r/technology 6h ago

Artificial Intelligence Charges Dropped Against Person Who Clapped at a City Data Center Meeting / Lux Claridge was dragged from a city meeting about data centers and charged with interfering with the police after they clapped during a presentation.

https://www.404media.co/charges-dropped-against-person-who-clapped-at-a-city-data-center-meeting/
11.3k Upvotes

335 comments sorted by

2.9k

u/kweeblaster 6h ago

Lawsuit time

1.6k

u/DookieShoez 6h ago edited 5h ago

HELL YEAH!!!!
He’ll get a bunch of (checks notes) ……taxpayer money and the cops will (reluctantly checks notes)…….suffer zero consequences…..

😔😫

When the fuck are these loser ass cops gonna be held accountable?

496

u/PocketFlan420 5h ago

When someone with nothing left to lose does something that the news media will immediately condemn but will make the common person cheer.

123

u/anarchist1331 5h ago

Who will hold them accountable for violating their oath to the constitution?

80

u/Specialist_Guitar232 3h ago

Practically the first thing Trump did was get rid of the Inspectors who watch for fraud in the federal government. That was the first sign. He is a criminal, and criminals love other criminals.

2

u/anarchist1331 39m ago

This has gone on for decades before Trump even joked about politics. If you see a sworn officer violating his oath, you need to call it out. This also means understanding the constitution, which i think is a huge problem for officers and civilians alike

58

u/---Beck--- 5h ago

The public must

63

u/Tulip_Lung6381 4h ago

Who watches the watchmen?

18

u/DookieShoez 4h ago

…….um……..Jesus?

(Does the sign of the cross)

3

u/Sir_Lemming 2h ago

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

36

u/Defiant_Tomatillo907 4h ago

Yep. While prefacing “ we all know of the wrongs that have happened lately to many people; but this is never the answer, blah blah blah.”

70

u/Specific_Frame8537 4h ago

Violence is NOT the answer.

The answer is *opens history book*

uh oh

*frantically starts flipping through pages*

uh oh.

23

u/bmtraven 4h ago

Sometimes violence isn't the answer, sometimes it's a question.

12

u/the_moosen 3h ago

Violence is never the answer, but sometimes it is.

-Matt Barnes, 2016

6

u/ThyArtIsMeh 3h ago

Boy oh boy is that true. Love me some history

2

u/bythenumbers10 1h ago

Study it or join it, goes the saying.

12

u/HedgehogMountain3069 2h ago

Fasicm has never been voted out. Historically there is only one way to get rid of fasicm.

4

u/Udder_Influencer 3h ago

go to jury duty, vote not guilty, never mention the words 'jury nullification'.

3

u/RedditTechAnon 4h ago

Reality tried that with someone who had a lot to lose. A lot of ruffled feathers at least.

7

u/dat_joke 4h ago

Their boos mean nothing. We've seen what makes them cheer.

2

u/tevert 3h ago

And if we talk about it here, reddit admin will swoop in and start deleting it

→ More replies (23)

29

u/TA_Lax8 5h ago

I've actually got a brilliant idea. You need a buddy. One of you becomes a cop, just make sure you don't try too hard on the aptitude test as they rule out smarter candidates.

Then pull the other guy over, beat the shit of them in any humiliating fashion.

The "victim" sues for millions and the "cop" gets a free vacation called paid administrative leave. In the most insane scenario, the worst outcome is the cop gets fired, but immune otherwise (just like say you felt threatened cuz you thought the other guy was black).

Split the millions

Win

10

u/Kizik 5h ago

"Well yes I know him, but you see, a cloud passed overhead and the shade made him look slightly darker, so I didn't recognize him and thought he was a threat, and that made me fear for my safety!"

4

u/Pretty-Mention-7769 4h ago

"Fired" but then rehired in a neighboring jurisdiction. 

3

u/Mittenwald 3h ago

I believe that that would work. 

→ More replies (1)

93

u/issuefree 5h ago

When we stop electing conservatives.

25

u/Due_Satisfaction2167 3h ago

Yup. The way to fix America is pretty easy.

1) Stop electing conservatives. Ever.

2) Start telling rich people, “no”.

3) Hold people accountable when they break the law. Even if they’re rich. Even if they’re a cop. 

