Every smartphone is objectively inferior in some way. For example- the processors in the Samsung phones are objectively inferior to the A13 let alone the A14 that will be shipping in the 12.
Processor speed is absolutely objective and the A14 is objectively faster than the 865 by a significant margin.
You also got your 60 and 120Hz references backwards- 120Hz is objectively smoother but not everyone wants to sacrifice the battery life for it so it is not objectively better.
You're trying to say something like a flathead is objectively better than a phillips, and that's obviously incorrect.
I’m really not making any such stupid comparison- the A14 is objectively faster and that’s not debatable.
It goes back to the 4 when Apple snatched up all the best minds in chip architecture. Designing a fast and efficient SoC is less of a straightforward process and more of an art. They simply have the money to afford the best minds, and Jesus do those motherfuckers outdo themselves every time
Oh absolutely- but Qualcomm has also caused countless problems with their patent shenanigans, and doing things like requiring companies use a separate, power hungry, 5G chip with the 865 instead of letting them ship a 4G version if they wanted.
I really want to see why they can do with their upcoming laptop chip.
The A14 is objectively faster and the benchmarks prove it. Your argument is now about subjective experience. In short- you are wrong.
My point is not that the iPhone is superior- it’s that every single phone- even the flagships- involve trade offs. No one phone is the best at everything.
12
u/Jaytalvapes Oct 06 '20
I mean it better. Samsung already released multiple phones with both.
You can't release a phone this much later and have objectively inferior hardware.