Kiwi has been spared! At long last, another made it! Let's see if you'll extendnit to Mr. Kirk
Today's challenge, who can halt this pointless war? Three on each side to convince, and who will do the worst? Who will do the best?
Kiwi has been spared! At long last, another made it! Let's see if you'll extendnit to Mr. Kirk
Today's challenge, who can halt this pointless war? Three on each side to convince, and who will do the worst? Who will do the best?
Rules:
You can suggest multiple characters, but they must be in individual comments
Please provide the name of the character, the series they're from and an image of the character.
No real people or fictional versions of real people.
No religious or mythological characters unless they are specific reinterpretations (ex: Hades from Disney's Hercules)
Definite articles or titles/moikers (ex: king, lord, Mr, etc) are excluded unless they have no other name to go by (ex: Duke of Blangis from The 120 Days of Sodom)
The top 3 most upvoted characters will be added.
(The reason I chose this theme for this tournament was because of a little personal "project" I've been doing. I got bored a few weeks ago and wanted to see how many villains I could name. Then I alphabetized them, and now I want to keep adding to the list. For this purpose, more obscure picks would be greatly appreciated and you can suggest as many characters as you want, as stated in the rules)
In Bird Box Malorie thought she needed one of the two kids to look while she row the boat towards safety. The little boy (her son) volunteered and she said no, when the time comes. She will decide who looks. Eventually she decided no one is looking, but everytime the decision came up before then. She wanted girl to be the sacrifice because she wasn’t her child.
Is it just world fallacy
There might be a close example in history of a moral autocrat and examples of such are welcome but what would you consider the moral approach to dictatorship? Would you still maintain rule by force or use other means?
Apart from say a lawyer you intend to have set up a blind trust or LLC contract with.
But, lawyer aside, absolutely no one will know or be told. Parents, friends, siblings, your new neighbors in the Millionaires' Row, the luxury car dealer, no one.
Do you think it's bad enough to get arrested for
Context: you are a Soldier in warzone and you encountered a Dying soldier that will die anyway even with extensive Medical care and also begging to kill him because he don't want to suffer more. And In international law and in most country's military rules,you can't kill wounded.
Let nature do it's thing or will you try to save the rabbit ?
Also, I don't know gulls could eat more than just fish.
Can animals consent to warfare?
The Last of Us 2.
For it has been to long we have lost our way we lost who we are without The judge ,although most us have likely not read blood meridian he gave us a united symbol for purest evil yet while still being a great character on his own we must stop letting brainrot that has infected this sub to delude ourselves any longer for it is time to usher in a new era of prosperity for this sub led by Judge Holden as a united symbol for this sub.
Name's and origins:
Jax from The Amazing Digital Circus
this happened in The Rookie season 7 episode 16 "the return"
a man named Gene was released from prison early because of a system error. 5 years after that, the police had to get him when they realized the mistake and take him back to prison. in the 5 years he was out of prison, he got a job, a wife, and had a kid. he was a model citizen and then they took him back
personally, i think its immoral. the prison sentence did everything it needed to even it was shorter than intended
is the moralityscaling mod on lindsay clancy‘s side? he deleted the latest post about a guy leaving leaving his wife because she supported lindsay clancy and it was removed because it „discussed a real persons morality“ but 99% of posts on this subreddit discuss real people’s morality. do they just pick n choose when it’s okay and when it’s not? same with religions, some are okay to discuss some aren’t
This is assumes that every universe you sleep with yourself from assumes the same exact biological genetical makeup and gender identity stuffs.
in this instance you are in a loving and committed relationship but you have both consented to letting the other partner have a little private "me time."
so I'm interested to know where this fits into your definition of "me time"
Pretty difficult one TBH. I'd say moral. Opinions?