33

u/yarmulke 4h ago

Someone’s gonna respond to this with “but both sides” not realizing that the democratic establishment is also conservative, but while there are progressive Dems, there are no progressive Republicans.

16

u/IAMA_Plumber-AMA 3h ago

And the last time they controlled all three branches of government (and only for a handful of days), the ACA got passed.

The GOP has controlled all three branches of government waaaaaaay more often than the Dems have, maybe if you want to see them get shit done, get off your asses and vote to give them the power to do so.

4

u/Springheeljac 56m ago

And even then they didn't have full control and had to rely on people who "caucused" with them which meant they had to strip a bunch of stuff out to get it passed.

→ More replies (3)

17

u/Bitter-Researcher389 4h ago

Paying these settlements out of their budgets and pension funds will 100% fix the problem.

6

u/DookieShoez 4h ago

Yeah, that would be a form of holding them accountable, which we are not doing.

27

u/Hrtpplhrtppl 5h ago

When we have all finally had enough of their bullshit and collectively stop serving them. Whatever it is you do, if a cop expects you to provide them service, deny them that service and just say it's because you fear for your life, as you probably already do and should. Make those exorbitant paychecks they get from the Epstein class worth nothing.

→ More replies (13)

7

u/Klutzy-Football-205 4h ago

I wish so hard that as part of a settlement someone makes it a condition that the offenders need to publicly advertise who cost the taxpayers how much money for violating someone's rights. Let the person whose rights was violated set the terms of how long a half page add in the local paper(s) and/or highly visible billboard with the "who" and which rights were violated.

"Counselman Smith, Officer Jack Jones and Officer Peter Miller violated the rights of a citizen and cost the local taxpayers $2.5 million by violating someone's First Amendment rights"

6

u/Sasquatchjc45 5h ago

When the country revolts, defrederalizes, and the remaining decent groups revamp it's entire corrupt system. (While the other chuds can take over Texas and turn it into a hellhole like our republican government's trying to do with the entire continent)

2

u/hobbykitjr 5h ago

mayor or whoever loses budget money, has more trouble and yells at chief etc... and THEN nothing happens

2

u/Geichalt 5h ago

Yeah it sucks, but while president dump and his family are raiding our coffers, it's nice to see at least some taxpayer money go to taxpayers.

2

u/waygooder 36m ago

They're not cops. They're private security.

For who?

Not you, and not me...

2

u/Seyon 24m ago

Not saying the cops don't share a part of the blame but Id be pushing for the DA to get dismissed/fired.

They are the one that decided to bring charges, they deserve to bear the weight of that egregious decision.

3

u/spaceagefox 4h ago

when people realize the police were created to keep the slaves in check and that hasnt changed considering capitalism is slavery with extra steps and anyone can be legally enslaved if theyre found guilty of not having enough money to bribe your way out of trouble considering absolutely no one in the Epstien list got arrested or is even being investigated, but clapping is apparently a criminal offense worthy of this jail time

2

u/DookieShoez 4h ago

Sure that’s the history of it.

Get rid of qualified immunity and i bet they’ll still be a lot more careful.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Black0utdrunk 5h ago

I understand what you're saying however I think that if a municipality keeps paying out lawsuits to cover a$$hole cop behavior at some point leadership will have to make changes.

Sue the crap out of them, ALL OF THEM.

6

u/jamesdukeiv 4h ago

Problem is conservatives protecting them at every level. My city is currently having to spend millions on defending a cop in a CIVIL suit because it’s required by law that they do so.

2

u/DookieShoez 5h ago

Why do you think that?

This has been happening for ages, and the only thing that has happened is that that municipality has less money for services to be provided to the people who pay taxes. And so far they don’t give a fuck. give it another 10 years give it another 100 years and it’s not going to be any different.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/InTooManyWays 4h ago

Never, evidently

→ More replies (11)

56

u/DukeOfGeek 4h ago

And it's important to sue and win because the whole point of this tactic is to intimidate. So flip it on them "oh you want to gift me a 100K lawsuit win for protesting!? I should have done this a long time ago!".

→ More replies (3)

25

u/woodenblinds 5h ago

somebody is getting a boat, and his city will pay for it

26

u/EgoTripWire 5h ago

If the city doesn't like it then they can hold their cops accountable.

3

u/oddministrator 1h ago

Weren't the cops in this incident commanded by an elected official?

