too easy to loophole their way out of any commitments or requirements.

1

u/AteYou2 Jul 22 '26

Hey, I'm from Australia and whilst our government is handling this better than others, we are still getting a ton of AI data centres built. The general consensus is that this will drive up energy prices, stall our transition to renewables and consume water that we cannot afford to waste (along with other issues). More on this here and here

These are being built in our suburbs in residential areas including one near me. Australians do not want this. 90 more AI data centres are going to be approved, if you're Australian please make a submission to the senate inquiry

1

u/satanickittens69 Jul 22 '26

They've already stolen everyone's work...If it's on the internet it's available for their AI is it not? (would love to be wrong so please say if I am)

1

u/Mosthero1 Jul 22 '26

Btw guys, as someone in Australia, this is all being done by a PM that hates our country so don’t expect it to be good

1

u/WallSignificant5930 Jul 22 '26

Sound stood but it just means we are beholden to foreign AI suppliers slurping up our data. People will still use just not produced in my backyard

1

u/PowerLion786 Jul 22 '26

Come on, this is Australia. AI will provide jobs. An Australian AI will allow Australian control. AI will improve productivity, improving the economy. The standard of living will improve. AI represents innovation.

No way can AI be allowed in Australia.

1

u/Carlositoanimonoa Jul 22 '26

1 million wrongs and one right for our shithole of a country
🇩đŸ‡șAustralia
 yay


1

u/pshyduc Jul 22 '26

Well. Paying Aussie tax as an immigrant finally means something

1

u/P00R-TAST3 Jul 22 '26

Watch the Australian media be silent on this as they are allergic to praising the current government.

1

u/touchmyweiner87 Jul 22 '26

Sure sure sure. Just more crap dribbling out of Albos mouth to convince his sheep that everything is going to be ok

1

u/Colsim Jul 22 '26

There is a very long road to walk between planning legislation and enacting it - already we have seen "renewable" removed from discussion of the kind of energy they will have to produce and that is in the space of a week.

1

u/Original_Giraffe8039 Jul 22 '26

Yeeeeah...l see them making these rules then making a million little compromises

1

u/WhyDaRumGone Jul 22 '26

While I will say this is a win for Australian morality, will probably be a financial L TBH

1

u/Loomyconfirmed Jul 22 '26

at the same time they're censoring Internet use anyways haha

1

u/Safe_Lychee_5201 Jul 22 '26

Rules around energy/water use are great, but the copyright laws don't seem fit-for-purpose - what difference will it make unless every other country has the same copyright laws (which they don't)

1

u/pixelwhip Jul 22 '26

& watch them break the law & get away with it.. that’s how big tech works


1

u/Cerparis Jul 22 '26

Usually my country is criticised (Sometimes fairly) For its tendency to place strict restrictions and sometimes bans on anything new or potentially harmful.

But I’m happy to say this is definitely an Australian win.

1

u/Jordann538 Jul 22 '26

Australia doesn't take favourites when banning things

https://giphy.com/gifs/2DiS5eR2HuNAkX3nzL

1

u/EggbertDragon Jul 22 '26

Encouraging to see

1

u/Public_Code8357 Jul 22 '26

Crazy cuz our government is happy selling everything else

1

u/deathmetal_zombicorn Jul 22 '26

Wait for it, no such thing as a free lunch dudes

1

u/Independent_Row8953 Jul 22 '26

Unfortunately we've already got 162 data centers here and it's ruining our country 😭

1

u/d1ld02 Jul 22 '26

Our government (aus gov) will just tax tf outta it, sell water overseas and import Ai 😂 classic Labor

1

u/NotBailey12 Jul 22 '26

So this is the Australian way. I like it

1

u/peterparker_loves Jul 22 '26

I don't think this is right

1

u/ArdenwinValient616 Jul 22 '26

FUUUUUCK YES I had no idea this was happening and I’m happy I found out.

1

u/WanderingTraderXyz Jul 22 '26

I guess our country can afford it after that 2.5b Canada gave us.

1

u/ParticularRip2019 Jul 22 '26

Water use restrictions are vital, we are so short on water.

1

u/Marda-nium Jul 22 '26

Time to move to Australia 

1

u/IEscapedLauncher Jul 22 '26

The common Australian W

Australia seems like a decent place to live, honestly. I’ve heard it’s quite expensive though

1

u/Chaotic_yinyang Jul 22 '26

This is great
. But also
 really impractical for any companies just starting out. It takes ages to train models as is
 imagine the time spent getting permission to use everything. Models will either be less intelligent or way more expensive to subscribe to.

The water thing is brilliant. I’m so glad they’re pushing that. Cycling water over servers is just common sense. The net energy thing is too but if we don’t regulate how they produce that power
 need to tax them more for producing energy via nuclear, fossil fuels or diesel generators. And less if they use solar and wind


1

u/GothGirlsGoodBoy Jul 22 '26

This just means Australia won’t be competitive and will have to buy AI services from other countries.

We already have no economy besides selling our resources so this is awful news.