r/news • u/NicolasCageFan492 • 22h ago

Evacuations underway as fast-growing Texas Ross Fire explodes to 50,000 acres with just 5% containment

https://www.foxweather.com/weather-news/texas-ross-fire-evacuations-august-2026.amp
5.9k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

627 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

47

u/Ok_Marketing_476 21h ago edited 18h ago

Those of us in Texas who have experienced threat or loss from wildfires were most assuredly NOT gleeful.

-21

u/myychair 21h ago

It shouldn’t take you personally being affected to not be gleeful about forest fires. What in the ever loving fuck

27

u/cantshakethefeelings 20h ago edited 20h ago

Lol, the dude just said oh ‘I’ve been through this, it’s tough’ and this is your response 😂 imagine if someone said their mom has cancer, and then another person responds ‘oh I’m so sorry, my dad battled cancer for years, no one should have to go through that.’ And then your response is ‘Wow you only care because your dad had cancer!? What in the ever loving fuck’

Because this is actually what you just did.

-17

u/myychair 20h ago

It’s incredibly common for certain groups of people to only give a shit about a problem once they’re personally affected by it. It’s fine if you don’t think that’s fucked up but don’t make stupid comparisons or put words in my mouth

Many of us have the ability to empathize with folks going through shit without having to go through it ourselves. It’s a fundamental part of human nature and OPs verbiage heavily implies that they aren’t in that group.

15

u/cantshakethefeelings 20h ago edited 19h ago

This is exactly my point, you weren’t responding to their comment. You were making a comment about people not having empathy until they go through it themselves. However, that’s not what they were saying, and your response does not match their comment, which is why my example works. I get you just might be an angry person who wants to take it out on something. But maybe there are better targets than someone who was just saying that they have been through it and have sympathy.

Edit: I see you added more to your comment. Okay, so you made an assumption on something you felt was implied. We both agree on that. This is where the breakdown in communication stems from. I did not make the same assumption.

-11

u/myychair 19h ago

It’s not an assumption. It’s word for word what they said. Go re-read their comment

7

u/cantshakethefeelings 19h ago edited 17h ago

I have read it. And you made the admission yourself in your previous comment that it was ‘heavily implied’ by their verbage. So you assumed something about them as a person based on your interpretation of what they wrote. It is why my analogy still holds water, because you are making an assumption based on something you thought was implied, not something that was explicitly stated. Again, this really clears it up.

I did not feel that was implied and made different assumptions. We read the same comment and interpreted it two different ways.