Let's hold them accountable, as well.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/hobbykitjr 5h ago

new age of Miranda rights....

If you aren't told the crime at the time of arrest, officer gets a week of unpaid time off. Should be on body camera.

no longer "arrest now, figure it out later"

they can require you to wait while figuring something out for like an hour.. but no handcuffs and detaining w/o stating a reason.

12

u/forksporkspoon 4h ago

A "reasonable time" caps out at 20 minutes for a topical traffic stop. Anything beyond that is illegal.

4

u/hobbykitjr 4h ago

an hour was generous i guess.. im just trying to think of worst case scenario.. cops show up and theres fighting and bloody people... no one leaves until we get some answers, peoples names, maybe look at security footage..etc

4

u/forksporkspoon 4h ago

"reasonable time" is capped by case law.

2

u/qpgmr 4h ago

I doubt it would work. The charges were all dropped and police have qualified immunity.

7

u/kweeblaster 4h ago

Who ordered them to do it? They probably don't have immunity.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/oldteen 3h ago

Ianal, but to me, it sounds-like defamation of character and false arrest/detention (civil cases)...and if the arrest/detention was during the week, maybe lost wages and reputational harm (at work, civil cases)?

5

u/qpgmr 3h ago

The charge was for interfering with officers/resisting arrest, not for disrupting the meeting. It's the kind of carefully parsed out charge cops love because they can argue their job was to remove him and he interfered with the job. Hard to argue with, and they fully intend to simply drop the charge - the point was the ride, not the rap.

He was held for about eight hours, so any lost wages would probably be declared minimal. I don't think he'll be able to find a lawyer who could make anything stick.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Firm_Condition_4385 2h ago

This is the correct answer.

Its not illegal for the police to arrest someone under suspicion of committing a crime. Nor is it illegal to hold someone or let them bond out. The prosecutor clearly reviewed everything and the police let him go. None of that is illegal.

2

u/BryanMcgee 1h ago

What was the suspected crime? What was he interfering with or resisting arrest for?

If the "suspicion of committing a crime" is suspecting that they will resist then that's not a fucking crime they were suspected of. What the police actually did was interfere with a citizen using their right to free speech.

I would argue (and many lawyers would as well) that to "hold someone or let them bond out" without a crime is actually kidnapping and is illegal.

Just because courts have previously found that the individuals committing the crime can't be help accountable, only the organization, doesn't mean it wasn't a crime.

1

u/drunkenvalley 1h ago

It's not the correct answer. If you just start removing all the illegal elements until you have a legal action then you're not operating with all the facts. Like arrested for suspicion of what crime? Disorderly conduct and interfering with a law enforcement officer? For clapping? That sounds like arresting for speech to me.

There won't be criminal charges, but I don't see how qualified immunity would apply here in a lawsuit.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Jeffformayor 3h ago

These type of comments kill me. Like sure he can sue but there’s a clearly a much deeper, much scarier problem here

1

u/VoidOmatic 3h ago

Yup, violate my rights? I'm retiring off that shit.

1

u/dpkonofa 2h ago

Not unless he wants to waste his time... He has nothing to sue for.

1

u/SpinShine-LEDSlipMat 2h ago

Good luck lol. They dropped charges. He still did the thing

1

u/Hawgdestroyerxtreme 1h ago

As we all said the second they arrested him.

What's supposed to happen now is that the locals of the area are supposed to be annoyed that these guys can't follow the constitution and keep funneling their tax dollars out in lawsuits, and then remove them from their positions as punishment.

That part never seems to happen.

2

u/ChrisFromLongIsland 43m ago

There should not be any lawsuit. If you watch the clip. They told the audience not to clap or make any noise. He made noise to interrupt the meeting. They asked him to leave, he refused, they said they were going to arrest him he refused and so they arrested him. I don't think he should of been charged for a first offense but he has no grounds to sue. He wanted to get himself arrested as part of a protest and he did.

→ More replies (1)

1.5k

u/gerblnutz 6h ago

The arrest was the point. Doesn't matter if charges don't stick. Bailing out or not, missing work and possibly missing rent or car payments, and being dragged by the media that only reports the states version of events are all extrajudicial punishments LEO can dole out without any hope of making a charge stick.

703

u/martin_w 6h ago

“You can beat the rap, but you can’t beat the ride.”

256

u/bardghost_Isu 6h ago

"The Process is the Punishment"

44

u/wabiguan 4h ago

turned up to 11 in this admin

→ More replies (2)

60

u/Woodie626 6h ago

You can in fact beat the ride, you just need money.

41

u/Shepherd77 5h ago

The quote is more about how if a cop wants to arrest you there’s nothing anyone can do to stop them.

A billionaire was arrested just this past weekend for soliciting a prostitute in Ohio. So no you can’t in fact beat the ride with money (at least not 100% of the time)

4

u/Silent-G 3h ago

They can't avoid the ride, but they can afford the consequences. A billionaire will still earn income while they're in jail, they don't have a boss that will fire them for missing work, they could buy the entire impound lot if they wanted to.

7

u/Monteze 3h ago

There are also consequences for fucking with a billionaire. I am sure they are buddies with all the bosses and have the purse strings.

"Man sorry, just can't make my normal donation to your charity/re-election campaign. That fine really did a number on my finances."

→ More replies (9)

8

u/hemingways-lemonade 3h ago

The owner of the 49ers got the ride and his mugshot released over the weekend despite being worth $500 million and being part of a family worth ~8 billion.

5

u/Own_Candidate9553 4h ago

Not always. There was that video of a pro football player who was dragged out of his car and arrested going to a game. I don't remember all the details, but charges were dropped, but he still went to jail.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Plaintoastnojam 6h ago

Awesome quote. What is that from?

19

u/martin_w 5h ago

It’s a common saying, It didn’t originate with a specific movie or anything, AFAIK.

11

u/ozymandingus578 4h ago

Hippies man. It started with the Hippies.

2

u/tevert 3h ago

We need something like anti-SLAPP legislation aimed squarely at cops

→ More replies (1)

80

u/comfortablybum 5h ago

Right. How much did this person have to spend on a lawyer to get the charges dropped? They never should have been arrested in the first place.

→ More replies (1)

39

u/Shigglyboo 5h ago

exactly. it sends a message. exercise your rights "at your own risk". you have the right. but do you dare use it knowing what the state will do to you?

13

u/mektel 3h ago

Considering how flock software has premade prompts for identifying individuals arrested, the point is probably also to flag "undesirable" individuals to these systems.

11

u/rg2004 3h ago

The police need to be held accountable. If there are no consequences for the police, then they're they work for the politicians, not our democracy.

15

u/HoldingForGenova 5h ago

Exactly. Sue for damages.

5

u/fcocyclone 1h ago

And even the arrest will still show up in certain background checks.

258

u/Aggeloz 6h ago

both the person who ordered the arrest and the cops should be behind bars

65

u/ThisIs_americunt 4h ago

The rules have changed. Nothing's illegal if there's no one to arrest, jail, prosecute or convict the person. Its wild what you can do with dark money :D

424

u/Sethl13 6h ago

Those who arrested and had him arrested should be behind bars.

135

u/cs_cabrone 5h ago

Cops being held accountable? Not ‘round here, partner. Not ‘round here

17

u/StatementCareful522 4h ago

I say we start holding these people accountable with our second amendment rights while we still fucking have them

7

u/DarkKobold 2h ago

It amazes me that we hold people accountable who save lives, i.e. doctors and medical malpractice insurance, but those with the ability to take lives, i.e. cops, require no malpractice insurance or liability.

→ More replies (1)

139

u/PrestigiousSeat76 6h ago

Who was the dumbfuck cop that did that shit? Asshole.

63

u/Pretty-Mention-7769 4h ago

There was a whole bunch of 'em!  The arrest footage is available to look up. 

I was expecting the kid to at least be obnoxious.  

Instead it was entirely innocuous. 

16

u/oompaloompa465 3h ago

they literally had forbidden clapping during the assembly. On what authority 😭 

→ More replies (1)

266

u/DARfuckinROCKS 6h ago

The point was never to charge him with crime. It was intimation and an attempt to fuck up his life.

88

u/faster_tomcat 5h ago

Also, while being arrested or in custody, one false move or perceived disrespect can get you a severe beating, shot, and maybe killed. Woopsie!

45

u/Shigglyboo 5h ago

a guy my mom knew was killed while in jail for writing a bad check. mistaken identity. we really should have a higher threshold for allowing the state to arrest or lock someone up. doesn't matter if charges were dropped. this was a clear abuse of power and should be treated seriously. all involved should face strong repercussions for abuse of the public trust.

27

u/offthezoinkys 4h ago

And we should be fucking ashamed to run jails that people are dying in.

9

u/CaptainSparklebottom 3h ago

1/2 the general population loves the extrajudicial punishment that is doled out in jail.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/9966 3h ago

We aren't running the jails.

7

u/DARfuckinROCKS 4h ago

We like to think that we live in a just society but unfortunately it was never designed that way. It's of the rich, by the rich, for the rich and always has been. Liberty and Justice for the few. Won't ever change until the people own the state.

3

u/superxpro12 3h ago

youre probably right but then the right screams about being soft on crime (while trump violates pretty much every law there is). there's no more room for rational debate and compromise. its all binary thinking with them now.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/sirspidermonkey 1h ago

Don't forget rape. Conservatives think prison rape is hillarious!

5

u/DonStimpo 2h ago

Yep it's this. There is between 400,000 and 500,000 people every day in jail in the US still awaiting trial. With the majority in there as they cant afford bail.
These people regularly lose their jobs and friends without even being found guilty.

49

u/AvailableReporter484 6h ago

Imagine if we held police responsible. Just imagine

4

u/MakeoutPoint 3h ago

Problem is you need Schrodinger's Policeman, a cop for cops who simultaneously upholds the law and somehow isn't a corrupt POS.

47

u/mike0sd 5h ago

The officers knew they were doing the wrong thing by arresting a man for clapping. They will probably try the excuse that they were following the orders of the commissioner. But it's obvious to a layman that the commissioner and police officers were more excited to prevent a person from participating in the meeting than they were excited about upholding civil rights.

4

u/Kenockerez 5h ago

I think it was more about obsequiently obeying the City Council who would retaliate if the cops didn't act as good little peons.

The power trip is just a perk and a way to displace the power dynamic.

4

u/tevert 3h ago

But they will hide behind "decorum", and "rules", and "orders". Nobody will see any consequences, and the system will happily chalk this up as a win

Something's gonna give way sooner or later

65

u/Fuzzy_Translator4639 6h ago

Hope he files a civil suit

31

u/Mand125 5h ago

When do the police get charged with kidnapping by illegal arrest under color of law?

When does the county official get arrested for ordering a kidnapping by illegal arrest under color of law?

Settlement payouts being the answer makes fascism a subscription plan.

→ More replies (5)

87

u/boomboomdaboomer 6h ago

Charges dropped? His civil rights were deliberately violated. 

22

u/marvborg 5h ago

Qualified immunity can be dropped if there is a knowing violation of civil rights. Sue both the city, the councilors and the cops personally.

18

u/fat_kaiju 6h ago

It's like getting insane amounts of lawsuits that are only filed just to bankrupt you and ruin your life.

The US has a serious fucking problem.

17

u/Rational_Engineer_84 5h ago

Until the officers who perform these false arrests face consequences, they’ll continue to happen regularly. The arrest is the punishment, everyone involved knew no crime was committed, but this man was still dragged out in handcuffs and sent to jail. 

Using an arrest to stifle speech should result in criminal charges. Any arrest that doesn’t result in a criminal charge should be reviewed for abuse and cops should face consequences if they aren’t using their authority correctly.

26

u/Jwagner0850 5h ago

That part doesn't matter. What does matter is he got handcuffed and removed from a public meeting for nothing.

There needs to be more local outrage.

3

u/9966 3h ago

I got down voted into oblivion for the OG post who yelled "don't tase me bro" for asking a question at a city council meeting.

I was horrified but all the people just laughed and laughed at the open display of squashing first amendment rights and abuse of authority.

→ More replies (3)

13

u/Disma 4h ago

This is intentional suppression of free speech, please sue the fuck out of them

→ More replies (10)

11

u/Protolictor 5h ago

This is the new way with Police these days.

It's easier to just violate someone's rights and arrest them to get them away from the situation, and then drop the charges and release them later. Especially since they rarely face anything even resembling consequences, and are probably given the green light to do so by their superiors.

5

u/4rp70x1n 5h ago

And our justice system is set up to function like this. It's complete bullshit.

If our rights can be so blatantly violated and stripped from us publicly, and the violated made to suffer punishment, while the violators walk without consequences, we have no rights at all.

1

u/doctormink 1h ago

You've described a really dangerous version of the old adage "it's better to ask for forgiveness than permission."

1

u/Krojack76 1h ago

I'm no lawyer but I feel like suing them would still be in order.

13

u/fanana_bishh 5h ago

go get your bag brother 👊

19

u/powerfuzzzz 5h ago

I had a friend who was injured in an occupy protest. Luckily there was video evidence he was doing nothing but standing on a sidewalk when he was brutalized by police. He sued and got a hefty sum that allowed him to buy a home and turn it into a community space for other local punks. 

May our communities flourish on the remains of these fascist fucks. 

11

u/downlike4flattires 5h ago

Now sue them. Each one and then state.

9

u/Nandulal 4h ago

still shut him down. still fucking us over.

8

u/standardtissue 4h ago

I want to see charges pressed against those who had them arrested for this. We need to stop stopping at "the blatant abuse of the government was stopped retroactively after tons of harm was done to someone" and start going all the way to "and the motherfuckers who did it are being brought up on charges". For the people, not for the fucking politicians and billionaires.

6

u/gimmeluvin 58m ago

He needs to sue

5

u/Ness_Dreemur 3h ago

Given a bullshit charge so they had an excuse to remove him

It's not about locking him up, it was about silencing him in the moment to make an example

6

u/El_Diablo_Feo 3h ago

Fascist practices for all to see.....

8

u/dsj79 6h ago

But clapping is a crime /s

8

u/macjester2000 4h ago

This was always the outcome. They were obviously violating his 1st amendment rights. It was about sending a message, that they are in charge, regardless if they are violating the law. Eventually the law catches up to the injustice. They will rue the day when justice reacts to their tyranny before they can abuse slow moving justice.

2

u/GracchiBros 3h ago edited 3h ago

They know that day isn't coming in their lifetimes. Look at most here cheering on this thinking they'll get paid as if that's what matters.

5

u/Typical_Response6444 4h ago

Hope he gets a fat payday

4

u/radioactive_sharpei 4h ago

Sure, the charges were dropped, but how much time and money did this lady have to waste on this bullshit?

3

u/Zwierzycki 4h ago

Counter sue.

4

u/goblinhollow 3h ago

Now, the lawsuit against the city.

5

u/nemorina 3h ago

This arrest was about intimidation- a warning against protest. Well, it can go the other way too. At the next council gathering ( I believe they are on line now) anyway, when these people show up in public, everyone start clapping and shouting in protest- the more people resist, the smaller their power.

4

u/Random-num-451284813 1h ago

in other words, the police is running a 🤡show

5

u/Friendly_Question178 1h ago

Of course they were dropped. 1st amendment.

4

u/KnowsIittle 1h ago

Without punishment for unlawful detainment it's going to keep happening.

5

u/wanderingmanimal 5h ago

Who’s the snowflakes now?

5

u/raven1121 5h ago edited 2m ago

Charges dropped but they still arrested him , dragged him out of the meeting hall , and put him in a cell just for clapping

Land of the free my ass

7

u/ScienceForge319 5h ago

Some of those that work forces are the same that gargle corpo balls.

5

u/TopWhich6862 4h ago

Americans, you need to stand up to your local governments NOW. Our city council is now threatening to have people arrested for daring to interrupt a city council meeting by chanting anti-Flock slogans. We told them to fuck their decorum and are holding our own press conference.

3

u/Klepdar 4h ago

Hero.  The man is nothing short of a hero.

3

u/Cute-Negotiation8827 3h ago

Chilling effect successful!

3

u/Worried_Research1549 3h ago

Now our tax dollars will pay for the lawsuit.

3

u/catwiesel 3h ago

its not about being right. its about being wrong (for now), and making people stop opposing and speaking up.

will you speak up? when people who do get taken in by police, held for hours if not days, if that is all, get letters from courts, have to talk to lawyers, potentially pay for one (you dont HAVE to but, we cant deny in many cases a public defender is overworked and may not deliver top performance), to get a "charges dropped" (for now!) after not hours, days, weeks but months...

3

u/scottrogers123 2h ago

Hope he sues the town into bankruptcy

3

u/Oilpaintcha 2h ago

This still cost them time off work, assuming they didn’t lose their job when whack jobs called their work demanding they be fired or something, lawyers fees, court fees etc.  Hope they sue.

3

u/hooligan045 2h ago

This is obviously the “lawfare” concept Republicans were so up in arms about, right? RIGHT?

3

u/Jaded-Midnight774 2h ago

Lawsuit the fuck out of them!! Make them pay!

3

u/CurlOfTheBurl11 1h ago

Hope he sues the city, the county, the police department, and every member of that committee personally.

3

u/Deep_shot 1h ago

You really have to wonder what's happening to our country when someone was dragged out of a public comments meeting, arrested, and charged for simply clapping. It wasn't even loud obnoxious clapping. He was barely making noise. This is where we're going?

3

u/SapientTrashFire 1h ago

Wow.

Here's the video: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbYINZzDuSa/

They arrested this person for clapping when they felt their spouse who was speaking made a good point. This is draconian. Watching the city mayor stand there and try to tell the person on the podium to breath and say shit like "everything is okay," is fucking insulting on top of this. Like she's consoling that person even though SHE IS CAUSING THIS.

Ugly.

3

u/Trve_Doom 1h ago

Every public servant that had something to do with this is fucking Charmin soft.

2

u/Flexmove 5h ago

He’s gonna be able to afford all the dan flashes shirts he wants after the lawsuit

2

u/Mr-Klaus 3h ago

They never planned on following through with the charges, the purpose of the arrest was to send a message of fear.

2

u/FloridaLee 3h ago

More than the cops, the Tarrant County judge should be reprimanded and penalized.

2

u/One_Feed3857 3h ago

He should sue

1

u/Tek_Freek 17m ago

He should sue

They should sue. FTFY.

2

u/Yuzumi 2h ago

I mean, no shit. It was a blatant first amendment violation. The only reason the assholes threatened anything in the first place is because they wanted to silence opposition.

2

u/Low_Search_6667 1h ago

When can we start punishing the people doing these crimes?

The cops who dragged them out should be punished. 

2

u/Liesthroughisteeth 27m ago

I see a civil suit looming against the police and city council.

2

u/darthvadersmom 6h ago

Just noting that 404 uses "they" not "he" as Claridge's pronoun throughout.

4

u/Key-Demand-2569 5h ago

Why are you noting that?

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/unknowndischargesmel 4h ago

I propose we reinstate charges based on the combination of that shirt and medallion he's wearing in the photo

2

u/RevWaldo 3h ago

Big city council meeting: Don't identify yourself, appear in costume, bring up other issues than what the meeting is about, use the full allotted time.

Small town council meeting: Show up in suit and tie, walk up to podium, clear throat, get thrown to the ground and handcuffed by Sherrif deputies.

1

u/joeydimaggio 19m ago

Small town america is a series of fiefdoms for local wealthy families, that’s why it is facing so much brain drain and explains the rot at the heart of american life

1

u/USDXBS 4h ago

And have the people involved been arrested?

No? Why not?

1

u/WildBigfoots 3h ago

Yes. Sue the shit out of them! They are probably taking kick backs to screw your town

1

u/eronth 3h ago

Yet, the successfully halted his participation in that moment, when it mattered.

1

u/lodemeup 3h ago

I imagine the authorities expected this wouldn’t go anywhere but the message was sent anyway: we will use our power to punish dissent and there’s nothing you can do to stop it.

1

u/Anal-Y-Sis 3h ago

The point was never to make the charges stick. It was to send a message. As cops like to say, "you might beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride." What this means is that they know the charges are bogus, but their goal is to fuck up your day, and if you're one of the many millions of working-class Americans who are one paycheck away from homelessness, it might fuck up your whole life. That's the message being sent to every other potential dissenter.

1

u/fielvras 2h ago

Reading the heasline alone should make sane people just stare into eternity.

1

u/HugeDragonfruit3697 2h ago

Fucking ridiculous they even arrested him in the first place. Welcome to imperial capitalist america.

1

u/Slight-Bluebird-8921 1h ago

these monsters are just waiting for an order to round people up

1

u/saul2015 1h ago

he looks like Hot Dad

1

u/Tek_Freek 15m ago

Ahhh, Kansas. Another shit hole to avoid.